California Lawmakers Pass A Bill That Would Ban Use of Face Masks By Law Enforcement

from the you-serve-the-public,-you-mooks dept

It’s probably too much to ask, but I hope California law enforcement agencies will remember who to direct their hate at if this bill becomes law. It’s not the “liberals” running the state. It’s the Trump administration and its mass deportation efforts. ICE and its actions have always been controversial, but it took a group of bigots serving non-consecutive terms to really unleash its inherent ugliness.

What we’ve been seeing since Trump’s return to office has been ICE and anti-brown people sentiment at its worst. ICE raids Home Deport parking lots, neighborhoods, and swap meets, rather than performing targeted arrests of truly dangerous undocumented immigrants. But this insistence on masking officers and hiding outward designations of their originating agency is something specifically tied to Trump’s second administration.

ICE has sowed. California law enforcement agencies are now on the verge of reaping this particular whirlwind, as CBS News reports.

Lawmakers in California passed a bill on Thursday banning most local and federal law enforcement officers from covering their faces during operations, including immigration enforcement.

Senate Bill 627, known as the No Secret Police Act, was introduced by Democratic state Sens. Scott Wiener of San Francisco and Jesse Arreguin of Berkeley in June after immigration operations ramped up across the state as part of President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration. The bill will now head to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk for final approval. 

The bill [PDF] opens up with the legislators’ refusal to allow law enforcement to take advantage of preexisting double-standard:

Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to wear a mask, false whiskers, or any personal disguise, as specified, with the purpose of evading or escaping discovery, recognition, or identification while committing a public offense, or for concealment, flight, evasion, or escape from arrest or conviction for any public offense.

This bill would make it a crime for a law enforcement officer to wear a facial covering in the performance of their duties, except as specified. The bill would define law enforcement officer as anyone designated by California law as a peace officer who is employed by a city, county, or other local agency, and any officer or agent of a federal law enforcement agency or law enforcement agency of another state, or any person acting on behalf of a federal law enforcement agency or agency of another state. The bill would make a violation of these provisions punishable as an infraction or a misdemeanor, as specified. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

This won’t stop ICE and other federal officers from wearing masks while terrorizing the populace, of course. But it will at least prevent local law enforcement from blending in with Trump’s masked goon squads, which might discourage them from pitching in with questionable “round up all the brown people” raids performed by ICE and its federal partners.

Added to the bill are a lot of official legislative declarations — ones that point out the numerous problems created by officers who choose to disguise themselves when performing their public duties.


(a)[T]he routine use of facial coverings by law enforcement officers has significant implications for public perception, officer-community interactions, and accountability.

(b) Whether intentional intended or not, members of the public may experience fear or intimidation when approached by officers whose faces are obscured. This perception can heighten defensive behaviors and unnecessarily escalate situations.

(c) Facial coverings limit the visibility of facial expressions, which are essential components of nonverbal communication. In high-stress or emotionally charged interactions, the inability to read an officer’s expression may lead to misinterpretation of tone or intent, increasing the risk of conflict escalation.

(d) The visibility of an officer’s face is vital for promoting transparency, facilitating communication, and building trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve.

(e) When officers are not readily identifiable, it increases the risk of impersonation by unauthorized individuals, which further undermines public trust, endangers public safety, and hinders legitimate law enforcement operations.

This exposes the lie that is used most frequently by law enforcement: that masking up makes officers “safer.” It doesn’t. It creates a ton of negative side effects, many of which endanger people on both sides of the law enforcement equation. What it definitely does not do is make officers “safer.”

On top of that, there’s the damage done to the public’s relationship with law enforcement, which has never been great. Destroying trust only takes a few self-serving actions by cops who’d rather have their power completely decoupled from any responsibility. Rebuilding this trust takes maximum effort and years of work — something almost no law enforcement agency (federal or local) is willing to do. So, the baseline is trust that has likely been irreparably damaged. And now, law enforcement seems to think the best way to do cop business is by destroying what little trust remains by dressing up like cartel death squads while enforcing civil laws pertaining to citizenship.

Cops will no doubt complain about this new mandate if it’s codified. Fuck them. They had all the time in the world to repair their relationship with the public. And if they’ve chosen to be more like ICE in its current iteration, they absolutely need to have this dubious privilege taken out of their hands.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “California Lawmakers Pass A Bill That Would Ban Use of Face Masks By Law Enforcement”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
16 Comments
btr1701 (profile) says:

Re:

Hawaii tried something similar about five years ago when its legislature passed a state law prohibiting law enforcement from carrying firearms while off-duty. The law specifically included federal agents– FBI, Secret Service, DEA, etc.) in its prohibition. It took all of 10 seconds for a federal court to invalidate the law with regard to federal personnel and tell Hawaii to stay in its lane; the court said if the state wants to prohibit their own cops from being able to defend themselves or others while off-duty, they can do it, but they have no authority over federal agents.

And, of course, there’s the real reason everyone from blue politicians to open borders activists want them to stop wearing masks: so they can take pictures of them, run them through a Google AI reverse image search, and identify them, so that masked (behold the irony, right?) ‘resistance’ types can show up at their homes and terrorize them and their children.

Take a look at what’s been going on outside the ICE building in Portland for the last 40 days or so and honestly tell me you’d be surprised if one of those goons in their death’s head masks drove by an ICE agent’s house some night and lobbed a Molotov cocktail through the window.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re:

And, of course, there’s the real reason everyone from blue politicians to open borders activists want them to stop wearing masks: so they can take pictures of them, run them through a Google AI reverse image search, and identify them, so that masked (behold the irony, right?) ‘resistance’ types can show up at their homes and terrorize them and their children.

You seem confused. It’s the masked officers who are terrorizing people, including children. Unmasking cops who violate human and civil rights means they can be sued and even charged with the criminal acts that they violate. It will make the Nuremberg Trials 2.0 a lot easier to run. A part of the right of redress enshrined in the 1st Amendment and the confrontation clause in the 6th Amendment is that you have a right to know who is attacking you, who is arresting you, who is accusing you. I’m sure you think you’re a big supporter of the Constitution who just randomly forgot that those were enumerated rights.

Take a look at what’s been going on outside the ICE building in Portland for the last 40 days or so and honestly tell me you’d be surprised if one of those goons in their death’s head masks drove by an ICE agent’s house some night and lobbed a Molotov cocktail through the window.

Portland has its share of black bloc anarchists, but the people who have been protesting around the ICE building in Portland are non-violent protesters who specifically want to waste ICE’s time in order to explode it’s operating budget. If you think it’s all black bloc anarchists, then you’re watching biased news sources instead of checking out the livestreams from the protesters themselves. It’s full of people just sitting around and random people showing up to give the protesters food and water. Your sources are only going to show the five minutes of some anarchists being rowdy. And they definitely won’t show the officers assaulting the non-violent protesters without provocation.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

btr1701 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

“…the people who have been protesting
around the ICE building in Portland are
non-violent protesters”

The hell they are. They’re not just attacking federal personnel and vehicles with fireworks and other objects whenever they leave the building– which is violence– they’re now attacking the residents of the neighborhood whenever they complain about being kept awake for 80 days straight and having their property vandalized. There’s video footage of one of the protest leaders punching an elderly woman in the face, then clubbing her on the head with a megaphone. And when other neighbors call the cops and report all these crimes, the cops tell them they won’t come because enforcing any laws againist the protesters can be seen as aiding ICE and a violation of Portland’s sanctuary city laws. There are 911 recordings of residents reporting assaults and batteries in real time of other neighborhood residents– “I’m watching them surround and kick him right now” and being told they’re basically on their own. (I bet that makes them feel good about paying all those taxes, amirite?)

And the ‘protesters’ have also set up ad hoc security in the area around the ICE building, literally stopping people on the street to demand their IDs– under threat of violence and exclusion from their homes– so they can make sure they’re real residents and not an undercover cop or a reporter. Before they went full-Stasi and started their ID checks, they’ve been caught on camera violently driving off any independent media creators– YouTubers, TikTokers, etc.– that they believed weren’t down with the cause. Zero self-awareness with these people: in their self-righteous fight against fascism, they’re going full fascist.

Non-violent, my ass.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

btr1701 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

Oh, look! The TechDirt bros have quasi-censored me again merely for disagreeing with them. Who here thinks they wouldn’t fully censor me if Masnick gave them the ability to do so?

So I guess all the videos and 911 calls I mentioned above are really just ILM-level special effects.

Yeah, that’s probably the most likely explanation.

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4

Hey! Site owner here. No one “censored” you. Enough people designated your very stupid post as very stupid and thus it got labeled as such. It’s quintessential more speech.

The comment is still there. People can still see it. But you have no right to demand that we make it easily accessible.

Don’t want that to happen, stop saying stupid obviously incorrect shit.

btr1701 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5

Hey! Rational person who can actually read here.

Contrary to your claim, I made no demand of you or anyone else. I criticized the actions of your sycophants but I made no demands. It was what one might call quintessential more speech.

Back when your “hidden by the community” deal started it was to declutter the spam posts. Not to hide from view any dissent or disagreement from the site’s group-think.

Look at my second post below. There’s nothing ‘very stupid’ about it. It’s a valid analysis of California’s utter lack of legal jurisdiction over the attire of federal law enforcement. Yet it got hidden because it doesn’t follow the accepted views of the hive mind here at TechDirt.

Same with the post above. Not only wasn’t it “very stupid”, it was backed up with a precedential ruling from a federal court against Hawaii when it tried regulating federal law enforcement in a similar manner. But it got hidden because it didn’t support the “ICE bad” party line.

One doesn’t have to say “stupid obviously incorrect shit” to get the quasi-censor treatment here. Only only has to disagree with the politics of the majority of your remoras.

I’m sure this one will be hidden, too. Just watch.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Yes, I saw the Fox News coverage that you’re blindly repeating as if it’s trustworthy. I’ve also seen the Portland residents reporting that Fox News is taking footage that residents are posting online and making up fake narratives for their own footage. You’re also failing to point out that some of the people the protesters have clashed with are counter-protesters who go down there to start a fight. But Fox doesn’t tell you that because it wants you to be confident that only the people you don’t like are bad guys and everyone you perceive to be on your side is completely blameless. ICE has been using tear gas on local residents who aren’t even protesting. ICE has been attacking non-violent protesters. ICE has been racially profiling US citizens. But sure, Fox gave you some great excuses for ignoring that.

Videographer struck with projectiles by federal officers at Oregon ICE protest

Federal cops ‘instigating’ confrontations with protesters outside ICE building, Portland police official says in court

How ICE protests have unfolded in Portland, from June until now

Ninja (profile) says:

Trump doesn’t care with the most important law in the US, the Constitution, why would he care about states laws? And he can always take it to the corrupt SCOTUS to shot it down based on secret reasoning.

Now, the states themselves can and should stand up to this bullshit. It’s a union. And nobody is forced to be part of it if the head is a corrupt gangster.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

btr1701 (profile) says:

State officials have no jurisdiction or legal authority to dictate the equipment a federal law enforcement agency can or cannot use while performing their duties.

This is performative legislation in furtherance of Gavin’s quest for the presidency. If they even try to enforce it, it’ll fail on summary judgement in federal court.

California cannot impose a dress code on federal law enforcement.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...