National Guard Troops Aren’t Thrilled About Being Part Of Trump’s Performative War On Protesters
from the we-didn't-sign-up-for-this dept
Trump and his loyalists crave actual martial law. DHS head Kristi Noem has — out loud! — threatened to “liberate” Californians from the democracy they currently enjoy in the state of California. Plenty of idiots and idiot newscasters continue to pretend Los Angeles is under siege when, in reality, protests against ICE have been limited to few blocks in the nation’s largest city by area (contiguous US only, you pedants) and second most populated.
The sending of National Guard troops to “support” ICE raids was pretty much illegal, no matter what Trump might say about the Alien Enemies Act or his desire to treat protected First Amendment activity like an insurrection. It was also entirely performative. The state of California did not request this assistance and local LA law enforcement had already made it clear they had whatever little bit of “violent protesting” under control, which also included all the times LA cops generated violence, rather than merely responded to it.
Nevertheless, the National Guard responded to the president’s directive. Troops were sent to Los Angeles with no real sense of purpose. And also nowhere to sleep or spend their mostly inactive days, as early photos of the deployment clearly showed. For awhile, they weren’t even getting paid because the shoot-first administration wanted to get its show of force on the ground, allowing the actual logistics to remain on the back burner until the populace was sufficiently cowed.
The external backlash began immediately. So did the internal backlash, as Shawn Hubler’s conversations with National Guard troops demonstrates. While they were hailed as heroes for their response to California wildfires earlier this year (something the National Guard is actually prepared to do), troops are facing public ridicule for being the most visible face of Trump’s martial law experimentation.
Protesters jeer the troops as they guard federal office buildings. Commuters curse the behemoth convoys clogging freeways. Family members grill members with questions about whether they really have to obey federal orders.
What happens when you stay enlisted long enough to become the villain against your will?
“They gave Disneyland tickets to the people who worked in the wildfires,” one soldier said. “Nobody’s handing out Disneyland tickets now.”
The National Guard is a branch of the military, which makes simply quitting a luxury that’s out of reach of most volunteers. And the government’s general desire to display a unified front, that hides turmoil barely obscured by official statements, means the troops quoted in this report can’t actually identify themselves or even those enforcing the orders.
While six troops (out of the 3,000 sent to Los Angeles) is too small a sample size to extrapolate widespread disgruntlement, it’s safe to assume a lot of troops aren’t happy they’re being asked to play the villain in furtherance of a goal many are, at the very least, ambivalent about, if not actually opposed to: an untargeted deportation program that seeks to eject as many non-whites from the nation as is humanly possible. Hence the need for more humans, especially humans that already have guns and aren’t allowed to reject reassignment.
Here’s how things are going in this administration’s undeclared war on Los Angeles:
Several said they had raised objections themselves or knew someone who objected, either because they did not want to be involved in immigration crackdowns or felt the Trump administration had put them on the streets for what they described as a “fake mission.”
[…]
At least 105 members of the deployment sought counseling from behavioral health officers, and at least one company commander and one battalion commander who objected to the mission were reassigned to work unrelated to the mobilization, the Guard officers said. Some troops became so disgruntled that there were several reports of soldiers defecating in Humvees and showers at the Southern California base where the troops are stationed, prompting tightened bathroom security.
I do like the fact that shitting in Humvees somehow resulted in “tightened bathroom security.” That sounds like exactly the sort of galaxy brain thinking that might be deployed by officials and officers who are wholly supportive of sending troops to help with deportation just because the president doesn’t like Governor Gavin Newsom. Or maybe it just means troops will be tasked with installing Port-a-Potty latches on Humvee door handles to inform other troops as to which vehicles are currently “OCCUPIED.”
If morale is that low, be thankful your problems are largely limited to unexpected defecation options. For many of those whose enlistment is nearing its end, they’ll soon be free to use their own restrooms and go to work without being blamed for the actions of a rogue president. (Unfortunately, they’ll probably still have to buy their own Disneyland tickets.)
The California National Guard had 72 soldiers whose enlistment was set to expire during the deployment. Of those 72, at least two have now left the Guard and 55 others have indicated that they will not extend their service, according to the office of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is fighting Mr. Trump’s deployment in court.
The military already has a serious retention problem it’s been unable to solve since the last time the draft was implemented. This isn’t going to make things any better. I can guarantee no one got into the military hoping one day they’d be deployed to engage in a war against their fellow Americans. While plenty of troops may not be happy with the places they’ve been deployed over the years, it was never because it put them in the position of potentially having to harm or kill Americans or even immigrants to this country.
The people getting out now are just the leading edge — the early adopters who have the opportunity to do so. More will be leaving and most likely won’t be replaced by anyone you’d actually trust with a uniform and gun. You can’t just wait this presidency out because there’s absolutely no guarantee Trump will be replaced by anyone less authoritarian-leaning. And that’s if he leaves at all, something else that isn’t exactly guaranteed at this point.
We’re all feeling this, but at least someone in charge is willing to say it out loud, even if they won’t put their name on it:
“The moral injuries of this operation, I think, will be enduring,” one of the two Guard officials said. “This is not what the military of our country was designed to do, at all.”
Let’s hope the moral injuries are sufficient to stop what’s happening here. The other options are far, far worse, especially when the most powerful man in the world is clearly trying to provoke a situation that would justify him ordering military members to engage in violence against the people populating the country they serve.
Filed Under: 1st amendment, dhs, ice, martial law, national guard, trump administration


Comments on “National Guard Troops Aren’t Thrilled About Being Part Of Trump’s Performative War On Protesters”
I guess the Trump admin didn’t shit the bed so much as shit in the Humvee.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I dunno how you can write all this about the Trump’s regime’s actions and goals, and still soft-shoe it by calling it the Trump ‘administration’.
You people are living under a mad king. He ain’t administering jack shit.
Re:
I don’t know why you think it matters as much as you fervently believe it does. Would you please explain your thinking to the rest of the class?
Re: Re:
It’s unearned deference.
Re: Re: Re:
Okay, so, I get how you would have a problem with that. But if that’s all this were about, you could easily put together a userscript to replace “administration” with “regime” and fix that problem yourself.
What’s the real reason you keep demanding that Tim Cushing—and pretty much only Tim Cushing—use your preferred language for referring to the Trump administration?
Re: Re: Re:2
I just told you why I think ‘Trump administration’ is the wrong term.
Re: Re: Re:2
Oh, and as for the other part of your inane question: Tim Cushing is a frequent contributor, and one who quite consistently uses the wrong term. When other Techdirt contributors avoid calling it what it is, I do in fact mention it, but you might not see those simply because there’s fewer articles to begin with.
The only other person who puts things up on TD with anything like Cushing’s frequency, AFAICT, is Mike Masnick — who has, in fact, been referring to the Trump regime.
I dunno what conspiratorial reason you’ve been imagining here, but it’s simply numbers and a selection bias on your part.
Re: Re: Re:3
It’s only wrong to you. And unless you’re God or you have a gun to Tim’s head, he doesn’t have to write the way you want him to write.
I’m not imagining anything. You’ve consistently attacked Tim Cushing for weeks over him not using your preferred language as if he has an obligation—moral, if not legal—to refer to the Trump administration as a “regime”. Your “undue deference” reasoning doesn’t cut the mustard here because most of your attention has been trained on Tim’s choice of words more than anyone else’s, including mine. (Tell me I have an obligation to call it a regime. I triple dog dare you.) This feels less like you wanting Trump’s bullshit called what it is and more like you having a personal vendetta against Tim. And if we’re being really real here, it’s weird as fuck of you to pursue that vendetta so publicly by demanding that he use your preferred language. I’m not even trying to kiss Tim’s ass or anything—it’s just weird as all hell to see you demand, over and over and over and over, that he use “regime” instead of “administration”. I mean, is this the only site you do this on, or do you also pull this weirdo schtick on Reddit or Twitter or whatever?
I know this is rich coming from me, but seriously, dude: Get a fucking life.
Re: Re: Re:4
shrug
If you want to live in your head, I can’t stop you. But, in the faint hope that you are in fact willing to listen, I’ll lay it out again, all in one place.
I’ve told you that I think ‘administration’ is a wrong and falsely-normalizing way to refer to a despotic regime. Amongst other things, it implies a continuity and a deference to rules and law that simply aren’t there. And, if it weren’t for the fact that it’s happening in the U.S., I don’t think anyone would hesitate to call it such.
I’ve told you this isn’t a demand, and it’s not; that’s something you’ve invented in order to get mad about this. It is a correction. The goal is not for me to never see Trump’s erratic rule referred to as something it is not (like your vapid user-script suggestion seems to think) but to point out to others that it is in fact okay to use the same language you would about any other dictator about Trump.
I have no vendetta against Mr. Cushing. I am doing this even-handedly and would happily leave a single comment per article that misapplies the language and move on. It’s purely the result of Tim posting a lot and consistently using the wrong term that means most of these comments wind up on his articles. Correcting every single commentator would be a waste of my time, which is why I constrain it to the headliners.
My money is on you straight up ignoring everything I just told you and inserting your own imaginings, but at least I’ve tried. From here on out, don’t expect replies.
Re: Re: Re:5
From where I sit, someone posting the same word (and only that word!) over and over and over on the same writer’s articles for days on end because said someone wants said writer to use that particular phrasing in reference to a particular entity—wants it to the point where it seems like a personal crusade against that writer specifically—looks like a demand. But hey, maybe that’s just me.
Could’ve fooled me.
I’ll point this out to you again: This site is not a fan of Donald Trump. Most of the regular commenters here despise him and his cronies. Hell, I have used “regime” in reference to the Trump administration before. Everyone here knows “regime” is acceptable language when talking about Trump.
But you don’t “correct” them. You didn’t “correct” me for calling the Trump administration exactly that in my prior comment, even after I dared you to try. You only ever “correct” Tim Cushing on his articles by saying one word, a style of comment that carries with it an implicit demand that he write the way you want him to write. That, by the by, is why I refer to your little crusade of “correctness” as a personal vendetta against him.
Okay, and…do you think you need to keep doing it every day on every article Tim Cushing publishes for the remainder of Trump’s time in office? Like, do you think you haven’t made your point clear enough already, given that now you’re being flagged on-sight like you’re a troll? Because in the end, that’s all you’re doing: trolling Tim Cushing like you’re a bored 14-year-old who somehow hasn’t found 4chan yet.
It’s only “the wrong term” to you. That’s why your little crusade is bullshit: Your subjective opinion about the Trump administration (and how to refer to it) is not, and never will be, an objective fact that all people must accept.
If I sound like I’m “imagining” you having a vendetta against Tim Cushing, it’s based only on what you’ve said and done up to this point with your trolling.
Consider the following: You continually post a single word on every one of Tim’s articles to “correct” him. You’ve said in this comments section that you believe Tim is more “incorrect” than other Techdirt writers. If there is a lie in those previous two sentences, show it to me—otherwise, I’m working off what I’ve seen you doing for the past few weeks, and that can’t be handwaved away as “imaginary”, no matter how much you wish it could.
Your trolling schtick comes off as a personal vendetta against Tim Cushing. The evidence is your own trolling—and the comment to which I’m replying. If you didn’t want to be called out on your shitty behavior, you could’ve avoided behaving like like a shithead, but I guess that’s a lesson you’ll have to learn the hard way.
Re: Re: Re:3
‘wrong term’
lol
gtfo with your personal bitchassness, ac
“I can guarantee no one got into the military hoping one day they’d be deployed to engage in a war against their fellow Americans.”
This seems like a catastrophically foolish thing to believe.
Re:
I don’t see how. Maybe there are soldiers across the entire American military who are aching to wage a civil war against “woke leftists” or whatever, but I’d assume that it’s a relatively small number compared to the number of soldiers who don’t want to kill their fellow Americans.
Re: Re: We'll?
So how many Americans has been killed in this “war” you keep banging on about?
Apparently Cushing’s reades are as much insane hyperventilating morons as he is.
Re:
Yeah given I’ve heard that a good chuck of the suckers and losers voted for the person who called them that assuming that none of them are happy with the chance to occupy a US city(so long as it’s run by democrats) seems a bit naive.
Re:
Oh absolutely, there’s plenty of fascists out there who are salivating at the thought of joining the Gestapo.
It won’t matter whether or not they are good soldiers as A) the cruelty is entirely the point, and B) they’re going to need the numbers after getting rid of all those “DEI” folk.
Re: Re:
There are some. I’m not sure about “plenty”.
Even with all the money they’re throwing at ICE and the salaries and bonuses they’re using as incentives, they’re having trouble with recruitment and morale.
And as for the Armed Services, well, most people aren’t shitting in Humvees but that it’s happening often enough that they need to crack down on it is a pretty clear sign of general dissatisfaction.
There are sadists out there who are all too happy to abuse people with the wrong color skin. But there’s also a saturation point, and I suspect we may be reaching it sooner than later.
Re:
Waging war against fellow Americans is something cops want to do. US military members may be just as racist, but they seem to prefer limiting their atrocities to nations other than ours.
If you feel bad for occupying a US city for an oppressive regime, GOOD
‘I feel terrible for being ordered to dropkick puppies every morning on base!’
‘Do you still do it?’
‘Well… yes… but I feel terrible for it!’
I…think that one might have been about the shit in the showers more than the shit in the Humvees, Tim.
Re:
The humvees are now de facto bathrooms, so they’re covered.
Re:
Yeah, you’re probably right.
I guess Tim was going for the editor’s choice on the funny side.
Re:
if an hmmv can’t function as an emergency bathroom, why are we even buying them
As you stated; “The sending of National Guard troops to “support” ICE raids was pretty much illegal…” technically the solders can refuse the order. It was/is an illegal order, you may refuse it. It is in the The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), not that these assholes wouldn’t prosecute you for, ugh, something. As a solder, you take an Oath to The U.S. Constitution, not the president.
Then quit. It doesn’t matter if you don’t like it and still carry it out.
Hmm
Not a fan of Tim Cushings articles anymore. He comes off too emotional and biased. Mike has a much more noticable neutral approach to his articles. I hope to see Tim follow suit soon. I tend to skip over his pieces just becasue of this.
Re: If you're not upset you're not paying attention
Yes, clearly what articles covering the military occupation of US cities by US military forces needs is a lack of emotion and ‘bias'(whatever the hell that means in this situation).
Re:
This is a blog, and he’s writing about the military takeover of a major US city by a fascist president throwing a temper tantrum.
Why the hell wouldn’t he be emotional and biased?
Mike has literally called out corporate journalism for being court stenographers, sticking to “neutral” reporting instead of calling out bullshit when it happens like journalists are supposed to do. Are you new here?
Re:
Thanks for your contribution, guy who hasn’t posted in three years!
(Man, that one troll who thinks it’s a conspiracy every time somebody doesn’t post for a long time but then does is going to be so excited.)
Re:
Then don’t read them. Simples!
Re:
oh my someone is worried that my caustic dragging of an actually fascist administration isn’t “fair” enough. Newsmax will let you watch for free. Get on it, M803.
Then don’t take orders from someone who is not in your chain of command.
Me, the pedant: AKSHUALLY, if we exclude Alaska and incorporated city-counties (it’s #5)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_area] after Houston, OKC, Phoenix, and San Antonio.
Re:
Clickable Link Fail
Re: Re:
Those mother fuckers in Sitka!
Re: Re: Re:
Don’t you mean Novyj Arhangel?
Re:
FYI, contiguous US includes incorporated city-counties (except in Alaska and Hawaii, naturally), which might have strengthened your argument if you hadn’t fallaciously excluded them.
Sure sounds hypocrite to claim wasteful spending now.
No matter how you spin it Trump’s racincid and racist policies on inmigration are the most blatant wasteful spending possible. It costs insane ammounts of money to deport people and it spirals exponentially as Trump scales it up. All for what? We are not getting any more secure, God knows that we are losing freedoms fast and the more successful the racists are at deporting people the more the economy gets stressed. Trump along with every single known racist and white nationalist organizations in the US should be made to pay for the entire cost this crap they wanted or face deportation themselves. Weakwning the US with their racially motivated hatred is the biggest form of treason you could inflict on our nation.
What’s even more frightening is what happens when ICE gets the $ billions in new budget, what kinds of aholes are gonna be lining up to join?
So, troops relieve themselves in showers and Humvees because there weren’t enough appropriate facilities provided, so what does the Trump regime do? Totally misinterpret the reason for the troops’ actions and restrict access to the few facilities that exist rather than provide a sufficient amount of Port-a-Potties.
Real nice fear mongering. Sure wish I could just make shit up and browse headlines to suit my narrative. Where are your references? I didn’t see any listed. No wonder deep blue states look like 3rd world countries. Cope better. I bet you like children and messing your diaper.
Re:
Coming soon to Netflix, learn the story of a young Latina’s struggle to avoid unfair deportation in a politically and economically weakened America in our new series, Blue is the New Red.