Trump FCC Boss Declares All Racism In Broadband Deployment Magically Solved, Proclaims To End Agency’s Civil Rights Reforms
from the anti-discrimination-is-discrimination dept
The 2021 infrastructure bill earmarked $42.5 billion in broadband subsidies that will be coming to the states starting this year. But it also tasked the FCC with creating rules surrounding “digital discrimination,” or the practice of big telecoms refusing to evenly deploy next-generation broadband to low income and minority neighborhoods (despite receiving untold billions in taxpayer funds to do exactly that).
Studies have repeatedly found that companies like AT&T routinely refuse to deliver next-generation fiber to marginalized communities, despite billions in subsidies, regulatory favors, tax breaks, merger approvals, and other favors. Reporters have also found that big ISPs routinely charge minority neighborhood residents more money for slower speeds than their less diverse, more affluent neighbors.
So in 2023 the FCC did what Congress asked: it created some very basic new rules governing digital discrimination. I wrote a whole feature for it for The Verge (now paywalled). The short version: digital equity folks were mixed on the implementation because it didn’t really call out big companies by name, or actually do much of anything about past instances of broadband deployment discrimination.
But it did involve the federal government acknowledging for the first time that such discrimination exists, which was a big deal for future policy. And it also involved requiring that the FCC do a better job uniformly mapping broadband access, so that the billions we spend on broadband deployment isn’t wasted, spent redundantly, or exclude minority, lower income, tribal, or marginalized folks.
This, you may be unsurprised to learn, upsets Big Telecom lobbyists and the bigots in the Trump administration. So new FCC boss Brendan Carr has issued a statement saying he’s ending the FCC’s diversity initiatives, mothballing all their websites, disbanding the agency’s “digital discrimination taskforce,” and basically declaring the problem of racial discrimination in broadband effectively solved:
“As Chairman of the FCC, I have concluded that the work of the FCC’s Communications Equity and Diversity Council is complete.”
Carr’s announcement is very typical Orwellian “up is down, right is left,” authoritarian speak, proclaiming that he’s eliminating efforts to improve broadband subsidy efficiency under the guise of efficiency. And that he’s ending efforts to stop broadband discrimination in order to stop discrimination:
“Chairman Carr will focus the agency’s work on competently carrying out the Commission’s statutory mission, as defined by Congress, without promoting invidious forms of discrimination.”
Congress literally told the FCC to build the things Carr is dismantling to end racism, under the flimsy pretence those efforts are themselves racist. It’s gibberish.
Carr is following the lead of the Trump “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing,” executive order, which takes aim at Biden’s Executive Order 13985 directing federal agencies to create DEI programs. But as some telecom experts are quick to point out, many of the initiatives he’s eliminating have nothing to do with “DEI”:
“What Carr calls the ‘DEI Equity Action Plan’ is actually just the ‘Equity Action Plan’ and has no connection to the Biden DEIA Executive Order, or to any staff/operations issues,” Bill Callahan, the director of Connect Your Community, told CNET.”
In fact in his statement, Carr appears to have just thrown “DEI” in front of a bunch of disparate (and some duplicative) efforts to try and bullshit around the fact that many of these efforts were not DEI, and were quite useful:

In case you’re new to the great, dumb, modern American experience, right wing propagandists have decided to call any popular civil rights reforms “DEI.” They hijacked the term from academia and half-assed corporate initiatives so they can portray all civil rights reforms as the wasteful, inefficient playthings of coastal academic elites. It’s a way to downplay and normalize being giant fucking racist assholes, and pretend that eliminating popular civil rights is “efficient reform.”
But again, many of these FCC initiatives were good programs that helped the FCC be more efficient about the funding and even deployment of affordable broadband access, which is good for everyone. Including Trump voters who were deluded into believing that guys like Brendan Carr care about the working class.
The problem for Carr is that the underlying law that required the creation of many of these programs (the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) still exists, so they’ll have to do a lot of tapdancing to explain why they’re ignoring or violating the law. That may not be a huge problem given the number of corrupt MAGA and Big Telecom friendly judges currently on the bench, but I’m not sure it will be all that simple, either.
The actual digital discrimination rules Trump folks want to eliminate are in the process of being challenged in the Eighth Circuit by the telecom industry. Congress tasked the FCC with prohibiting discrimination in broadband deployment based on “race, ethnicity, color, religion, national origin, and income level.”
This will require time, favorable court rulings, and a fully stocked appointment of commissioners to unwind, and neither Carr nor Trump can simply wish it all away with a snap.
Brendan Carr was definitely brought on board by Trump to eliminate civil rights protections and harass any tech, media, or telecom company that doesn’t bend the knee to authoritarian power.
But his primary job remains to take an axe to any oversight requirements giant shitty telecoms don’t like, and they very much don’t like people pointing out they’ve received billions and billions of dollars in exchange for half-cooked, expensive, uncompetitive broadband networks unevenly deployed.
Filed Under: brendan carr, broadband, civil rights, dei, discrimination, donald trump, fcc, red lining


Comments on “Trump FCC Boss Declares All Racism In Broadband Deployment Magically Solved, Proclaims To End Agency’s Civil Rights Reforms”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I already voted for Trump...
Your article reinforces the validity of supporting Trump. Simple question: How’s Biden’s 42 billion dollar plan to provide broadband going?
Re:
Only if you’re a segregationist like him (and co-president Elon Musk).
Re:
So, you’re one of those assholes…
Re:
Remember this when the deficit goes up by trillions. You chose to throw shit at random trees, ignoring the forest.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Oh lord.
It will be fun watching you kill yourself after your parents and children are dead
Re:
“The plans of my political rivals did not immediately solve all of the world’s problems for zero dollars, therefore my support for a fascist takeover is entirely justified!”
Re:
I realize your an asshole, but please explain how you can look around at what Trump has done in the first week and think ‘Yep, this is the exact kind of spiteful incompetent that the county needs’? I don’t get it.
Re:
Son people here can see the stupid shit you are writing.
Scene: an emergency room at a DC hospital sometime in 2027. An ambulance roars into the parking lot, and EMTs unload the patient on a gurney and wheel him into the ER, where a team is standing by.
EMT #1: “Car accident. Patient’s name is Brendan Carr”.
The Vietnamese trauma surgeon looks at the lesbian physician’s assistant who looks at the Nigerian orthopedist who looks at the gay Latino cardiologist who looks at the Malaysian nurse.
Surgeon: “Coffee break now?”
The team exits, leaving the patient alone in the room. (Curtain falls)
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Even in your wildest fantasies, the women are still in assistant roles.
Re: Re:
You assumed that the trauma surgeon and the orthopedist were men and that the nurse was a woman.
I didn’t specify their genders. It was a litmus test, of sorts.
So thank you for clarifying that you’re a misogynist thug.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
Only women can be lesbians and almost 90% of nurses are women. Hush now, child.
Re: Re: Re:2
Ah, so you’re not only a misogynist thug, you have reading comprehension issues. Not surprising, really.
By the way, and I know that you won’t grasp this but since others are reading this: about 12% of nurses in the US are men…so the percentage of woman is in fact not over 90%.
Re: Re: Re:3
Not to defend the other guy too much, but he didn’t say the percentage was over 90, he said it was almost 90. Which it is if 12% of nurses are men.
So:
Pot, kettle.
Re: Re: Re:4
Way to defend a misogynistic, trans-denying thug, dipshit.
Re: Re: Re:
Even the PA might not be a cis lesbian.
But i wanna group all the things with other things i always associate them with because my mind only has two drawers for categories which i choose to impose!
Re: Re:
Only the physician’s assistant and cardiologist’s genders were implied (female and male, respectively) with zero gender information given about the pther people in the emergency team, so you not only used the language of inclusion to exclude women from important roles in the first AC’s scenario, you also completely ignored the possibility that non-binary people could also effectively fulfill any those roles.
Carr: I’ve checked, all rich white males I know have a decent internet connection. Mission accomplished!
Re:
Carr: What do you mean ‘What about everyone else?’, I counted everyone that matters!
Welp, we did it everyone! We solved racism!
…By reintroducing racism..
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
The Colorblind Cant Discriminate
The only way to accomplish this is to stop obsessing over racial identity. When you embrace identity politics, you are the racist.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Well said, Sir.
Given that black people and many other minorities are inherently inferior to Whites, progressives would be better off shutting up about the whole thing rather than constantly braying for reparations and other official discrimination.
Re: Re:
Fuck off, racist scumbag
Re: Re: Re:
On the internet, nobody can tell if you are sarcastic or not. I’m willing to give the GP the benefit of the doubt in this particular case.
However, the Rule of Goats still applies. Without the “benefit of the doubt”, your comment is certainly valid.
Re: Re:
Imagine sucking up to reek.
That’s beyond pathetic son.
Re:
Sounds like you’re as dumb as Carr is.
Re:
This is, of course, a shockingly stupid take. You can’t improve something if you don’t measure.
Re:
“I’m in an interracial marriage, and I’ve learned a lot I would have never known. I one time told Brandi, ‘I don’t have a racist bone’—I said, ‘I don’t see color.’ And she said, ‘Well then, you don’t see my experience.’ And I thought, ‘Oh, that’s…you’re right. I can’t just say that.’ You need to be able to see that experience and at least understand it.” — Cody Rhodes
You can’t and won’t stop discrimination by ignoring it. The “obsession” over race that you accuse liberals/leftists of having pales in comparison to the obsession actual racists have over race. Color-blindness is an ideal borne of a dream, but in reality, that dream won’t be achieved by declaring racism to be “over” for any reason. And before you go quoting MLK, let me remind you that his bit about judging people by the content of their character was in the context of him talking about his children, not about the entirety of the human race.
Re:
This is why you’re called reek
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
You on the identitarian Left will stop at nothing to make EVERTHING about race, while I, a normal, hard-working, tax-paying citizen, am glad that any “racial” problems in broadband deployment have been solved.
Re:
The problem is this: the problems haven’t been solved.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Says you–a know-nothing partisan. I trust the Experts like the head of the FCC!
Re: Re: Re:
go away hyman
Re: Re: Re:
I’m guessing you’re the kind of person who would’ve spit at a government employee before Trump won. FYI: His winning the presidency didn’t magically end racism of any kind, and declarations of any such victory are meaningless without empirical data to back them up.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Trump was the candidate of choice for non-black minorities! (No surprise, since blacks are the dumbest group with the lowest IQs.)
Re: Re: Re:3
Ok pizza cutter.
Re:
Is identitarian like pescatarian?
Like you only eat food you can identify?
'I'm not racist, you're racist for claiming I am!'
And that he’s ending efforts to stop broadband discrimination in order to stop discrimination:
Ah yes, the ‘Pointing out my/my friend’s racism is itself racist‘ argument, or as I believe it’s known in academic circles the ‘I know you are but what am I?’