Jeff Bezos Is Destroying What’s Left Of The Washington Post To Please Our Dim, Unpopular Autocrats
from the the-lords-of-agitprop dept
Jeff Bezos this week continued to dismantle what’s left of the Washington Post via another massive round of layoffs that left remaining staff stunned. Among the latest cuts is the elimination of the paper’s popular sports desk, scaling back of international and local news, the firing of an untold swath of journalists, and the ending of the paper’s book sections, among other major changes.
This comes on the heels of other decisions by Bezos to fire all of the paper’s black columnists, turn the op-ed section into pro-corporatist agitprop, censor cartoonists that criticize Jeff, and generally shift the paper’s journalistic tone in a more right wing, autocrat-friendly, corporatist direction. You know, like every other major corporate media outlet from CNN to CBS.
Of course, nobody actually wants this. The actual audience for extraction class agitprop is arguably very small and already quite well served. So it’s amusing to see WAPO leadership insist that these additional, brutal cuts are necessary because the paper has been losing subscribers and “wants to be competitive“:
“Murray acknowledged that the Post has struggled to reach “customers” and talked about the competitive media marketplace. “Today, the Washington Post is taking a number of actions across the company to secure our future,” he said, according to an audio recording of the meeting.”
Let’s be clear: billionaires like Jeff Bezos don’t want a functioning press. They want the lazy simulacrum of a functional press that caters to their ideology (more for me, less for you) and protects their interests. As with Larry Ellison’s acquisition of CBS and TikTok, and Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, it’s best to view this as a global project to defang accountability for the planet’s richest, shittiest people and corporations.
Former Washington Post editor Marty Baron didn’t really mince words about what this means for a once-functional newspaper that, at this point, probably can’t be salvaged:
WAPO management insist that they’re going to “narrow their focus on politics.” By this they mean more of the feckless, “both sides,” “view from nowhere” DC gossip reporting you see at other billionaire-owned outlets like Axios, Semafor, and Politico. Glad-handy journalism that’s less concerned with the truth than it is appeasing ownership, protecting access, and keeping the ad money flowing.
The kind of wimpy, soft-knuckled cack that can (and repeatedly is) exploited by authoritarian zealots who know these outlets lack the courage to call them out for what they really are. You see, if you’re honest about the extremist nature of our unpopular autocratic government, you might lose access, upset paper management, alienate Republican ad viewers, or piss off regulators eyeing your latest merger.
Bezos could fund functional journalism at the Washington Post for decades to come without making a dent in his finances, were that something of actual interest to him. This is a guy who just blew $75 million on a propaganda puff piece kissing the ass of the president’s wife. That kind of money could fund most independent newsrooms for the better part of the next decade.
Jeff wants to ensure the administration will pay him to launch his unreliable rockets into space, slather his fledgling LEO satellite network with subsidies, coddle his cloud computing empire, allow him to dominate every last aspect of modern retail, and generally be broadly exploitative in a way that undermines competition, consumers, and labor. He wants, and applauds, Trump’s destruction of the regulatory state.
Bezos still “wins” even if the Post doesn’t survive his “leadership.” At worst (for Jeff) the paper is converted into a sad, pseudo-journalistic simulacrum that exists largely to blow smoke up the ass of wealth and power. At best another major media institution is destroyed, eliminating yet another outlet that used to (admittedly with increasing inconsistency) hold billionaires and corporate power to account.
But it’s really something even worse than just rich people destroying journalism to coddle their delicate egos and protect their financial interests. All of this really is part of a broad, multi-generational effort by the extraction class to eliminate checks and balances and accountability, erode informed consensus, befuddle the electorate, and dismantle not just democratic norms, but democracy itself.
And, if you hadn’t noticed, it’s been a smashing success so far.
If there’s a plus side to this mess, it’s that Jeff and Elon and Larry’s clumsy efforts to dominate and destroy U.S. journalism create vast new opportunities for indie newsletter authors, worker-owned newsrooms, and independent outlets (like Techdirt), to serve a public that’s desperate for something tangible, courageous, and real in a sea of bullshit and clumsy artifice. Give them, and us, your time and money.
Filed Under: agitprop, disinformation, jeff bezos, journalism, maga, media, propaganda
Companies: washington post


Comments on “Jeff Bezos Is Destroying What’s Left Of The Washington Post To Please Our Dim, Unpopular Autocrats”
But he’s doing such a great job restoring trust in the media!
Re:
Wait, wait, I’ve got another one.
How are those personal liberties and free markets working out for you, Jeff?
Re: Re:
Another one: Hi Jeff, when are you going to become as deranged as that guy with the same first name as you but last name starts with the letter “E” and start funding white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and white supremacists?
Remember that a rightward shift with no ends is an endorsement of terrorism as violent as the perpetrators of 9/11!
And remember that the failson Mark Zuckerberg lost a top IP attorney because that attorney couldn’t handle Zuckerberg sinking into neo-Nazi madness and toxic masculinity!
Re:
All the people purporting to want restored trust in the media are either billionaires or their sycophants wanting to restore the trust that billionaires have that the media will defer to their interests above all else.
Though, to be fair, I’ve been told that all these billionaire capitalist corporations are actually radical commie leftist organizations.
Re: Re:
Nah, I want restored trust in the media. I just have the radical idea that the best way of doing it is for the media to stop being so untrustworthy all the time.
Re: Re: Re:
I’m referring to the people who use the phrase as a masthead for their decisions, and specifically people who have the power to do something about it, like Jeff bezos or Barry Weiss. Similar to the way that Elon musk proclaims to be a free speech absolutist.
‘Dim, Unpopular Autocrats’, or as Jeff calls them, his people.
“It needs to make more money” for a billionaire-owned paper is nonsense anyway.
Elon Musk has made X lose oodles of accounting money, but the kind of influence he bought with turning it into a propaganda mill blowing smoke up Trump’s ass would have been way more expensive with more conventional bribes.
It’s not like the concept is new. Just look at what “Citizen Kane” did with the imaginary “New York Inquirer” in a movie created in 1941, being inspired by the actual vita of William Randolph Hurst.
Any billionaire who claims that “their newspaper” needs to be more profitable is lying through their teeth. One does not own newspapers for profit unless we are talking about publicly traded ones.
Re:
It does, in fact, have to make money.
Twitter is in fact making money now (it wasn’t before Musk bought it)
Moreover, even if “it doesn’t need to make money” (it does) the only way that can continue is for Bezos to spend enormous amounts of his money on it, which he is free to stop at any time and obvious cannot do forever unless Amazon is making him more money than he’s spending on WaPo. So….it still needs to make money.
This is basic economics.
You’re a moron.
Re: Re:
Twitter has lost more than half of its income since Musk took over. You know people can just look it up and fact check your bullshit right?
Remember how Musk literally said he was going to sue companies that stopped advertising with him after he told them to fuck off? Definitely things you say when you’re making lots of money and staying in the black.
Neckbeards muttering “basic economics” is always a red flag. Economics are rarely basic and anything that is purported to be simple is just the result of an uneducated chud deep-throating the Dunning-Kruger effect while thinking he’s the smartest guy in the room because he half remembers a 4chan post about finance.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
You realize that THe Washington Post is losing money hand over fist, right? Bezos bought it as a charity project, and he’s the only reason it still exists. It would just simply be GONE without him.
Yeah, so:
Yeah, if he didn’t want that, he could just let it go. Stop keeping it afloat with literally hundreds of millions of dollars of his personal money each year.
She was fired for being racist and incredibly hateful.
You realize you’re kind of a commie who does not realize how anything works, right?
Re:
Except someone else could buy it and not compromise journalistic integrity for the sake of appeasing the egos of people for whom billions of dollars will never be enough to make everyone like them or think they’re cool.
But also, if a news outfit has to compromise its values to exist, it doesn’t deserve to exist.
It seems like maybe he thinks it’s valuable and its not a charity but rather a platform for his personal agenda…
Also, you missed the point that you responded to. It is not currently a functional press because he currently controls it, even while it still exists.
That isn’t even the excuse the Post gave, so you’re just making up bullshit here. She was fired because the Post was afraid of the perceived backlash against people and associated organizations who didn’t genuflect over the corpse of a murdered hateful bigot. That you would purport that to be racist and hateful is just another accusation-confession.
Somebody get grandpa his meds. You’ve been watching too much Dr. Strangelove on the old tube there, buddy. Take a nap. Get your prostate checked. Call your grandkids and apologize if they haven’t already gone no contact.
Re: Re:
Anyone else who bought it would ALSO have to feed it hundreds of millions of dollars a year or make drastic cuts retard.
It’s like YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THESE THINGS HAVE TO MAKE MONEY.
Y’know what’s making money now, despite enormous bitching and whining by Techdirt? Twitter.
So yeah, stupid commies, the lot of you.
Re: Re: Re:
Oh hey look at Dr. Strange here with his time gem able to see all possible realities…
It’s like you don’t understand the difference between funding and direct egocentric influence…
If it were owned by a variety of shareholders who valued an independent media rather than a single individual who demanded his interests taint the perspective of the paper, it wouldn’t be as tainted.
But also, again, if it could only make money by presenting false representations that served the egos of billionaires, it would deserve not to exist.
ExTwitter’s revenue is less than half of what it was when Musk purchased it, such that Musk literally sued companies and influenced sycophantic conservative attorneys general to sue companies who refused to advertise with him anymore. It’s valuation is less than what he paid for it. But please, definitely hold up that shit sandwich, take a big juicy bite, and smile for the cameras as you proudly tell us how tasty the e coli and excrement is.
“My telescreen told me that the chocolate ration is up from 30 grams to 20 grams!”
“Freedom of speech”
This is what unrestricted freedom of speech looks like, and this is why the government should restrict the speech of news corporations and other major public influencers.
Re:
And who has been in charge of the government since last year?
Democracy dies in darkness (well, yeah, it looks way dark ‘cuz Bezos ain’t got just his nose up where the sun don’t shine but his whole head is stuck up in there and he can’t really see nothin’).
Talk about wasting money..
,,how about sending is trophy bride and a bunch of her BFF’s up in space? Just because he can. I’ve seen estimates as high as $40 million. And then renting Venice for his wedding? I’ve seen estimates at between $20-25 million. Her wedding ring reportedly cost as much as $5 million. Say between those three “just for the fuck of it” outlandishly expensive, ostentatious expenditures, he blew maybe $70 million? I wonder how many Post journalists that could have kept on staff for say 5 years?
What a fucking joke.
I cancelled my subscription because of the dropped endorsement for Harris. Maybe a month later, I resubscribed because they have the best DC political coverage. I’ve nearly dropped it again, because of the loss of all my favorite opinion columnists.
Now I’m thinking I’ll have to permanently drop it. What a sad end to such a great paper.
Where now?
Where is the Trump hating leftie/progressive to go? The New York Times is too Israel adjacent for many and then there’s … Maybe split your subscription between Propublica and other niche publications like um TechDirt but that’s no good for general news junkies. I’m sorry I’ve tried to give it up.
Re:
Maybe the entire concept of corporate media has never been leftist by its very nature and larger outlets systemically can’t resist corruption from capitalist pressures. A healthy media diet has to be piecemeal and diverse because singular sources will always have unseen biases and missing elements. It’s harder to be intellectually honest, but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth the effort.
“Democracy dies in darkness.”
Cool. So let’s create some darkness! The last thing I want is democracy – the people might vote to take as much as ten cents from me! That Will Not Do.
Re:
Im surprised he didn’t change their slogan to democracy dies in dankness after trump Jr screwed up his attempt at posting a “sick burn”.