Trump Continues To Gut Meaningful Gov’t Oversight, Fires At Least 15 Inspectors General
from the all-Smithers-all-the-time-in-the-Oval-Office dept
The Trump Administration is apparently going to be a law unto itself. There have been plenty of people put up against the wall in recent days, but the weekend concluded with Donald Trump — perhaps illegally — firing at least 15 Inspectors General. This mass firing leaves the Defense Department, State Department, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Social Security Administration without anyone in charge of internal investigations. Also affected are the departments of Transportation, Health and Human Services, Interior, Commerce, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, and Labor. The EPA and Small Business Administration IGs were also fired.
Donald Trump is, of course, a stupid narcissist and aspiring fascist. So of course he would claim this unprecedented (and illegal!) mass culling of the IG herd is just the normal stuff one does when elected king president.
“It’s a very common thing to do,” Trump claimed to reporters on Air Force One traveling to Florida, in his first comments after a decision that caused alarm among government watchdogs and members of Congress.
Is it, though? Pretty much everyone and everything else begs to differ.
The dismissals appeared to violate federal law, which requires Congress to receive 30 days’ notice of any intent to fire a Senate-confirmed inspector general.
Violating federal law like this is not a “very common thing to do.” I mean, I would hope not. We’ve never seen this before, so it’s safe to say most presidents don’t follow up their inauguration with illegal acts. As the Washington Post report notes, this move even managed to upset some Trump loyalists.
This move also upset people Trump and his party personally appointed during his last term in office. But it shouldn’t have surprised them. Trump’s short-term-only memory makes it impossible for him to remember anyone that hasn’t made him consistently happy throughout the entirety of his political career. Here he is weighing in on the many personal appointees he just unceremoniously (and illegally!) fired:
“I don’t know them,” he said, even though many of those he fired were people that he appointed during his first term. “But some people thought that some were unfair or some were not doing their job. It’s a very standard thing to do.”
To be fair, with the exception of DHS IG Joseph Cuffari (someone who has himself been under investigation for years and who was found to have engaged in misconduct), most of the IGs weren’t Trump loyalists in the classic sense, which explains the president’s willingness to kick them to the curb during this latest wave of “drain the swamp but replace it with an even murkier swap” efforts.
Unfortunately for Trump, this isn’t going to go as smoothly as he apparently believes it will. A lot of the fired Inspectors General know the law and plan to keep showing up for work until they’re given proper notice and the 30 days to vacate that the law mandates. A late Friday night purge (the HHS IG received notice at 11:45 pm) is not exactly a confidence builder. And even Trump, a man seemingly incapable of feeling shame, realized it was best to do this as late as possible to avoid the sort of scrutiny that comes when you kill massive amounts of accountability in broad daylight on a work day.
Filed Under: department of defense, donald trump, epa, government oversight, hhs, inspector general, ssa, state department


Comments on “Trump Continues To Gut Meaningful Gov’t Oversight, Fires At Least 15 Inspectors General”
But… why?
What’s even the point?
Re:
Corruption cannot survive when oversight is present or those pretending to oversee things have not pledged fealty to the dear leader
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
—- IG’s are not some noble “independent” watchdogs protecting American citizens from government corruption and inefficiency
They are merely a useless archaic layer of bureaucratic ‘control’ of the underlings within a government agency, as directed by the agency head
IG’s serve at the pleasure of the agency’s top boss and report directly report to him.
IG ‘boatrockers’ are rare and soon find themselves out if a job.
Re: Re: Re: Bureaucracy is annoying but important
Hey dingdong, pop quiz.
1. Which is easier to corrupt/commit fraud upon:
a) One official with little oversight.
b) A department of officials with systems in place that create oversight.
2. (True/False) Do you want the US to be hollowed out by crooks?
Re: Re: Re:
So you really think our only alternative is to put Phony Stark–I mean, Elon Musk in charge? Who am I kidding, you don’t think about it beyond cheap gotchas
Re: Re: Re:2
It’ll be the only thing he gets cheap.
I’m stocked up on rations and construction materials. Let’s see how it plays out for the people who screamed memes in lieu of preparing.
Re: Re: Re:
Pace yourself bro. You’ve got up to four years of defending shit way dumber and more egregious than this.
Re:
The Trump administration wants to make committing crimes easier for them.
Re: Re:
you think there is that much coherent thought behind the action?
Re: Re: Re:
From Trump? Possible but unlikely. From the GOP in general? Yes.
Re:
What do you mean, “what’s the point?”? Removing oversight is not a point in itself. It is preparation for actions which you don’t want to perform under oversight.
The question is whether those actions will be timed to happen before nominal oversight is being restored, or whether they will happen under “oversight” of sycophants to be installed into those positions.
Yet another option is to install “witch hunters” which will use their formal task description of oversight for bullying out any workers not into turning their institution into some fascist tool or facade.
Trump is not selective. He is willing to refunction any tool or mechanism to do his bidding, using whatever excuse or legal authority may be made to work.
Re: Re:
Or in this case, illegal authority.
Re: Re: Re:
If it was really illegal according to our system, he wouldn’t be allowed to do it. Yet oh look, there he goes doing it.
Why it’s almost as if the whole “legal/illegal” thing only ever applied to peons and never the ruling class.
Re: Re: Re:2
Murder isn’t allowed according to your system, either, yet that happens all the time.
Very few things are prevented from happening before they happen.
Re: Re: Re:3
Presidential oversight is done by Congress, and right now Congress majorities pretty much are Trump sycophants (he used the last primary season to make sure of that as far as possible).
Any Republicans who dare cross Trump will be painted with the “RINO” swash and be singled out for the kind of suggestive talk that led Trump’s private brigadiers to storm the Capitol. Trump hasn’t just pardoned pretty much all of the convicted criminals but has also at least commuted the sentences affecting their command structure and has rendered them completely operative again and doubly willing to act his bidding.
There will be domestic terrorist acts against Republicans not falling in line, and of course also against Democrats.
So while illegal acts by Trump will likely trigger a few hiccups at the beginning, expect Congress to completely cease any oversight attempts soon enough.
With the Supreme Court having absolved the judiciary from interfering with Trump, he can now use criminal (or at least mob boss) means for keeping tabs on Congress in order to stop any pretense of being anything but royalty.
Re: Re: Re:4
yawns
Re: Re: Re:4
“and right now Congress majorities pretty much are Trump sycophants” coughs barely a majority and of course your gonna say all right wingers are sycophants just like a far left nut
Re: Re: Re:5
You seeing congressional Republicans giving Trump’s antics a lot of pushback right now, are you?
I want whatever you’re having, then.
Re: Re: Re:5
Could you give us a list of the Congressional Republicans who aren’t acting in a sycophantic manner right now? I’m genuinely curious who they are.
Re: Re: Re:5
Thank you for finally exposing your true allegiance. I knew there was a reason you were “white knighting” for this site along with a named user.
Re: Re: Re:4
“With the Supreme Court having absolved the judiciary from interfering with Trump, he can now use criminal (or at least mob boss) means for keeping tabs on Congress in order to stop any pretense of being anything but royalty.” david take off your tin foil hat bro
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:5
cuase trump is still being sued so your lying david
“It’s a very common thing [for me] to do,” Trump claimed….
Fixed that for him 🙂
Seems that Donald has step into a Chesterton fence.
Someone here to explain to him why he cannot mess with things that are correctly what they’re supposed to be?
Re:
The Emperor may be naked, but if you call him on it, he can still have the city guard make you a head shorter.
Rapist and convicted criminal Donald Trump continues to do the bidding of his master (Putin). Dismantling effective oversight of large portions of the federal government serves Putin’s interests quite nicely.
Re:
Putin is not Trump’s master but his puppeteer. Trump acts under his own volition, but that is easily manipulated, and Putin is good at manipulation. The difference is that a servant may be resentful while Trump is proud acting out what he is being played for.
Why not? He’s already a convicted felon.
It doesn’t matter how “smoothly it goes” so long as it does in fact go. And since everyone in DC only cares enough to make a few “concerned” statements to the press and not stop any of it, it’s definitely going.
'How dare you disobey your King?!'
A lot of the fired Inspectors General know the law and plan to keep showing up for work until they’re given proper notice and the 30 days to vacate that the law mandates.
It’s nice to see that at least someone in DC has a spine, I look forward to convicted felon Trump’s tantrum over the fact that they refused to follow his orders just because they were illegal.
Some context:
A lot of the above is sourced to a Vox article that one can hope was itself well sourced.
Re:
so it’s normal?
Re: Re:
[presidents in general] Didn’t say that.
[Trump in particular] we’ve got two matching data points. Three if you count Reagan’s 1981 thing. But Cheeto Supreme is in a class of one.
Re: Re:
Note that it’s primarily Republican presidents.
Re: Re:
It seems to me that firing over a dozen IGs with no warning is not normal, no.
Re: Re:
That’s what you took from that?
It’s insane to me that he can just DO that. He has no authority to, but for some reason everyone is just… Going along with it?
What the fuck are we supposed to do when nobody seems willing to question hese overreaches?
Re:
Kevin McCarthy was the first to do the pilgrimage to Mar Lago after January 6th. Since then, the GOP has been on a long road of normalization and shrugging shoulders, culminating in nominating of all people Donald Trump for president, the thing that would not leave. And the voters validated their choice to normalize.
What are they supposed to do now? Suddenly start objecting to criminal behavior? That would make them look like they were full of shit all the time.
They went all in, and they are in over their heads.