Trump Still Pretending The Most Dangerous Domestic Terrorists Are People Who Don’t Like Fascism
from the his-own-people-are-still-the-worst dept
Just to be clear, when I refer to “Trump” in terms of his administration, I’m referring to the collective hive mind of dangerous enablers he employs. Trump, by himself, is incapable of closing an umbrella. It’s the people around him that are dangerous, since they’re able to convert his rants and brain stem impulses into action.
While it’s understandable that an aspiring autocrat like Trump would feel threatened by a movement dedicated to opposing fascists, it’s only now that he’s returned to office that he can do anything about it. Deliberately ignoring the fact that the most dangerous domestic terrorists are located on the far right of the political spectrum (including the hundreds of people he pardoned for assaulting police officers and raiding a federal building following his 2020 election loss), Trump’s administration is once again attempting to turn protected First Amendment activity into terroristic acts worthy of lengthy minimum federal sentences.
The United States was as concerned as always about Islamist terrorism, said the official, Monica A. Jacobsen, according to a copy of her prepared remarks reviewed by The New York Times and three officials briefed on the meeting. But, she told her counterparts from Europe, Canada and Australia, the Trump administration also wanted more attention on what it believed was an insidious, underestimated threat: the far left.
Western governments must combat “antifa and far-left terrorism,” Ms. Jacobsen’s prepared remarks asserted, casting the effort as an evolution in counterterrorism following the “global war on terror.” Her prepared speech defined far-left terrorism to include threats from communists, Marxists, anarchists, anticapitalists and those with “eco-extremist” and “other self-identified antifascist ideologies.”
“As always” is a nice touch. It’s always a good idea to keep an “Islamist” scapegoat in the yard, especially when you’re busy losing a war with Iran. Not only does it generate steady work for bored FBI agents, but it also allows Trump to continue pretending the mass deportation of hardworking, tax-paying non-whites is somehow contributing to the effort to root out an alleged “1,700 Iran sleeper cells” in the United States. (No “sleeper cell” has been broken up or deported despite Trump claiming the government already knows who these “sleepers” are and where they’re located.)
As evidence of the dangerousness of “far left” terrorists, Jacobsen pointed to a single protest in Milan, Italy, in which police and protesters “clashed” — the favorite euphemism deployed by people who wish readers to believe protesters were just as violent as law enforcement officers.
Meanwhile, the administration can’t actually find any hard evidence to back up its assertions about the supposed violent threat posed by far left activists.
In November, the State Department took the first major step in the strategy by designating four leftist groups in Europe — two in Greece, one in Germany and another in Italy — as terrorist organizations. None of the groups has been known to have plotted attacks on Americans in the past decade, which is usually a criterion for such a designation.
All it can do — as it did late last year when Trump unilaterally declared “antifa” a terrorist organization — is disappear any evidence to the contrary — something it did less than 48 hours after Charlie Kirk was killed by gunman during a campus appearance.
Even if you were to decide that what’s being claimed about “far left terrorism” in Europe by this administration is somehow true, you can’t ignore the facts on the ground here in the United States:
Over the past decade, right-wing extremists have killed 112 people across 152 terrorist attacks in the United States, according to an analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a bipartisan research institution. Over the same period, left-wing extremists killed 13 people over 35 attacks, according to the analysis, while jihadist attacks left 82 dead.
Even if Trump hadn’t spent his entire term so far routinely insulting and berating our European allies, it’s still unlikely he would have been able to convince them to ignore the reality of the situation for the sole purpose of future abuses of civil liberties and rights.
Trump has been pounding this table since late last year, but now he’s finding fewer world leaders willing to indulge his fantasies or nod politely as Trump’s emissaries literally make shit up about left-wing activist groups.
The State Department wants to bring foreign law enforcement officials from at least 17 countries to The Hague in May for a workshop on how to fight far-left groups like antifa.
[…]
Formal invitations had not been sent as of last week, in part because Congress had to approve funding. U.S. officials told The Times that foreign governments had expressed less interest in the events than the State Department had hoped.
Once again, let’s pause to reflect on these claims. “Antifa” simply stands for “anti-fascist.” You barely have to move left at all to oppose fascism. All you would have to do is move to the left just far enough to align with… I don’t know… Ronald Reagan? And yet this administration is so stupid and thuggish that it actually thinks it can portray people opposed to fascism as more dangerous than US citizens who actively support it.
Everything else on Trump’s list of “domestic threats” is just a lazy rip-off of McCarthyism. “Far left” supposedly covers Communists, Marxists, “anti-capitalists” (yet another tell), and “eco-extremists.” In other words, people who disagree with this particular president and his policies. Free speech is what it is. But Trump and his enablers want people to go away for decades by turning dissent into terrorism.
Meanwhile, the true terrorist threat that is the extremely foreseeable result of the war in Iran is being back-burnered in favor of locking up people who just want to see this country remain a democratic republic. Fortunately for us, the rest of the world is no longer interested (Israel, Hungary, and Russia aside) in pretending Trump poses less of a threat than the people he wants to punish.
Filed Under: antifa, domestic terrorists, donald trump, eu, far right extremists, fascism, free speech, insurrection, january 6, trump administration, white christian nationalists


Comments on “Trump Still Pretending The Most Dangerous Domestic Terrorists Are People Who Don’t Like Fascism”
MAGA is the minority. If we were what they say we are, there would be no more MAGA.
At first, I read this as “people who disagree with this particular pervert and his policies,” and it didn’t change anything.
He’s working his way through the ‘First they came for…’ poem like a to-do list, including the unspoken (because it was written by a priest) early victims like LGBTQ+ people. Lots of future outgroups are currently still kidding themselves that they will not come for them if they sit on the fence and wag their copies of the New York Times at the people speaking out and standing up when they still can… But theit time will come.
Re:
“First they came for trans people, but they’re icky, so I’m gonna start the poem somewhere else.”
What you’re overlooking is that Trump and the hive-mind are almost entirely self-centered. The rest of us are just non-player characters, running the factories and shops they occasionally need.
From that point of view, they’re right and you’re wrong. They’re not ignoring the threat; they’re evaluating it and concluding that the people who dislike fascism pose the most danger to them, whereas the people you identify as “dangerous” are not really dangerous to anyone that matters. And if you publically disagree with that, you might just end up on Trump’s enemies list.
The far-right loves the term “far-left”. They like to think that anything to the left of Fox News is “dangerously leftist”.
To them the political center is so distant it is wildly progressive.
Trump and his regime belong in the Hague alright, just not at the table he wants to sit at.
A minor correction.
You must have missed the news. Orbán seriously lost the Hungarian elections last weekend.
Re:
But still elected a right wing government. Just one not as corrupt and in Putin’s pocket.
Hopefully.
Well, people who don’t like fascism are dangerous to him.
The Ku Klux Klan is an organization with a history of violence and terrorism—up to and including murder—that it has inflicted upon people of color and their allies, but it must still be allowed to exist. “Antifa” is, at best, an unorganized array of loosely organized groups that has no real history of explicit terroristic acts, but it (and the broad ideology for which “antifa” stands) must still be quashed out of existence.
This is the stance of the Trump regime and Republicans in general until and unless they say otherwise.
Re:
Minor but important correction:
This is the stance of the Trump regime and Republicans in general until and unless they say and prove by their actions otherwise.
They can say whatever they want as this article and others like it demonstrate, what matters and shows their true position and beliefs is what they do.
Re: Re:
A fair point. 👍
That republicans consider the entirety of humanity to be enemies can lead one to question what other species republicans must be instead.
Re:
Homo policeii?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I’m sure they’ll stop once they get the next batch of angry letters they totally have been reading, and haven’t been just dumping into the trash.
Re:
By all means if you think contacting your representatives in congress isn’t effective tell the class what you think people should be doing, and to avoid confusion be specific.
That's what "terrorist" has always meant
It should be a suprise to nobody that as the political beliefs of the US government change, the groups it labels with the specific designation of “opposed to the US government-to be killed” will also change. Being a danger to US citizens in general has never actually factored into the decision, almost every group on the list is there for their potential impact on US geopolitical ambitions.
Re:
If anything, being a danger to certain US citizens is enough to have a group’s acts of terrorism overlooked. Just look at how the government has never tried to outlaw the Ku Klux Klan despite its documented history of terroristic violence towards Black people.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
“Antifascists” are in fact very fascist, and very dangerous. There have been several sniping incidents.
Antifa are the bad guys, not sure what part you don’t get.
Re:
Tell me something: How many murders have confirmed antifascists been convicted of committing in the past 30 years, and how does that number compare to just the number of people killed by the right-wing shitheads who pulled off the Oklahoma City bombing?
Re:
Probably the part you pulled out of your ass. Which would be all the parts.
Can we stop for a moment and let me point out that “antifa means anti-fascist” does not prove anything about what they do? It makes you sound like a tool. You’ve read 1984, you know words don’t have to mean exactly what they say, you even point it out when Trump or Jim Jordan does the same thing (remember the committee on the weaponization of the federal government, or the patriot act?), but as soon as it’s Antifa you turn your fucking brain off.
Look, I accept the premise that Antifa is not a terrorist organization, but “look at their name!” convinces nobody and makes you sound like an idiot.
Re:
I was there as the term evolved. It’s literally just a label for people who think, correctly, that the U.S. government is a fascist regime and who oppose that.
It isn’t the name of an organization in the first place, let alone a terrorist one.
Re: Re:
And in cases where a group does have “antifa” or “antifascist” in its name, that group isn’t part of a organization with top-down leadership of any kind.
Re:
Tool, mirror.