Substackerati’s ‘Grave Concerns’ About White House/Big Tech Collusion Have Disappeared With Elon’s Ascension

from the (sub)stack-of-hypocrites dept

For years, a vocal group of self-described “contrarian” Substackified pundits warned about a supposed “censorship industrial complex” involving collusion between the White House and social media companies to set content moderation policies. There was just one problem: it wasn’t even close to true.

Now, with Elon Musk owning ExTwitter and Donald Trump heading back to the White House, we have a situation that actually matches what those contrarian chroniclers claimed to fear: powerful tech moguls with direct ties to the administration in a position to influence online speech. Suddenly, the grave concerns about “creeping authoritarianism” have evaporated. The double standard couldn’t be more blatant.

So, I figured it was worth calling out the hypocrisy, and MSNBC kindly gave me the space to do so:

The so-called Twitter Files, hyped by Elon Musk and handpicked journalists, were touted as smoking-gun proof of a vast conspiracy between social media and the government to violate the First Amendment. Testifying before Congress, these reporters called it a “grave threat” and evidence of “creeping authoritarianism.”

Flash forward to today. Donald Trump is heading back to the White House. And Musk, owner of the social media company X (formerly Twitter), is a top donor, surrogate and soon-to-be government “efficiency” overseer. Musk has openly used his platform to boost Trump, attack his opponents and shape the political narrative. The collusion between government and Big Tech is no longer a conspiracy theory — it’s out in the open.

Yet suddenly, all those grave concerns about the threat to democracy have evaporated. Most of the same voices who warned of shocking government overreach in the pre-Musk Twitter era are either silent about this turn of events or they’re in wild celebration of the Trump-Musk alliance. This reveals the issue wasn’t a matter of principle; it was a matter of party.

The limited space in the MSNBC piece prevented me from delving into the additional hypocrisy around how swiftly Elon Musk banned a reporter and links related to the leaked JD Vance dossier. This action was an even more extreme version of what GOP pundits have baselessly claimed Twitter did with the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story.

Yet, even as the completely exaggerated claims about what happened with Twitter and the Hunter laptop are still regularly brought up by the MAGA faithful, the story about Elon and the Vance dossier disappeared after, what, two days?

But, really, the piece takes aim at the Elon/Trump enablers. The Sophist Substackerati who position themselves as brave truth tellers, standing up to government overreach: the Matt Taibbis, Michael Shellenbergers, and Bari Weisses of the world, who all seem to have forgotten what they were saying not too long ago about the hallucinated story of coziness between the White House and social media.

Taibbi called it “a grave threat to people of all political persuasions.” Shellenberger called it “the shocking and disturbing emergence of State-sponsored censorship.” A reporter from The Free Press — a publication created by Bari Weiss (another Twitter Files reporter) — Rupa Subramanya, testified in one of these hearings warning that the American government was heading down a dangerous path of censorship, calling government connections to social media “creeping authoritarianism.”

But, oh, how things have changed.

Elon Musk still owns X. Donald Trump still owns Truth Social. These are two social media networks that can drive the news and conversations about important events in the world.

Unlike before, when there was conjecture (without evidence) of grand conspiracies and connections between the White House and important social media companies, now it’s completely explicit and out in the open.

Yet, all talk of the “grave threats” and “shocking and disturbing” connections between the White House and social media have disappeared entirely. Shellenberger has called the new administration “cathartic.” Taibbi has posted numerous articles celebrating the results of the election. The Free Press has a bunch of articles praising the new Trump administration and celebrating how the election was “a win for a new generation of builders like Elon Musk.”

The “Twitter Files” pundits built their brands on a false narrative of anti-establishment rebellion against the “elite” trying to control social media. But when faced with the real thing, they’re too busy high-fiving each other to care. Their “grave concerns” about government collusion with Big Tech have suddenly evaporated now that the administration and the tech mogul are their ideological allies.

Or, as I note:

Turns out for the “Twitter Files” crew, “creeping authoritarianism” isn’t so creepy when it’s your team doing the creeping.

There’s a lot more in the piece, but I want to point out why it’s so important to call out this hypocrisy. I know that there are a bunch of cynical “too savvy for school” folks who always respond to things like this by saying “what, it surprises you that they were full of shit?”

No, it doesn’t surprise me at all. I’ve been calling out this kind of nonsense for years. But people who don’t follow this stuff closely don’t know this. There are so many times where I hear something these nonsense peddlers pushed over and over again pop up in the mainstream media or among random people who just assume what they’re saying is accurate.

Calling out the hypocrisy isn’t to impact those in the Intellectual Derp Web. They have their captured audiences and have made it clear they don’t give a shit. But it’s important to remind everyone else what the grift is here. The cluelessness, the gaslighting, and the utter nonsense they spent years spreading for clout. Some of us recognize it for what it was.

We need to keep telling people and reminding people so that everyone else knows it’s bullshit too.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,
Companies: truth social, twitter, x

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Substackerati’s ‘Grave Concerns’ About White House/Big Tech Collusion Have Disappeared With Elon’s Ascension”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
56 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Let’s see here…

  • “This is more anti-Musk hate speech!”
  • “You’re just mad because it’s not your side getting to do this!”
  • “You’re overblowing things.”
  • “Go cry about it, f⸺t.”

Does that about cover all the potential troll comments, or am I missing something?

(Also: Fuck Elon Musk.)

terribly tired (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

It helps if you see them as the unthinking attack dogs they’ve let themselves become. Or decided to become, now the US is openly aiming to become a Jesus humper fascist state. You’re watching them operate at their absolute limit, here.

There’s so little thinking going on they could be replaced by pure software if not for your average fascist regime’s need for physical attack dogs to fill out the brown shirts and the black boots.

terribly tired (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

That’s the very reason I only ever attach “humper” to halfwits of that sort. Actual believers I have no problems with, for the simple reason actual believers don’t tend to conclude Christo-fascism is a viable answer to anything at all.

In a previous life I ended up speaking to clergy from several faiths on the regular in the course of doing my job, and not fucking once did any one of them try to force a deity or arbitrary set of morals of any description down my throat. Consequently, I very much enjoyed those conversations.

It’s absolutely amazing, as a non-believer, to have the opportunity to speak to clergy with no strings attached. Becoming a representative of an entire faith is, as it turns out, quite involved, by the subject’s very nature. I have no love for their faiths, but I have endless love for anyone of faith who doesn’t judge me by, or for, my lack thereof.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3

No, not for a second. There are rabid bigots and transphobes on here all the time, but this person is only going after regulars who aren’t for the lightest of gray areas and they’re obsessive about bringing it up on other articles like a troll just trying to harass people. They’re also not using the terminology as if they understand what it means. They sound very much like a right winger pretending to be a leftist who thinks you can just sprinkle in the words without understanding the context. We’ve seen a lot of those around here.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

How about “It’s not a First Amendment violation if Musk is doing what Musk wants to do”? Remember that the main complaint before was that the government was coercing the sites to go along with them, with threats of things like antitrust actions. Musk doesn’t need to be coerced. Granted, even if it’s not a First Amendment violation, it can still be concerning if people with ties to government can shut down speech. But…

There’s also “This is different because there are viable alternatives”. Truth Social doesn’t have enough reach beyond people who support Trump anyway to matter. Twitter might, but at least people can still use Facebook, YouTube, etc. Or BlueSky or Mastodon if you insist on a Twitter-like one. The problem really came in when all the major social media sites were in on it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Sorry, only a select few people are buying this narrative now. Others have started to see the lies from the left. That’s why their ratings are terrible. Even Zuckerberg has admitted to caving to pressure from the Whitehouse. You want it to be not true so bad but you can’t change the facts

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

I hope you feel the same way when it’s your team doing the censoring you’re accusing “the left” of carrying out.

By the way, what does the research say about which political party/leaning gets more special attention (e.g., more “passes” on suspensions/bans for content that would otherwise get someone suspended/banned) from the major social media services?

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Everyone is a liar, it is simply a matter of degrees.

The maga/trump folk indulge in a form of lying that has become known as projection, some are so far gone they do not even realize they re doing it.

The democrat lies are more like ‘we are sure we can accomplish this with the help of republicans’.

These are all lies, they just differ in significant ways.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Sorry, only a select few people are buying this narrative now. Others have started to see the lies from the left. That’s why their ratings are terrible. Even Zuckerberg has admitted to caving to pressure from the Whitehouse. You want it to be not true so bad but you can’t change the facts

Even assuming this were true (which it is not) it does not even try to address the question of why you’re not more concerned about Musk/Trump and their social media properties and the connections to the incoming admin.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Zuck didn’t admit to caving. He was accused of caving when FB never did anything of the sort, then caved on that accusation to get into Trump’s good graces if the worst case scenario were to happen, which it did.

Zuck has been weasely as fuck, but there never actually was “collusion” there. FB fade it’s own moderation decisions. Some of them just aligned with what was requested.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

terribly tired (profile) says:

That’s the very reason I only ever attach “humper” to halfwits of that sort. Actual believers I have no problems with, for the simple reason actual believers don’t tend to conclude Christo-fascism is a viable answer to anything at all.

In a previous life I ended up speaking to clergy from several faiths on the regular in the course of doing my job, and not fucking once did any one of them try to force a deity or arbitrary set of morals of any description down my throat. Consequently, I very much enjoyed those conversations.

It’s absolutely amazing, as a non-believer, to have the opportunity to speak to clergy with no strings attached. Becoming a representative of an entire faith is, as it turns out, quite involved, by the subject’s very nature. I have no love for their faiths, but I have endless love for anyone of faith who doesn’t judge me by, or for, my lack thereof.

Anonymous Coward says:

And don’t forget the false equivalency all the nutjobs are drawing between democrats “crimes” and the gqp’s crimes.

Hillary emails and Hunters laptop are 100% nothing burgers. There are no Hillary backed satanic blood cult pizza parties. Hunter dick had nothing to do with the act of presidenting.

Wheras : Ivanka and Jared got an absurd amount of money to “invest” from prince bonesaw right after you left office with hundreds of classified documents, among them were some that were nuclear related.

Where the f was main justice on that one.. oh right, the packed court.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Yes, I Know I'm Commenting Anonymously says:

Hart -> Mouth

There is a saying in Dutch:

Daar waar het hart vol van is, loopt de mond van over,

meaning that which is in your hart, the mouth runs with. i.e. the thing that occupies your being, in this case `owning the libs through control of social media’, is what you talk about. So, when the other party is in power, you accuse them of what you want to do yourself.

Mix that with US politics being more faith-based than reason-based, and this is a very logical situation (note: I do not agree with the situation but I understand what’s happening).

nasch (profile) says:

Re:

meaning that which is in your hart, the mouth runs with.

I assume you’re not a native English speaker so I hope you take this as a helpful pointer and not an insult as so many tend to. A hart is an animal and the heart is the organ that pumps blood. They’re pronounced the same, and no, English doesn’t make any sense.

Also, good saying, I like it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Leave a Reply to nasch Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt needs your support! Get the first Techdirt Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...