Analysts Think America’s Two Biggest And Shittiest Cable Giants (Comcast, Charter) Could Merge Under Trump 2.0
from the merge-ALL-the-things! dept
Despite a lot of bullshit about how Trump is super “populist,” “supports antitrust reform,” and will “carry on the legacy of monopoly busters like Lina Khan,” none of that has ever been true. Trump’s first administration was jam packed with the rubber stamping of plenty of terrible mergers. Streaming, media, and telecom companies are very excited about what Trump 2.0 has in store.
Fail upward media brunchlords like David Zaslav are extremely excited about the potential for more terrible mergers (like the Time Warner Discovery disaster) in the streaming space. CBS is already busy kissing Trump’s ass in exchange for what it hopes will be Trump approval of its Skydance merger.
And analysts in telecom land are licking their chops at the idea of all manner of senseless consolidation in broadband land, including a merger between two of the most hated companies in America: Comcast (Xfinity) and Charter (Spectrum):
“We believe a Comcast/Charter merger could make industrial logical sense given the scale and subsequent massive synergies,” wrote the financial analysts at TD Cowen.”
“It is an obvious transaction,” said analyst Walter Piecyk with LightShed Partners in a video posted on social media.”
These guys aren’t really interested in whether the union creates a better company, or a better product, or happier consumers, or a stronger overall market. They’re interested in watching stock valuations (temporarily) go up. The last Trump administration was quick to rubber stamp the T-Mobile and Sprint merger, which immediately caused most U.S. wireless price competition to grind to a halt.
Comcast and Charter (usually) don’t directly compete. But as any academic that studies corporate power (especially telecom corporate power) will tell you, that doesn’t really matter.
The consolidation still strengthens the power of the underlying monopoly, and that scale always (especially in the broken, uncompetitive telecom market) routinely results in a company that’s increasingly hostile to remaining competitors, labor, and healthy supply chains. And increasingly influential in DC circles, where they lobby relentlessly to ensure competitive alternatives can’t take root.
It’s not really subtle or debatable, you can look directly at the history of the highly consolidated U.S. telecom market (coddled by decades of corruption and regulatory capture) to see precisely what this looks like in practice. Comcast and Charter are genuinely terrible, uninnovative companies because they’ve crushed all remaining competitors and largely defanged competent government oversight.
The deregulation, undermining of antitrust enforcement, and broad defanging of oversight is always framed by telecom monopolies (and their vast assorted consultants, think tanks, and mouthpieces) as the path toward true “free marketing competition” and “innovation.” But as Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and Charter routinely make clear, that promised future simply never arrives.
I enjoy reading trade magazine and business press coverage of this sort of thing, because it’s amusing how consumer welfare, market health, the public interest, labor rights, or even basic historical context, simply don’t exist. All the well documented and potential harms of mindless telecom consolidation are simply not mentioned. At all. Despite being rather integral to both the story and public understanding.
In its place, generally, is the most superficial of rhetoric about “synergies” and “innovation” that aren’t based on much of anything beyond vibes.
I suspect the Trump administration could approve a merger between Comcast and Charter. More immediately they’ll approve the already-proposed merger between the equally terrible Frontier and Verizon. And they’ll most certainly approve more terrible streaming mergers, resulting in higher prices, layoffs, and lower quality services. Assuming these companies adequately kiss the ring.
The press will unquestioningly parrot the mythological benefits of mindless consolidation and deregulation. And when the consolidative telecom market harms manifest, as they always do, everybody involved will simply pretend they had nothing to do with it as they stumble onward to the next big, pointless, stock-fluffing deal.
Filed Under: broadband, consolidation, consumer, fcc, high speed internet, mergers, telecom, trump
Companies: charter, comcast


Comments on “Analysts Think America’s Two Biggest And Shittiest Cable Giants (Comcast, Charter) Could Merge Under Trump 2.0”
Combining together to create a whole new level of shit: U L T R A S H I T
Some analysts wouldn’t happy until there is only 2 telcos.
Think Coca-Cola vs Pepsi Co, McDonald’s vs Burger King, Intel vs AMD…
The competition Heaven is when nobody have more than 2 choices (often equally bad).
Re:
Wendy’s and Dairy Queen would like a word with you!
Re: Re:
So would Nando’s, which serves much nicer chicken burgers than Mickey D’s.
Re:
I think Coke could buy McDonald’s, then Pepsi could buy Burger King, and then the analysts can start salivating over a merger… maybe Apple can buy them both, plus ARM and Intel and Netflix and a wireless telco. It always end up looking like that in the science-fictional universes Trump is imitating. (Although, if it’s the Snow Crash universe, the U.S.A. ends up being a minor power compared to the Franchise-Organized Quasi-National Entities.)
What’s next, kill section 230 so the only options are Meta or Google?
Hmm, ironically no actually. 230 is kinda their main pressuring tool to get tech companies to comply right now.
Re:
“What’s next, kill section 230 so the only options are Meta or Google?
Hmm, ironically no actually. 230 is kinda their main pressuring tool to get tech companies to comply right now.” please stop for gods sake
Re: Re:
No YOU shut up, or stop telling me to.
Re:
stop with the spamming of 230 on every article
They're not even pretending anymore...
If Comcast and Charter were to merge, the combined company would actually be a monopoly. We have Spectrum (Charter) in my city, and the neighboring city has Comcast. They can pretend to be “not a monopoly” because technically, they’re two competing companies (even though the neighboring city can’t get Spectrum and my town can’t get Comcast). But after this merger? Insert the Toy Story meme of Buzz Lightyear saying, “Monopolies, monopolies everywhere!”
Nope, competition is the way to go. We need more competition not less. When Comcrap tried to jack up my rates, I threatened to switch to T-Mobile 5G and they brought it back down and slunk away with their tail between their legs.
The kicker is: I can’t get T-Mobile at my house but they don’t know that. In a well functioning system, I wouldn’t need to play such silly games. It’s fun to see them slink away but also a waste of my time.
Re:
Yes, but Comcast and Charter aren’t really competitors. I mean, how many people have the ability to switch from one to the other? So I say allow the merger, on the condition they transition from a retail ISP to an open-access network operator only. Under regulated terms, of course, such that any small ISP startup will be able to realistically buy access—like the old dial-up days, and early DSL.
They should also be made to separate their video production, video licensing, and video streaming businesses. (I consider cable TV obsolete, so they can do what they want with that.)
We need competition where it actually matters. Not just two or three monopolies.