ICE Claims Officer Was ‘Assualted’ During An Illegal Search Of A Hospital But The Recording Shows Something Else
from the bunch-of-soulless-liars dept
For weeks, ICE and DHS have been claiming there’s been an outsized outbreak in violence against ICE officers. The government preferred to use a misleading stat: the percentage. That way it could claim assaults were up 500, 600, 790%(!!!) in successive press releases and Fox News appearances, leading many to believe being an ICE officer was perhaps the most dangerous job in America.
Unbelievably, it was Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin that finally revealed the actual numbers behind the panicky percentage claims. A 690% increase in assaults meant nothing more than this: ICE officers had been “assaulted” 69 more times since the beginning of this year as compared to the same six-month period last year.
Now, there’s even more bullshit to unpack. “Assault” means something else to law enforcement officers who want to claim they’ve been assaulted than it means to them when they’re filling out paperwork for assaults reported by citizens. According to ICE and other law enforcement officers, “assault” means anything from getting handed a beating to simply being inadvertently bumped when “interacting” with regular people while performing their public duties.
That’s exactly what happened in Ontario, California, when a masked officer claiming to be an ICE officer attempted to enter a private area of a private building — namely, the inner rooms of a surgery center. Employees of the surgery center demanded identification and a warrant — something well within their rights. In response, they got refusals and one employee got an ICE forearm to their throat.
Supposedly, there’s an assault in here but all I see is someone instinctively reacting to an assault by an ICE officer — one in which the employee did nothing more than place a hand on the officer’s arm in hopes of dissuading the officer from further assaulting their coworker:
While the officer was probably salty that the staff managed to separate him from the person he had illegally entered private property to pursue, having someone stand between you and your illegal acts is not engaging in assault. Instead, it’s you — the federal officer — who is both ignoring the constitutional limits on your power as well as refusing to respect the protections extended to the people you actually serve: the general public.
Once this recording began circulating on social media, the Trump administration reacted like it always does: by piling lies on top of lies before scattering some criminal charges on top of its mountain of bullshit. David Bier’s thread on Bluesky unpacks all of it extremely well, but let’s hit some of the high points.
First, there’s the government’s bullshit, which was, of course, delivered by DHS head Kristi Noem’s second-in-command, Tricia McLaughlin:
In a statement to KTLA about Tuesday’s incident at the surgery center, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said:
“ICE officers conducted a targeted enforcement operation to arrest two illegal aliens. Officers in clearly marked ICE bulletproof vests approached the illegal alien targets as they exited a vehicle. One of the illegal aliens, Denis Guillen-Solis who is from Honduras, fled on foot to evade law enforcement. He ended up near the Ontario Advanced Surgical Center where hospital staff assaulted law enforcement and drug the officer and illegal alien into the facility. Then, the staff attempted to obstruct the arrest by locking the door, blocking law enforcement vehicles from moving, and even called the cops claiming there was a ‘kidnapping.’”
First off, it’s not “obstruction” to prevent someone from engaging in an illegal act, even if that person claims to be a federal officer. Even federal officers are not allowed to engage in warrantless searches of private areas not open to the general public.
As for “clearly marked ICE bulletproof vests,” don’t make me choke on my own bitter laughter. Anyone with a couple hundred dollars of equipment can crank out an embroidered patch at home that contains the same letter and then attach it to anything they’ve picked up from the local military surplus outlet. ID cards, badges, and warrants might be just as easy to fake, but that still doesn’t explain why this alleged officer refused to provide any of those things when asked to, as though all that was needed was an embroidered patch and the willingness to violate the Constitution.
There’s even more bullshit in this response, but those are the things that can be immediately gleaned from the officer’s actions, the surgical center employees’ response, and the DHS’s belated attempt to paper over a clearly illegal act one of its employees attempted to carry out.
The government is now pressing assault charges against two of the surgical center employees. That affidavit [PDF] directly contradicts the claims made by the soulless cretin currently employed as the assistant secretary of the DHS.
McLaughlin claimed this was a “targeted enforcement operation” seeking a known criminal. The charging documents say otherwise, as KTLA points out in its follow-up reporting:
According to an affidavit filed in the case, the confrontation began after two immigration officers conducting roving immigration enforcement operations in Ontario followed a truck carrying three adult men. The vehicle pulled into the parking lot of a local surgery center, and two of the men fled on foot when approached by agents.
There it is: ICE was just driving around looking for people who looked foreign and then sprung into action when the officers came across a few Hispanic-looking men. There’s nothing illegal about fleeing a non-consensual stop, but the ICE officer who followed the man into the surgical center apparently thought otherwise.
And that’s where the affidavit begins to fall apart. The government claims “exigent circumstances” (namely “hot pursuit”) completely nullified the Fourth Amendment. But the government is wrong. It doesn’t do that automatically in all cases and it especially doesn’t do it when the only suspected crime isn’t a violent offense. Fleeing from an officer isn’t always probable cause for further pursuit and/or arrest. Neither does looking sorta Mexican while doing it, as a federal court in California forcefully pointed out recently.
Even if you ignore those two factors, you’re left with the suspected “crime” of being in the country illegally, which is actually a civil law violation. And civil law violations don’t justify the abuse of warrant exceptions like “hot pursuit.”
The government probably won’t drop these charges because it’s too invested in pushing the narrative that ICE is beset on all sides by assailants. But it would be the smart thing to do because it’s going to have to explain why these officers chose to ignore the Constitution en route to being “assaulted” by people unwilling to be pushed around by thugs pretending to be interested in anything resembling actual law and order. And for the rest of us, we have another data point indicating that the exponential increase in “assaults” on ICE officers is likely just a whole lot of stuff like this where people are reacting normally to masked officers who choose to behave like rogue agents.
Filed Under: assault, bullshit, california, dhs, ice, mass deportation, ontario, trump administration


Comments on “ICE Claims Officer Was ‘Assualted’ During An Illegal Search Of A Hospital But The Recording Shows Something Else”
According to cop arguments, the staff would have been within their rights to gun down the violent masked assailant, or at least beat him half to death.
Re: Bang!
Deserved.
This shit won’t stop until ICE agents weigh the cost of violating the Constitution versus the risk to their own safety and realize they are outnumbered and in the wrong.
They’re going to charge you anyway, so make the assault worthwhile and memorable.
Re:
I wouldn’t do that. That would just hand the Orange Felon an excuse to declare martial law and start rounding up everybody he doesn’t like.
Re: Re:
Is that a bad thing?
Re: Re: Re:
Yes that’s a fucking bad thing and it’s an act of abject stupidity to even need to ask that question.
Re: Re: Re:2
“Just be quiet and get on the cattle cars, or this might end up inconveniencing me.”
Re: Re:
Not that I’m advocating for anyone to risk their lives or safety, but to be honest, Trump and the fascists that preceded him will always make up any excuse they need. If one is provided, they’ll take it, but in absence of such a gift, they’ll just claim something as an excuse without evidence and proceed regardless of it being proven without a doubt that the excuse is wholly invented.
Re: Re:
So surrender your rights because if you dare to exercise them someone might violate more of them?
What exactly are “rights” that you don’t dare exercise?
Re: Re: Re:
George Carlins “Its Bad For You” should be played constantly.
“rights aren’t rights if someone can take em away. They’re privilege’s. That’s all we’ve ever had in this country is a bill of TEMPORARY privilege’s; and if you read the news, even badly, you know the list get’s shorter, and shorter, and shorter.
Re: Re: Re:2
Hey, so, both instances of “privileges” and the one instance of “gets” shouldn’t have apostrophes in there. Just being a punctuation pedant here, is all.
Re: Re: Re:3
Plus the missing apostrophe in the Carlin quote – “it” -> “it’s”
Re: Re:
You could wear a red hat to notify any migrant looking for help so they know you won’t lift a finger because that would be all the excuse fascists would need to round up even more people.
Re: Re:
Martial law wouldn’t even work here. Our military may be powerful, but we don’t have the numerical superiority to put the entire country under it. (And even then, certain things need to remain true, like courts always needing to be open as normal, from what I remember.) The military would therefore be able to only put a portion of the country under martial law, and that’s assuming that the supreme court wouldn’t rule it unconstitutional. (Please, humor me here, I’m sadly still willing to assume, perhaps, naively, that the court will eventually go “Okay, man, this is wayyyyy too far”.) But even if the military did manage to put a segment of the country under martial law, that would just incentivize citizens to rebel even harder. And I would like to think, again perhaps naively, that if Trump was insane enough to order something like a nuclear strike on California, nobody would ever carry it out because that would pretty much destroy the country.
Re: Re: Re:
Nobody in history has ever had the numbers to declare martial law. Nobody has ever had the numbers to declare normal law either. Every authority exists on the basis that most people, most of the time, don’t feel like personally dying today in a bid to stop you. And of those that do, even fewer feel like living in the mountains as guerilla fighters for the next 20 years in a bid to stop you.
Considering the level of trust in the legal system, I’d suspect almost nobody would care if martial law was declared. Frankly, many might consider it an improvement; the military is at the very least more generally respected by the US population than the police are.
Re: Re: Re:2
Oh? Yoon Suk Yeol and Kim Yong-hyun didn’t let that fact stop them.
Re: Re:
He’s going to do that anyway.
Re: Re:
He’s done that already and he didn’t need any excuse to do it, just the power.
Re: It's well past the point for judges to play nice towards the regime
Nah, it won’t stop until judges grow a spine and start throwing ICE goons in cells for assault and/or kidnapping, along with perjury and/or contempt of court charges for the regime lawyers and government agents currently making an utter mockery of the legal system.
Re:
It’s the very reason the only places ICE will go are where they can assault people like hospital staff, instead of in the gang-infested neighborhoods where they’d be more likely to find all of those gang members they keep telling us they’re protecting us from.
It’s only a matter of time before they’ll have to work on a level playing field. By that time, people might be more comfortable backing the gangs…
They (the hospital staff) “drug the officer and the illegal alien”?
Come on Tricia, are you even thinking before talking?
Less about “fleeing” some assholes, and more about rushing to get medical assistance.
The Ministry of Truth would be proud
Self-defense from assault is considered assault itself when the one you’re defending yourself or another from might have a badge.
Slavery is freedom.
War is peace.
Defending yourself is violence.
Re:
CTFY. YW.
In sane world? sure. In the this one right now? It seems more like all they have to do is moon the lower courts and keep appealing. Then SCOTUS will be happy to grant the executive branch the power to a) moon the lower courts without consequence, and b) charge assault victims for the crime of being assaulted by ICE.
impersonating an "officer"
Just wondering what would happen if more people started wearing masks and perhaps questioning whether other people dressed similarly were really Ice agents. Is wearing a mask “impersonating an officer?”
Re:
Knowing how self-centered judges are, it would continue to be ignored up until the point a judge or politician is affected by it.
“Instead, it’s you — the federal officer — who is both ignoring the constitutional limits on your power as well as refusing to respect the protections extended to the people you actually serve: the general public.”
Regime soldiers aren’t there to serve the public, they’re there to enforce the will of the regime.
Re:
Addendum: And consequently, people should not feel under any obligation other than the immediately practical ‘they will shoot me if I do’ to not oppose them by all possible means.
I’m waiting for the moment the ICEholes (thanks, Roman Moroni) bite off more than they can chew. For an example of such an event, Google “the Battle of Hayes Pond”.
Okay, so the perpetrators in this instance were the KKK, not ICE, but I defy anyone to show me the difference. Both wear masks and harass innocent people of color. If it walks like a duck…
Nazis are still liars. Go figure.