Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively & Ryan Reynolds, Streisanding All Of This Into A Mega-Story
from the here-we-go dept
I suppose this was probably inevitable, but boy do I wonder if it’s smart. We were just talking about the celebrity drama du jour between Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and Justin Baldoni. The very short version of this is that Lively and Baldoni starred in a movie together, Lively sued Baldoni and made a series of accusations about gross behavior Baldoni allegedly participated in, including a scheme in which Baldoni and associates were going to try to “ruin” Lively for making those accusations, whereas Baldoni denies all of it and instead accuses Lively and Reynolds of a coordinated scheme to take over the movie they were in and to ruin Baldoni’s career. Mixed in there as well is a lawsuit Baldoni filed against the New York Times for reporting on the accusations and a litigation hold letter Baldoni sent to Marvel and Disney in order to preserve any evidence about the character Nicepool in the latest Deadpool movie, because of the speculation that the character is made in such a way so as to make fun of, or defame as Baldoni will likely claim, Baldoni.
Again, that’s the short version. What you may have noticed is missing in all of that is a countersuit against Lively by Baldoni. We even called this out in our previous post, noting that attacking the coverage but not the accuser was “telling.”
Well, it’s telling no more, as Baldoni has in fact countersued both Lively and Reynolds.
The 179-page complaint — in which Baldoni is seeking $400 million and demanding a jury trial — was filed in the Southern District of New York on behalf of Baldoni, his company Wayfarer Studios, as well as his producing partner, Jamey Heath, his crisis manager, Melissa Nathan, his publicist Jennifer Abel and the It Ends With Us LLC. The defendants are accused of civil extortion, defamation and invasion of privacy.
“Lively stole Wayfarer’s movie, hijacked Wayfarer’s premiere, destroyed Plaintiffs’ personal and professional reputations and livelihood, and aimed to drive Plaintiffs out of business entirely,” the lawsuit states.
The suit of course states a whole lot more than that. The whole thing is below if you want to read it. It’s every bit as catty and gossipy as you’d expect out of this sort of thing, with accusations of doctoring text messages, claims that Reynolds and Lively attempted to coerce Baldoni and the studio to take the blame for the bad press Lively was getting, and so on. Again, for the purposes of our reporting on all of this, the veracity or not of anyone’s claims is not the point.
But it does play a role in our analysis of all of this. On the one hand, if Baldoni’s claims are true and he really is the victim of an organized campaign headed by Lively and Reynolds, well, then a countersuit probably makes all the sense in the world. One of the reasons the initial context of him not suing Lively was supposedly telling is that you typically get people threatening to sue but failing to do so because they are absolutely terrified about the discovery phase of the trial. That’s when all the dirt comes out and eventually gets made public. But if you’re not afraid of discovery because the facts are all on your side, then a countersuit makes sense.
But, man, if that isn’t the case, then we’re going to have to come up with an altered term for the kind of Streisand Effect that this will be. A public trial of this kind, between these levels of celebrities, is going to be like the Depp/Heard fiasco all over again. Everyone is probably going to come out looking real, real shitty. And, again, whatever minor anonymity Baldoni may have had previously is just gone. He and the accusations against him are in the spotlight now. He potentially could have settled all of this out of court and made it go away somewhat quietly. Not any more.
And from the initial responses to the lawsuit, it appears Lively intends for this to indeed be a fight.
Lively’s legal team told CNN in a statement Thursday that Baldoni’s suit “is another chapter in the abuser playbook. This is an age-old story: A woman speaks up with concrete evidence of sexual harassment and retaliation and the abuser attempts to turn the tables on the victim.”
“They are trying to shift the narrative to Ms. Lively by falsely claiming that she seized creative control and alienated the cast from Mr. Baldoni. The evidence will show that the cast and others had their own negative experiences with Mr. Baldoni and Wayfarer. The evidence will also show that Sony asked Ms. Lively to oversee Sony’s cut of the film, which they then selected for distribution and was a resounding success,” the statement also said.
So buckle up, because this is likely to be one hell of a ride. In no small part, I contend, because Baldoni’s actions have skyrocketed the press interest in all of this.
Filed Under: blake lively, defamation, extortion, justin baldoni, ryan reynolds, smear campaigns


Comments on “Justin Baldoni Sues Blake Lively & Ryan Reynolds, Streisanding All Of This Into A Mega-Story”
I wonder if this was intentional?
🤔
Re:
Of course, i’m probably wrong.
Re: Female narcissists are living nightmares
Female NPD’s are any humans worst nightmare.Lively is most certainly that.
This will be another female path narc publicity fame whore case, but not as messy as that last one Amber Turd.
Lively’s suit will die, Baldoni’s suit will prevail.
His attorney is upbeat: “Bryan Freedman, told Page Six in a statement that the lawsuit includes an “overwhelming amount of untampered evidence,” calling the legal back-and-forth “a battle [Lively] will not win and certainly will regret.”
Re: Re:
My guess is, it goes down something like this:
Lively has evidence to back up her initial claims against Boldoni.
Boldoni has evidence to back up his claims that Lively leveraged Boldoni’s behavior to take over the production.
So they’re both technically correct, and neither will come out of this looking good (but hey, they’ll be famous for a short while….)
The mindsets behind this are:
Boldoni: My behavior is no excuse to turn everyone against me and steal my production for personal gain.
Lively: It should be obvious that your behavior resulted in everyone, including me, turning against you and finishing production without you.
This lawsuit won’t change the perspective of either camp.
Re: Re:
Of course his lawyer says that. Why would he not? You think they’re going to put a lawsuit like this out there and NOT claim it’s open and shut and a given that he’ll win.
Fun fact though. It’s not a given. If it was that obvious, that would have been his first lawsuit, not his second.
I’m gonna have to sit this one out. Definitely biased in favor of Ryan Reynolds.
Good for Baldoni. Hope he prevails.
Re:
I’m split.
Re:
A sexual harassment sympathizer says what?
I want Lively to win.
I want to see the evidence and decide based on that.
So far the bald one appears to be the dickhead but we’ll get to hear loads more now.
Well done to the pricks who think it’s some kind of gender war!
Re:
Yeah, good luck about that evidence.
They’re gonna raise so much smoke, but almost no fire. By the end of it, you’re not gonna be able to see shit.
Queue the popcorn
Odds are Ms. Lively will come out the winner, Mr. Reyndolds (whom if you join Mint Mobile leaves you a voicemail message!) will be found entirely unrelated, and Mr. Baldani’s legal team will settle before it’s EVER hear in court.
This isn’t just Streisanding. Baldani is trying to take Ms. Lively down hard… and that’s beyond sick and disgusting.
Re:
FAFO.
It’s commendable to stand-up for oneself against vicious bullying and hit back twice as hard.
Re: Re:
Which is why Lively and the other victims deserve a big anti-SLAPP payout paid by Baldoni the Bully.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
Lively is an abuser and an anti-Semite who must be held accountable for her crimes.
Re: Re: Re:2
What the ever loving fuck are you blathering about?
Re:
Right. “Good Men” shouldn’t fight back against female sociopaths, it makes women look like WHAT THEY ARE
MAKE BILLIONAIRES EXTINCT!
Baldoni is backed by his billionaire buddy, thinking they’re invincible. Take them both down, Blake and Ryan!
“And from the initial responses to the lawsuit, it appears Lively intends for this to indeed be a fight.”
Tremendously missed opportunity to write that Lively is about to make things lively.
Re:
Puns on her name have been ruled politically incorrect since Lively was chosen to play Deadpool.
I find it very doubtful that Justin is really that stupid.
I don’t know how you could be alive at this point in this country and not know about discovery and the way his lawyer is selling this he’s saying he wants every text message, everything all out in front of the public and in the open which means they’re not afraid of the dirt becoming public. The way Justin’s Lawyer is talking about it even if he loses his case in court he’ll end up winning the PR war because it will end up obliterating Lively’s already damaged credibility. Why should we believe her? You and I have not seen any evidence of what she’s saying, we have her word. but that isn’t actually worth much given that she’s clearly misrepresented facts like the whole fat shaming accusation. Baldoni has back trouble, this was documented well before he even had acquired the rights to it ends with us, before a single person was hired for filming. So the accusation was baseless and groundless. We have her inviting him into the changing room as a text message, but even if somehow he kept doing it when he was only invited in once, Well there were so many cameras out there, is there any video tapes of it? Any text messages traded about it? if not. from the legal systems point of view it didn’t happen. Hearsay.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Great observations.
Re: Re:
At least you waited an hour and change to reply to yourself.
Re: Re: Re:
There’s only one poster on Techdirt. The whole site is just me replying to myself.
Re:
Imagine white nighting for a bro.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: flagged for abuse.
I’m going to circumvent any policies I haven’t read b
https://vocaroo.com/14KH5HzZcuZs
Re: Re: Re:
I don’t even know what the fuck you’re trying do and/or say here.
Re: Re: Re:2
They’re doubling down on being delusional.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3 the only dellusional ones here are the ones implying
I should take people trash talking me this way lying down. Projection much?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Fuck you and the horse you rode in on,.
https://voca.ro/1j1XGBaDzvSK
Re: Re: Re:3
Ain’t nobody clicking that link, bruh.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2 Tolerance of that shithead is vice.
intolerance is virtue.
Re: Re: Re:3
So is being a moron, apparently. What the hell are you going on about and what standing do you have to play a victim?
Re: Re: Re:4 because we are in fact victims.
it’s those who disagre who are the delusional ones. I’m sorry but that’s a solid fact. Literally no one should have to be harassed this way online.
Re:
TIL that you could do gig work for a PR firm.
Re:
He will cream her. His lawyer is chopping the bit to expose Lively as the toxic bully that she is
Re: Re:
Champing. Champing at the bit. Learn how phrases work.
Who?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Please put techdirt on for please!
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
On tor I meant
who cares?
why does it matter who? No one should be able to get away with making groundless accusations and extorting their way around this way.
Still fuzzy on the legal theory here
I still don’t get how “this character is such an asshole it must be me” is supposed to work as the basis for a defamation suit.
Re: Well if you say so...
It does make for one hell of an own-goal if nothing else.
‘Look at all the horrible character traits and actions they gave this character, it can’t be an amalgamation of a group of terrible people it must be a reference to me specifically!’
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I know this might come as a shock but
I hate people. So you know “imagine white knighting for a bro” Imagine supporting the right of people who hurl that kind of abuse at me to exist.
Re:
You’re not supporting a damned thing, leg humper.
And fucking what at the rest of your nonsense.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: As stated.
Fuck off. Completely. The world is a better place without you in in MAmba.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re: We should outlaw the very existence of mamba.
and then sacrifice him to norse gods. Good riddance. P.s. to the mods if you rules expect me to be nice to people who harass and abuse me this way, then you should examine them and update them so it’s open season on users who flame and no rules apply,
Re: Re: Re:2
Woo boy. You must be new here. Good luck with that.
Re: Re: Re:2
Nobody. Cares.
Re: Re: Re:2
STFU
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Kythra, this comment board has the most biased, rigged, fake “like” system online, and the mods will actively seek your IP and IP ban you for realz
Re: Re: Re:
If that were true, then why are you submitting a lot of evidence proving you’re projecting?
Re:
Hey Justin,
Not a good idea to comment on litigation you’ve instigated.
Even anonymously.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Awww, Kawaii desu.
They call me delusional and yet there’s this.
“”
Hey Justin,
Not a good idea to comment on litigation you’ve instigated.
Even anonymously.
”
I rest my case. Projection.
Re: Re: Re:
I rest my case delusion.
Re:
Holy fuck, stop crying. No one cares. You white knighted for a bro and you did so voluntarily. That was your choice. Whine less (a Lot less), and just own your shit. No one rinse should be obligated to back you up for you to back yourself up.
Re: Re: This is why internet culture is toxic.
Literally I know I’m not the only one to have to face the wrath of assholes on the internet and cyber harassment but literally no one should have to put up with this crap. own up? how bout you stop projecting onto me and own up to being a bully. full stop all I did was stand up for justice while you sat there keyboard warrioring me with insults like the cowards you are. the internet and it’s culture of assholery and men who seem to think being a gigantic DICK To everyone on the other side of the screen makes them a “REAL MAN.” needs to burn in hell and die in a fire. literally this is you:
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/greater-internet-fuckwad-theory
and if Standing up for Baldoni is white knighting then literally everyone and their mother and child should be a white knight. if you aren’t one of us you’re NOTHING more than a PROBLEM to be STAMPED OUT OF EXISTENCE with extreme prejudice. Fuck off.
I stand by what I wrote and if you have a problem with it I suggest you Go fuck yourself and the horse you road in on. I’m not ashamed of anything.
like I said all I’m guilty of is standing up for justice. the man was falsely accused.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
P.s I'm white knighting for a man? LOL
she’s not gonna fuck you bro so why you riding her dick?
Re:
Speaking of projection bro…
Re:
I’ve said 0 things in defense of Lively.
"Everyone is probably going to come out looking real, real shitty"
It appears that many techdirt readers have decided to get a head-start on that by flinging whiny little comments at each other over yet another pathetic celebrity shitfight, because basic bitches just can’t help but choose sides before being in full possession of all (or any) facts.
Shoutout to the two commenters who acknowledged that it’s all just accusations and hearsay at this point because neither party has presented a shred of evidence to back up their claims.
The rest should take a hard look at themselves because that was a pretty sad little display.
telling me I'm not a victim = Gas lighting.
I know what was said about me. Hey! at least if online harassment is my complaint I’m in great company!
but I must remmeber that my suffering Need not be unique or special to be valid lest I commit the fallacy of relative privation. oh I absolutely am. The only psychosis AKA deusion at play here is they idea that I’m not. Someone online talked shit about me, ergo Online harassment ergo I’ve been made a victim of online harassment for doing literally nothing that warranted it or wrong.
Not the best look
I don’t know who’s in the wrong, but Baldoni is not doing himself any favors. I hope both parties each get a corgi and get an renewed outlook on the world.
How on earth did this account and post make it past the filter?
New user.