Black Man Shot By Cops Dies After White Cop Suffering An ‘Anxiety Attack’ Snags Ambulance
from the no-service,-no-protection dept
Black Lives Matter. All Cops Are Bastards.
These are not temporary catchphrases. These are universal and forever.
And leave it to a cop to ensure we never forget either of these concepts. A foot pursuit that ended in the shooting of Connecticut resident Dyshan Best would otherwise just be a footnote in cop history if some cops hadn’t decided to be the bastards they wanted to see in the world and make it extremely clear they felt a Black life didn’t matter.
The internal investigation of the shooting of a Black man by Bridgeport PD officers delivered unsurprising results:
Dyshan Best, 39, was shot in the back last year as he fled from officers in Bridgeport, Connecticut. A report released Tuesday by the state’s inspector general found that the shooting was justified because Best had a gun in his hand and the officer pursuing him had reasons to fear for his own safety.
All the stuff we expect to see in these reports is here, beginning with the assumption that a gun is a threat even if it’s not pointed at officers to the de rigueur “fear for my safety” justification for shooting a fleeing person.
What’s somewhat expected — but still somehow surprising — is what happened after the apparently justified shooting:
The first ambulance called to take Best to the hospital arrived at the scene at 6:02 p.m., about 14 minutes after the shooting. However, at the urging of other officers, that ambulance was used to take away a white police officer, Erin Perrotta, who had been involved in the foot chase, the report said.
Paramedics reported that Perrotta declined treatment in the ambulance.
“I am fine, I just needed to get out of here,” she said, according to the report. Another officer described Perrotta at the time as “visibly hysterical (crying and breathing rapidly) and had blood all over her uniform,” the report said.
That’s right. The ambulance sent to pick up the person police officers had just shot was instead handed over to Officer Erin Perrotta, who — as the Inspector General’s report notes — was enduring the relative hardship of a “mild anxiety attack.”
The second ambulance didn’t show up for another ten minutes. The person with actual bullet holes in him didn’t hit the ER until 14 minutes after Officer “Anxiety Attack” Perrotta arrived at the hospital. The officer who was never in any danger of dying got nearly a 15-minute head start on her medical treatment.
The person they’d shot didn’t make it.
Best died at 7:41 p.m. as he was undergoing treatment for the gunshot wound, which damaged his liver and right kidney.
Meanwhile, Officer Perrotta’s employer only seems interested in outlasting this news cycle:
A spokesperson for Bridgeport police, Shawnna White, declined to comment Wednesday when asked about Perrotta taking the first ambulance. She said in an email that the police department’s Internal Affairs Division would conduct its own investigation.
Sometimes the lack of direct response says more than a direct response would. Perrotta is apparently currently on administrative leave “due to an unrelated matter.” That either means Perrotta does bad stuff often enough she’s already given the department another reason to sideline her or that the department has found other stuff to add to this headline-generating “#mefirst” effort by the officer to grease the wheels for the inevitable firing.
Whatever happens now won’t budge the needle for US law enforcement agencies. But for the rest of us not standing on the inside of the Thin Blue Line, this incident says the quiet part loud: Black lives don’t matter… not when it’s a cop claiming they can’t breathe.
Filed Under: black lives matter, bridgeport police, connecticut, dyshan best, police oversight, police shooting


Comments on “Black Man Shot By Cops Dies After White Cop Suffering An ‘Anxiety Attack’ Snags Ambulance”
Whose fault?
Isn’t this the ambulance crew’s fault? Wouldn’t they be the ones to perform medical triage?
Re:
They already shot one guy. You gonna be the one to tell them “no?” Paramedics aren’t trained or equipped to stand up to uniformed terrorists.
Re:
If the ambulance crew had sidelined the cop and treated the gunshot wound first, this would still be a scandal. Only difference is that a human life might have been saved after those cops had needlessly endangered it.
Re: Who’s fault
I’ve seen that the ambulance crew are in trouble for taking the police officer, but would you be able to say no to a group of armed people who have already shot somebody in the back, and are insisting that you look after their own first?
Re: yeah
Named in the tort suit also.
Re:
No. They can’t do fuck-all until cops give them the go-ahead. Sometimes the can’t even enter the wider neighborhood unless the cops feel like declaring the area to be “secured”.
My place in the pool
Is $1.2 million. Even I could litigate this suit.
Body cams are so good for showing the bad behaviour.
I would think
That Police are given basic triage, and life safety. AS they are doing 90% of the shooting.
I would also think a few Shots from Rubber Bullets would slow most Anyone down.
But we cant have SAFE police shootings, even if they had Rubber bullets at close range, WHICH can pernitrate the body.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
If you have a gun in your hand and are in any sort of conflict with a cop then yes, you are a threat and are highly likely to get shot.
Don’t try to run them over, either.
The races are also unimportant, and you are racist for thinking it is.
Re:
As history proves over and over agin, you’re full of shit.
Re: Murderer cops don't make your city safer
Lick their boots haaarder, Mr Useful Idiot
Believe all they say
Believe and sing their praises while you liiick
You are one who throws away liberty for safety and so deserves neither
Re:
The cops will and have shot people who didn’t even have guns you boot sucking shitwit.
Re:
That’s an excuse a cop tells you to justify shooting a person in the back. It’s also the same that a cop will tell you if you’re wielding an airsoft gun or a phone or any random object or just have your hands in your pockets. Police propaganda isn’t reality. It’s post hoc justification for abuses.
Sure, what about trying to turn the wheel away from them and get away from a cop trying to make up an excuse to murder you?
Except the races are important if the cops disproportionately target, assault, and kill people of color and their communities. The bias and racism of the cops can be very fucking important. This is quite the accusation-confession that you’ve declared other people racist for thinking that cops are statistically racist in their biases.
Re:
If you have a gun in your hand and are in any sort of conflict with a cop then yes, you are a threat and are highly likely to get shot.
I have guns to protect myself from cops, courtesy of my 2nd amendment right. Glad to know that if such a situation occurs, my best course of action is to shoot first, since I’m a threat regardless.
Is your son still hiding under his desk at work Dave?
Re:
Don’t try to run them over, either.
I think Jonathan Ross isn’t going to be running in front of any cars anytime soon. He’s huddling in hiding with his mail-order wife, explaining to their kids why they can’t bring their daddy to school for ‘career day.’
Re:
Does “running away” count as being “in any sort of conflict”? Most people would probably say “no”.
Though I will agree that many cops will say that a person running away from them with a gun in their hand is a threat, and such a person is highly likely to get shot by cops. And having the gun in his hand makes the shooting at least slightly more justifiable and/or understandable than a number of other shootings where the victim doesn’t even have or own a gun, doesn’t have any explosives or sharp objects, and is running away, wheelchair-bound and facing away from the cops, or restrained, but that really isn’t saying much since that is not justified really at all.
Re:
I’m not sure I entirely agree in this case. Honestly, this seems more like they know better than to comment on this until the internal investigation is complete (possibly because of their lawyer’s advice), and that probably is the best thing they could say.
Now I expect her to sue her employer for not providing a safe work environment.
'No-one is more dangerous than someone trying to get away!'
Dyshan Best, 39, was shot in the back last year as he fled from officers in Bridgeport, Connecticut. A report released Tuesday by the state’s inspector general found that the shooting was justified because Best had a gun in his hand and the officer pursuing him had reasons to fear for his own safety.
‘They were running away from me, of course I feared for my life and opened fire!’
These days ‘I feared for my life’ when used by cops might as well be translated directly to ‘I wanted an excuse to murder someone and get away with it.’
Re:
The ostensible rationale cops state for shooting people running away with weapons is that they could use those weapons against innocent bystanders somewhere else, but that is contradicted by the pattern of cops not caring if they accidentally shoot and/or kill innocent bystanders themselves and the various local and state governments arguing in court that cops shouldn’t held liable for said killing of innocent bystanders.
The logic also doesn’t work because an unarmed escapee could easily find a weapon if they were intent on killing random people, so cops would arguably by that standard be justified in just killing anyone on the chance they might harm someone in the future. And my immediate next thought is, “don’t give them ideas,” but I’m also confident they’ve already thought of this.
I don’t know what to make of this trend of cops killing people with names like “Good” and “Best”