Trump Illegally Purges FTC’s Democratic Commissioners, Gutting What’s Left Of Agency Independence
from the the-purges-will-continue-until-loyalty-improves dept
In an unprecedented move that flatly violates federal law, Donald Trump on Tuesday fired both Democratic commissioners from the Federal Trade Commission — Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya. The illegal purge represents a direct assault on the independence of the consumer protection agency.
While presidents have always wielded influence over independent agencies through their power to appoint chairs and maintain three to two partisan majorities, the law explicitly protects commissioners from being fired without cause. Trump’s attempt to remove Slaughter and Bedoya — apparently for nothing more than being Democrats who might question his agenda — shows a complete disregard for these vital safeguards.
It is customary for the chair to step down when a new administration of a different party comes in, and former FTC chair Lina Khan obliged and left as Donald Trump was inaugurated. Apparently having that typical 3 to 2 majority was not enough for Trump. In the Trump/Musk world of unlimited, unrestrained executive power, apparently any Democratic voice must be purged.
Both put out statements calling out the illegality of such a move. Here’s Slaughter’s statement:
I woke up this morning, as I have every day for nearly the last seven years, eager to get to work on behalf of the American people to make the economy more honest and fair. But today the President illegally fired me from my position as a Federal Trade Commissioner, violating the plain language of a statute and clear Supreme Court precedent. Why? Because I have a voice. And he is afraid of what I’ll tell the American people.
The law protects the independence of the Commission because the law serves the American people, not corporate power. The reason that the FTC can be so effective for the American people is because of its independence and because its commissioners serve across political parties and ideologies. Removing opposition voices may not change what the Trump majority can do, but it does change whether they will have accountability when they do it. The administration clearly fears the accountability that opposition voices would provide if the President orders Chairman Ferguson to treat the most powerful corporations and their executives—like those that flanked the President at his inauguration—with kid gloves.
I have served across administrations, including during the last Trump administration, and throughout my entire time as a commissioner I applied the same criteria in my work: that the law must be enforced without fear or favor. I have dedicated myself to executing the Commission’s statutory mandate to protect consumers and promote competition, fighting against illegal business practices that make groceries more expensive, healthcare inaccessible, and compromise people’s privacy and security; it has been my greatest honor to serve.
And here’s Bedoya’s statement:
I’m a commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission. The president just illegally fired me.
The FTC is an independent agency founded 111 years ago to fight fraudsters and monopolists. Our staff is unafraid of the Martin Shkrelis and Jeff Bezos of the world. They take them to court and they win.
Now, the president wants the FTC to be a lapdog for his golfing buddies.
Together with Chair Lina Khan and Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, I spent my time at the FTC fighting for small town grocers and pharmacists and for people in Indian country going hungry because food was too expensive. I fought for workers getting screwed on pay and benefits and overtime. I fought for their right to organize. I fought tech companies who think they can track you and your kids every hour of every day so they can pocket their next billion.
Whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat or someone who’s so disgusted with Washington you can barely watch the news, the FTC has worked for you.
Who will Trump’s FTC work for? Will it work for the billionaires? Or will it work for you?
It was an honor to serve my country at the FTC. It was an honor to work alongside its staff.
And to everyone who is watching all of this unfold, don’t be scared. Fight back.
Tomorrow I will testify before the Colorado Joint House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and will have more to say then.
The conventional wisdom is that Trump’s move is plainly illegal under Humphrey’s Executor, the 1935 Supreme Court case establishing that FTC commissioners can only be fired for cause. But there are growing signals that today’s Supreme Court would love nothing more than to demolish that precedent. And really, why wouldn’t they? The whole concept of “independent” agencies has always existed in a kind of constitutional twilight zone. This Court has shown increasing hostility toward the independence of administrative agencies, and Trump’s illegal purge provides the perfect vehicle for further consolidating executive power — though, of course, that only applies when Republicans are in charge.
The writing has been on the wall for months. Despite JD Vance’s cynical embrace of Khan’s anti-monopoly stance, the MAGA movement was never actually interested in reining in corporate power — they just wanted to ensure that power answered to Trump. Khan’s departure was inevitable, but firing the remaining Democratic commissioners shows this goes beyond normal political transitions into dangerous new territory.
But now illegally firing both Slaughter and Bedoya once again shows that in this Trump administration even the most basic safeguards are gone, and anyone who does not kiss Trump and Musk’s asses at every moment is going to be gone.
The next moves are depressingly predictable. Trump likely won’t even bother nominating new Democratic commissioners. While 15 USC 41 requires partisan balance (“Not more than three of the Commissioners shall be members of the same political party”), the FTC can legally function with a quorum of just two commissioners. Why would Trump fill those seats when he can simply let the FTC operate as a rubber stamp for his agenda? After all, this fits perfectly with new FTC chair Andrew Ferguson’s stated plan to weaponize the agency against Trump’s perceived enemies.
The ripple effects are already visible across other agencies. At the FCC, Democratic Commissioner Geoffrey Starks has suddenly announced his decision to leave, though it’s unclear whether he also faced threats of forced removal if he didn’t remove himself. This leaves just one Democrat, Anna Gomez — and that may only be because the FCC’s three-commissioner quorum requirement means Trump needs her vote to enable Brendan Carr’s ongoing crusade against tech companies. At least until the Senate confirms another Republican.
There’s a certain terrifying, but clarifying, honesty to all this. For decades we’ve maintained the polite fiction that “independent” agencies were actually independent, that partisan balance requirements meant something, that institutional guardrails would hold.
Now Trump has simply declared that fiction dead, and it turns out there’s not much anyone can do about it. The Supreme Court could theoretically step in to defend Humphrey’s Executor. But they won’t. Congress could theoretically exercise oversight. But they won’t. The press could explain how this is a huge attack on the checks and balances of government. But they won’t.
So we’re left with a situation where “independent” agencies are independent right up until they’re not, where statutory requirements for partisan balance are meaningful right up until they’re ignored, and where commissioners serve fixed terms right up until they’re fired for insufficient loyalty. It’s not a great system. But at least now, thanks to these firings, we’re being honest about how it actually works. Without even the fig leaf of token opposition to maintain the illusion of normalcy, we can finally admit what we’re actually dealing with: a corrupt and broken system of pretend checks and balances that only worked until someone decided not to be checked or balanced.
Filed Under: alvaro bedoya, donald trump, ftc, humprhey's executor, independent agency, lina khan, rebecca kelly slaughter


Comments on “Trump Illegally Purges FTC’s Democratic Commissioners, Gutting What’s Left Of Agency Independence”
That’s a nice way of saying there’s no stopping the mass-censorship now aside from forcing the courts to do the right thing.
Re:
Tough luck. How about we get that impeachment thing going?
Re: Re:
Neoliberal democrats are too busy fighting against progressives and helping conservatives gut our institutions to do anything like hold the president accountable. Conservatives and Republicans are a lost cause up-front.
So who, exactly, is going to get impeachment going? The half-dozen progressives that the DNC has allowed to exist in their ranks?
Re: Re: Re:
Eh, if they shoot section 230 dead, or pass something like KOSA, there won’t be anywhere online to press them to impeach Trump anyway.
Might as well back up things and hunker down untill the apocalypse has passed.
Re: Re: Re:2
If they kill 230, then we fight back by suing Trump and Musk for every provably counter-factual claim on Truth Social and ExTwitter.
A bluff never called becomes reality, and he's doing a whole lot of bluffing...
Now Trump has simply declared that fiction dead, and it turns out there’s not much anyone can do about it. The Supreme Court could theoretically step in to defend Humphrey’s Executor. But they won’t. Congress could theoretically exercise oversight. But they won’t. The press could explain how this is a huge attack on the checks and balances of government. But they won’t.
Here’s an idea, and it applies to more than just this particular instance: Stop treating illegal orders as valid ones just because the convicted felon president or his attack DOGE issue them.
If he doesn’t have the legal authority to fire commissioners like that then they should just keep doing their job and dare him to try to enforce the order, calling his bluff and forcing him to either back down or demonstrate that his ‘authority’ is nothing more than ‘might makes right’ and has no legal backing rather than playing along with the pretense that he has the authority he’s claiming here and by doing so legitimizing it.
The ongoing overthrow of the government has been so effective not just because the politicians on both sides are tellingly silent(albeit for different reasons, cowardice and corruption respectively) but because time and time again people and even entire agencies have played along and just accepted that the laws and constitution don’t matter in the face of someone who asserts they have authority that overrides both issuing demands or orders.
Re:
“Working” without access, an office, or pay is not everyone’s idea of making best use of their time and work.
To get anywhere with that approach, you need to have the whole department and security and law enforcement and accounting play along with ignoring illegal orders, and that is a tough demand for those whose livelihood is not (yet) on the line.
Many have enough of a sense of responsibility for their subordinates that they don’t demand this from them.
You do remember that all Department of Justice workers who were appointed to work on some Trump case got fired?
You need a whole lot of people to call the bluff before it breaks down, and at some point it is hard to distinguish from an insurrection, or if you want to, a counterinsurrection.
How much civil war is your job worth to you?
Re: Re: This quote is still relevant
Sometime, people who want to avoid a full conflagration, have to act accordingly — and time is running out.
Also: those higher up in the hierarchy are supposedly in those positions because they hold more responsibility for what happens.
Re: Re: Re:
Yeah, there is the companies who went along with the Nazis and did thei bidding and exploited forced work and thrived on it, that aren’t viewed kindly by the history books and have historic commissions saying “nostra culpa” and pay some reparations now that few viable recipients remain.
And then there are those who took a stand and were wiped from history before anybody bothered keeping track too much.
The history books just record a few select heroes. People who put up a temporary fuss for wanting to do their job right and got their coworkers into trouble aren’t recorded there.
Who is prepared to pull a Molon labe for his office binders?
Re: Re: Re:2 'First they came for...', why does that sound familiar...
If you’re not willing to stand up to evil and prefer to keep your head down and your job for as long as you can keep it while they go after others don’t be surprised when your turn comes around and your protestations of innocence and how it’s not right what’s being done to you are met with a resounding silence by those around you who, just like you, prioritize their own jobs over trying to stop the ongoing disaster.
And here I’M being called a doomposter. Which I suppose is true, but I don’t see how the writing of this article helps any either.
Re:
I haven’t seen the “doomposting” complaints for a while now. I have to assume folks realized some of the worse predictions were accurate, and that pretending otherwise actually wasn’t something that was good for anyone.
Re: Re:
It’s probably less about that and more about the admins tightening up moderation of the comments sections.
Re: Re: Re: I was wondering why I got excluded from posting here.
Thanks Stephen.
I guess my comment about the Dems being Republican Minions now was simply too ‘rude’. 🙂
There is something...
WHY pay taxes, if they are Closing all of the departments??
Become a democrat, and with no Federal representation?? PAY NO TAX.
If the Gov. isnt working for the Masses.. NO TAX for the rich.
Trump dont like taxes, so Why should we Pay taxes? they cut them for the rich and thats About Less than 25% of the nation. The OTHER 75% wants a FAIR TAX. So since they dont pay, why should we?
Re: good luck with that as a pleb
I agree in spirit but I know the repercussions of not paying my taxes. I’m not rich enough to not pay and still keep my paycheck.
Re: Re:
Don’t worry, they’re disbanding the IRS, so nobody will come after you. This is more efficient and will help the deficit somehow.
Re: Re: Re:
In general, that won’t work. If you’re legally employed in the USA, your employer is almost certainly remitting taxes on your behalf—usually more than you actually owe. And telling the government exactly how much they paid you; whatever IRS systems auto-generate and auto-mail letters when you don’t pay will keep running as long as the government keeps paying the electricity bills (which, admittedly, isn’t a given). Anyway, for most people, all that happens if they don’t file is they don’t get their refund.
Small business owners could refuse to pay, but they don’t have fancy lawyers. The IRS still does (Trump’s buddies need “work”), and they’re still taking the easy cases. Whereas the type of company that discovers things like the “Double Irish” loophole probably has the funds to fight the IRS, and the whole thing’s so confusing that few people at the IRS can deal with it. (And, maybe not coincidentally, they tend to give a lot of money to political candidates.)
There is, however, an easy way to legally avoid income tax: keep your income low. For obvious reasons, very few people do that, but there’s a documented history of people trying to “live simply” just to avoid paying for wars. Some even get money from the government, effectively having a negative tax rate.
Re:
Unfortunately, very few of them agree on what “fair” means. It has almost as many definitions as there are people.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Not illegal if a legal fiction
deceptive headline. No one knows what an independent agency is. It can’t be an illegal action and a legal fiction. I guess we will find out what it is soon enough
Re:
That’s a cute massive mind-reading trick you think you performed there.
Re:
Hey do you also do fortune cookie sayings?
Re:
True. I have absolutely no idea that an independent agency, in this context, is one that does not have to answer to the Federal Government.
The Big Question
How much is all this cost savings going to cost us?
Re:
Doesn’t matter as long as it is all the other people’s fault.
“We uncovered fraud so massive you wouldn’t believe it and had to stop it.”
“I don’t believe it.”
“Told you so.”
Well, that was a mistake. Trump doesn’t respect such “customs”, and we knew that ahead of time. People should’ve just… not stepped down. If Trump wants to fire them, fine; they can maybe get severance pay.
“Together with Chair Lina Khan and Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, I spent my time at the FTC fighting for small town grocers and pharmacists and for people in Indian country going hungry because food was too expensive. I fought for workers getting screwed on pay and benefits and overtime. I fought for their right to organize. I fought tech companies who think they can track you and your kids every hour of every day so they can pocket their next billion”
No wonder he got he fired. He obviously sux at his job. Then on top of that, he wants to trash talk the president? FTC can do better