Sen. Wyden Wants Answers From The DHS About Its Crime Database Full Of Migrant Children’s DNA
from the because-we're-cruel-bigots-not-likely-to-be-one-of-the-answers dept
To be sure, the DHS is just going to blow off Senator Wyden’s demands for answers, just as it has blown off congressional oversight, court orders, and pretty much the entirety of the US Constitution. (We’re all just waiting to be told we’re obligated to house National Guard troops sent by the administration to whatever state happens to be irritating him at the moment.)
Last month, Dhruv Merota of Wired reported the DHS was now adding DNA collected from migrant children to a criminal database run by the FBI (CODIS [Combined DNA Index System]) and accessible by hundreds of US law enforcement agencies. It was originally created to track dangerous and violent criminals.
Now, for reasons only explained by this administration’s blind hatred of non-white people, more than 133,000 migrant kids (ranging from teens to at least one four-year-old) are now populating a criminal database solely because their parents were undocumented migrants.
DNA is forever and this is a forever database. The government has no obligation to remove anyone from CODIS, which means migrant children are intermingling with dangerous criminals, only a search away from being presumed to be criminals by any law enforcement officer located pretty much anywhere in the United States.
The presumption is that anyone added has been, at the very least, served with criminal charges. But that’s not what happened here. That’s what Ron Wyden’s letter [PDF] makes clear, as he seeks answers he’ll probably never receive from Kristi Noem and/or the multiple immigration-focused agencies she now controls. (h/t Dell Cameron/Wired)
Lots of legitimate concerns are raised by Senator Wyden, starting with this apparent abuse of a criminal database to fill it with a bunch of non-criminal DNA samples.
The Trump administration appears to be broadly detaining individuals and collecting their DNA for permanent storage in CODIS. Reporting also suggests that 97% of noncitizens whose DNA was collected were detained under CBP’s civil authority, and not on any criminal charges.
Of that 97% of non-citizen non-criminals, more than 133,000 were minors, which is something that would normally under a normal regime make these people exempt from DNA collection efforts. Under Trump, however, anyone looking kinda like someone in need of deportation is getting added.
DHS policy states that individuals under the age of 14 are generally exempt from DNA collection, but DHS officials appear to have discretion to collect DNA in certain circumstances. The Executive Branch has not provided any justification for the permanent collection of the children’s DNA samples, or for the storage of children’s genetic information in a system originally designed to ensure public safety from violent criminals.
The end result is this: this DNA collected from migrant children will remain in CODIS forever, accessed every time a law enforcement officer seeks a DNA match from the system. While some people may think this is a victimless crime, the reality is that these kids are treated as criminal suspects during queries (because the database presumes anyone in it is a criminal). When false positives happen (and they will!), innocent children will be treated as criminal suspects despite having done nothing more than… well, being lied to by government agents.
[P]ublic reporting suggests that individuals were not aware of their DNA being collected by federal officials—many individuals thought their cheeks were swabbed by federal agents for the purposes of a COVID-19 test.
Yep, and that’s in addition to the family separation policies deployed by both Trump administrations. Immigration agents have — for several years now — made it a point to break up families, which makes it easier to get migrant kids to do what the government wants without being blocked by parents who might try to invoke their rights or otherwise discourage cooperation with (seemingly unlawful) actions by the US government.
In addition to all of the questions the public deserves answers to, Ron Wyden makes a point that will surely be lost on the fascists currently running the nation.
Governments exercising such broad discretion to involuntarily collect and retain DNA are repressive authoritarian regimes also engaging in gross human rights violations, such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, torture, and more. In fact, the U.S. Government has condemned the involuntary collection of DNA by the People’s Republic of China and has sanctioned entities engaged in this practice, yet this practice appears to be ongoing on our own soil.
Being compared to China with receipts attached is a low point for this nation. But that’s what Trump and his enablers seem to think will finally make America great: domestic surveillance, ethnic cleansing, the silencing of the media, the stripping of public funding from anything that seems remotely altruistic, and deploying the military to “police” cities and states whose the most powerful political figures oppose Trump and his actions. And every bit of info it can collect on the people living in the United States helps, even if its cheek swabs from kids who were told by federal officers they were being checked for possible infections.
Filed Under: 4th amendment, bigotry, dhs, dna, dna database, ice, kristi noem, mass deportation, pam bondi, ron wyden, trump administration


Comments on “Sen. Wyden Wants Answers From The DHS About Its Crime Database Full Of Migrant Children’s DNA”
Regime.
Re:
Two questions.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
The fact that this appears to irritate you personally I count as a small but satisfying bonus. Learn what a demand is before kvetching, you’ll be happier.
Re: Re: Re:
Admitting to be a troll doesn’t win you any points.
Re: Re: Re:
I know what a demand is. I know you’ve spent at least a couple of weeks now demanding that Tim use “regime” instead of “administration”. And I know you’ve been demanding it because you haven’t been phrasing your demand in the form of a request (e.g., “could you maybe…”, “would you mind…”) for some time now, if ever.
Your nitpick bullshit doesn’t work here, son. Speaking as someone who is an asshole more often than he’d like to be: I know when someone’s being a demanding asshole, and that’s what you’ve been to Tim for far too long.
I reiterate my prior questions and add a third: What makes Tim the primary (or even sole) target of your ire on this issue?
Re: Re: Re:
yawn
Re: Re:
As a particularly observant AC wrote last week, since when does someone not have the right to freedom of speech enough to criticize a failing? And as I pointed out myself at that time, telling someone to read another site is effectively telling them to not post here, which may not interfere with their free speech rights on a constitutional level, but nonetheless does seek to interfere with their right to speak on this particular platform. If you don’t like what they say, you’re free to ignore (not associate with) them.
Re: Re: Re:
They can criticize what they perceive to be a failing. What sucks for them is a simple fact: I have the same right.
I don’t read sites that I know will piss me off just so I can hate-comment on them. If someone wants a site to cater exclusively to their preferences/demands, it tells me that said someone has an issue with the site (or a specific writer) that goes beyond their demand and reading a different site might do them some good. At the bare minimum, if they’re so upset about this one word, they can probably put together a slapdash userscript to change every instance of “Trump administration” to “Trump regime” and bring themselves some semblance of inner peace.
They don’t have that right. Nobody does. And yes, “nobody” includes me. I am not excluded from “fuck ’em” when relevant.
Re: Re: Re:2
Yes you do. What you don’t have the right to do is tell someone to get off someone else’s property as you have done. Get it? Got it? Good.
Re: Re: Re:3
Honk. Wrong. Speech is speech.
Here’sone for you: Shut the fuck up. You aren’t good at this.
Re: Re: Re:4
Honk. Wrong. Only the owner of the property has the right to tell others to get off their property or to deputize others to do so, and Stephen has not been so deputized.
” I worry that such broad DNA surveillance led by your Departments may result in the over-policing of immigrant communities and deter them from seeking out essential services.”
A main point of what they are up to. Because, you know, we can’t have immigrant children being taken care of with US taxpayer money. How will we all be rich, if they do? /s
Re:
Even if those migrant children are US citizens, because they were born in the USA. The US should retroactively revoke the citizenships of everyone who received it through birth rights over the last 250 years, including their children!
You’re making a mistake here, it never has been Trump’s goal to make common citizens richer… Billionaires should get richer especially He Himself!
Re: Re:
Maybe you should read more carefully before commenting. If you had done so, you wouldn’t have missed Pixelation’s very clear sarc mark.
Why wouldn’t they? Even when Dems were in power, they didn’t use it to enforce things like contempt. And there is little evidence they’ve realized why that’s a problem if/when we get out of this.
Ooof
Yikes. America mate, whatcha doing? This is big yikes.
Looks like it’s time to donate to PBS and NPR. Let’s keep them going in spite of Droopy Don and his cabal.
Re:
How dare you call them a “cabal”! They’re not caballing anything! It’S a ReGiMe!!!1!
🙃
Well. That’s a lot of DNA processing. Wonder who will be doing that? And for how much? Also is there money laundering?
Still not processing them rape kits and other criminal evidence tho’.