Sen. Blackburn Gets Shitty Because Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Attended An Awards Show Where ICE Was Criticized
from the clown-ass-GOP dept
I don’t understand sycophancy. Never have. I don’t know what it gets you in the long run other than a reputation for subservience. That’s worth nearly nothing in the open market. The only people who will hire you are people most people would never want to work for.
And yet, that is pretty much the entirety of the GOP under Trump: a massive collection of doormats the current president won’t even remember stepping on moments later. Sucking up to a goldfish brain like Trump makes you a fool, rather than the savvy pol you imagine yourself to be.
Welcome to the dom side of the sub/dom equation, Senator Marsha Blackburn. While she’s most famous here for trying to turn the internet into whatever the current iteration of the GOP wishes it to be (at least here at Techdirt), she’s stepped out of her comfort zone recently to publicly complain about a Supreme Court justice who attended an awards show where multiple people publicly criticized Trump’s anti-migrant actions.
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) called for an investigation Thursday into Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson for attending the Grammy Awards, where various artists criticized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
[…]
“Americans deserve a Supreme Court that is impartial and above political influence,” Blackburn wrote on social platform X. “When a Justice participates in such a highly politicized event, it raises ethical questions. We need an investigation into Justice Jackson’s ability to remain impartial.”
First things fucking last, Justice Jackson was not a presenter, nor was she a “participant” in any of the ICE criticism delivered by Grammy-nominated artists like Bad Bunny, Billie Eilish, and Justin Vernon. She was also not involved in any way with the production of the Grammy Awards ceremony, further removing her from anything that might be deemed “impartial.”
But beyond any of that is the fact that Justice Jackson had a perfectly legitimate, non-political reason to be there:
Jackson was nominated in the Best Audio Book, Narration and Storytelling Recording category for her memoir “Lovely One.”
Jackson didn’t win (she lost to the Dalai Lama which, if you’re going to lose, is probably a loss you’ll never complain about publicly) but she was nominated. That alone gave her a reason to be there. The anti-ICE content may have been personally enjoyable, but she wasn’t there to soak up the stuff being said by others.
Not that it matters to the performative doormats currently employed as GOP politicians. Sen. Blackburn immediately started banging away on her keyboard and decided to take her disgruntled Grammy Awards forum comments to the next level by sending them off to Chief Justice John Roberts:
I write today regarding recent reporting about Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s attendance at the Grammy Awards in Los Angeles, California, on Sunday, February 1, and the ethical questions raised by her attendance at such a highly politicized event. For the following
reasons, I urge you to conduct a thorough investigation into Justice Jackson’s attendance at this event and whether her presence at such an event complies with the obligation that a Supreme Court justice “act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”While it is by no means unheard of or unusual for a Supreme Court justice to attend a public function, very rarely—if ever—have justices of our nation’s highest Court been present at an event at which attendees have amplified such far-left rhetoric. Many of the attendees wore lapel pins that read “ICE OUT,” an anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) adage. One Grammy winner that evening opened his acceptance speech by stating, “Before I say thanks to God, I’m going to say ‘ICE out,’” which was received with thunderous applause by the crowd. Another award recipient that evening noted in her acceptance speech that “No one is illegal on stolen land,” going on to say that “we need to keep fighting and speaking up and protesting . . . And f*** ICE, that’s all I’m gonna say.” These statements were just two of many polarized, highly charged anti-law enforcement sentiments from that evening. It is important to note that Justice Jackson was present in the audience throughout the event.
Wow. Harsh words from someone who couldn’t be bothered to speak up while Justice Clarence Thomas received millions of dollars’ worth of gifts from right-wing benefactors over the past two decades. She was oddly quiet when it was revealed Justice Thomas’s wife was pushing election conspiracy theories. Truly an unexpected amount of yelling from someone who had nothing to say when Justice Alito’s wife was flying pro-Trump flags at Alito’s home.
Oh. Wait. Blackburn has something to say about both of those things in this letter to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court:
Unlike these meritless claims against Justice Alito and Justice Thomas, there are serious questions regarding Justice Jackson’s participation in such a brazenly political, anti-law enforcement event and her ability to remain an impartial member of the Supreme Court.
It was a Grammy Awards ceremony, not an anti-ICE protest. That people had negative things to say about ICE is completely expected, given how many people are opposed to how this administration is handling immigration enforcement. Blackburn absolutely knows she’s comparing apples to precision-machined aftermarket car parts. But like everyone else in this despicable political party, she doesn’t care and she knows it’s going to cause at least a small percentage of the converted to pretend to be offended on her behalf.
I assume John Roberts knows this as well. Let’s hope he’ll just roll his eyes and go back to binge-watching the kind of television I assume he enjoys: the no-one-asked-for-this 2023 reboot of Night Court.
Filed Under: grammys, ice, ketanji brown jackson, marsha blackburn, mass deportation, scotus, trump administration


Comments on “Sen. Blackburn Gets Shitty Because Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Attended An Awards Show Where ICE Was Criticized”
I guess its time to set the “days since Tennessee has been a national embarassment” sign back to zero.
And thank goodness! We were about to need a second digit.
Marsha Blackburn has always been an intellectually dishonest, stupid skank.
Its always Marsha Marsha Marsha…
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
KBJ (who is a disgrace, generally) really should not have cheered abolishing ICE.
You have a sitting Justice indicating she does not think the law should be executed as lawfully written.
That is an actual problem.
Re:
Note that as misleading and full of bullshit Blackburn’s take was, even she didn’t make this accusation that Justice Brown Jackson was cheering abolishing ICE.
Your Fox News comment section behavior where you just froth at the mouth in your performative 2 minutes hate schtick doesn’t work here.
You’re a dancing idiot and the people who like to see that sycophancy aren’t looking at the comments, so you’re just dancing for your own bootlicking reassurance.
And none of that even touches on the hypocrisy of conservative justices literally failing disclose their gift reception from wealthy benefactors. If we’re investigating bias and corruption, let’s go for it. This was a public event. Nothing hidden.
Re:
Funny how you have a problem with “she does not think the law should be executed as lawfully written” which in your typical fashion is something your diseased brain invented but you have no problem with the current administration wiping their ass with the constitution and breaking laws and established precedent every day which is something you vigorously defend at every opportunity and then some.
I’d call you a stupid clown but that would be an insult to stupid clowns.
Re:
You seem to have mistaken this for a place you can just spew bullshit and people will uncritically accept it as fact. It is not, in fact, one of those places.
Sticks and stones will never hurt me, but words will break my bones
Just so we’re clear, it’s more dangerous for a Supreme Court justice to listen to people saying that they think law enforcement should obey the Constitution than it is for the wife of a Supreme Court justice to encourage people to assault law enforcement. Got it.
P-State
Just designate a state where they’d likely Fit Right In – let me propose my own, South Carolina – and physically detain politicians there for violating Rational Standards of Performative Public Behavior. Of course no warrant no habeas none of your so called “fair trials.”
Most important, she was not siting in a court judging a case.
She was just taking some rest from her job to get some hindsight on things, on life.
Some people need that to make better decision. Why won’t you try it Blackburn, once in a while?
Marsha who?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Any one else find it strange that these “stars” don’t believe in borders but live in houses with huge borders around them and armed security?
Also, if you don’t believe in borders, what land was stolen?
Re:
So it turns out there are stupid questions. They seem to come from a performative bad-faith rhetoric, but stupid they are.
Re:
No, because I’m not a simplistic dumbass who thinks he’s being clever when actually just revealing he’s a dumbass.
Re: Re:
neither can contend with the argument so you resort to insults
Re: Re: Re:
No, I resort to insults because your “gotcha” isn’t a gotcha. It’s a dumbass (hopefully intentional) misunderstanding. It doesn’t warrant a contention because it’s not serious. Do you actually think that this is a valid point? Do you actually think that national borders and personal property like a house are the same thing? Do you think the existence of private property precludes believing in open borders? Do you honestly think borders are a necessary component of the issue of stolen land to a society that didn’t have official borders?
You’re not even the first to utter these dumbass comments, so on top of proving you don’t understand them and not being clever at all, you’re not even original.
Re: Re: Re:
And I have contended with your comments in the past and you never provide proof of your claims or refutation of mine, so on top of everything else, you’re a hypocrite, which…is to be entirely expected.
Re:
I find it very strange that you think every person attending the awards had exactly the same opinion even though only one person mentioned “stolen land”. I also find it very strange that you then interpret that as in “you don’t believe in borders”.
Do you even know how to write an argument or opinion that isn’t based on misconceptions, conflations, made up attributions, non-facts and a simpleton’s broken logic?
So, extreme far right stuff is fine, but anything center-right, center, or mildly left is “leftist”, and somehow that is illegal or something.
Anti-law enforcement? Seems like those supposedly charged with effectuating enforcement of law are those who seem very insistent on breaking it. So where is the enforcement on them?
i wonder who else was at the Grammys, but who is somehow immune from performative nonsense?