Substackerati’s ‘Grave Concerns’ About White House/Big Tech Collusion Have Disappeared With Elon’s Ascension
from the (sub)stack-of-hypocrites dept
For years, a vocal group of self-described “contrarian” Substackified pundits warned about a supposed “censorship industrial complex” involving collusion between the White House and social media companies to set content moderation policies. There was just one problem: it wasn’t even close to true.
Now, with Elon Musk owning ExTwitter and Donald Trump heading back to the White House, we have a situation that actually matches what those contrarian chroniclers claimed to fear: powerful tech moguls with direct ties to the administration in a position to influence online speech. Suddenly, the grave concerns about “creeping authoritarianism” have evaporated. The double standard couldn’t be more blatant.
So, I figured it was worth calling out the hypocrisy, and MSNBC kindly gave me the space to do so:
The so-called Twitter Files, hyped by Elon Musk and handpicked journalists, were touted as smoking-gun proof of a vast conspiracy between social media and the government to violate the First Amendment. Testifying before Congress, these reporters called it a “grave threat” and evidence of “creeping authoritarianism.”
Flash forward to today. Donald Trump is heading back to the White House. And Musk, owner of the social media company X (formerly Twitter), is a top donor, surrogate and soon-to-be government “efficiency” overseer. Musk has openly used his platform to boost Trump, attack his opponents and shape the political narrative. The collusion between government and Big Tech is no longer a conspiracy theory — it’s out in the open.
Yet suddenly, all those grave concerns about the threat to democracy have evaporated. Most of the same voices who warned of shocking government overreach in the pre-Musk Twitter era are either silent about this turn of events or they’re in wild celebration of the Trump-Musk alliance. This reveals the issue wasn’t a matter of principle; it was a matter of party.
The limited space in the MSNBC piece prevented me from delving into the additional hypocrisy around how swiftly Elon Musk banned a reporter and links related to the leaked JD Vance dossier. This action was an even more extreme version of what GOP pundits have baselessly claimed Twitter did with the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story.
Yet, even as the completely exaggerated claims about what happened with Twitter and the Hunter laptop are still regularly brought up by the MAGA faithful, the story about Elon and the Vance dossier disappeared after, what, two days?
But, really, the piece takes aim at the Elon/Trump enablers. The Sophist Substackerati who position themselves as brave truth tellers, standing up to government overreach: the Matt Taibbis, Michael Shellenbergers, and Bari Weisses of the world, who all seem to have forgotten what they were saying not too long ago about the hallucinated story of coziness between the White House and social media.
Taibbi called it “a grave threat to people of all political persuasions.” Shellenberger called it “the shocking and disturbing emergence of State-sponsored censorship.” A reporter from The Free Press — a publication created by Bari Weiss (another Twitter Files reporter) — Rupa Subramanya, testified in one of these hearings warning that the American government was heading down a dangerous path of censorship, calling government connections to social media “creeping authoritarianism.”
But, oh, how things have changed.
Elon Musk still owns X. Donald Trump still owns Truth Social. These are two social media networks that can drive the news and conversations about important events in the world.
Unlike before, when there was conjecture (without evidence) of grand conspiracies and connections between the White House and important social media companies, now it’s completely explicit and out in the open.
Yet, all talk of the “grave threats” and “shocking and disturbing” connections between the White House and social media have disappeared entirely. Shellenberger has called the new administration “cathartic.” Taibbi has posted numerous articles celebrating the results of the election. The Free Press has a bunch of articles praising the new Trump administration and celebrating how the election was “a win for a new generation of builders like Elon Musk.”
The “Twitter Files” pundits built their brands on a false narrative of anti-establishment rebellion against the “elite” trying to control social media. But when faced with the real thing, they’re too busy high-fiving each other to care. Their “grave concerns” about government collusion with Big Tech have suddenly evaporated now that the administration and the tech mogul are their ideological allies.
Or, as I note:
Turns out for the “Twitter Files” crew, “creeping authoritarianism” isn’t so creepy when it’s your team doing the creeping.
There’s a lot more in the piece, but I want to point out why it’s so important to call out this hypocrisy. I know that there are a bunch of cynical “too savvy for school” folks who always respond to things like this by saying “what, it surprises you that they were full of shit?”
No, it doesn’t surprise me at all. I’ve been calling out this kind of nonsense for years. But people who don’t follow this stuff closely don’t know this. There are so many times where I hear something these nonsense peddlers pushed over and over again pop up in the mainstream media or among random people who just assume what they’re saying is accurate.
Calling out the hypocrisy isn’t to impact those in the Intellectual Derp Web. They have their captured audiences and have made it clear they don’t give a shit. But it’s important to remind everyone else what the grift is here. The cluelessness, the gaslighting, and the utter nonsense they spent years spreading for clout. Some of us recognize it for what it was.
We need to keep telling people and reminding people so that everyone else knows it’s bullshit too.
Filed Under: bari weiss, censorship industrial complex, contrarians, donald trump, elon musk, hypocrisy, matt taibbi, michael shellenberger, nonsense peddlers
Companies: truth social, twitter, x




Comments on “Substackerati’s ‘Grave Concerns’ About White House/Big Tech Collusion Have Disappeared With Elon’s Ascension”
Let’s see here…
Does that about cover all the potential troll comments, or am I missing something?
(Also: Fuck Elon Musk.)
Re:
Think you got all of them, more or less.
Re: Re:
Less than a minute after I said this and they’re already coming out of the woodwork. Incredible.
Re: Re: Re:
It helps if you see them as the unthinking attack dogs they’ve let themselves become. Or decided to become, now the US is openly aiming to become a Jesus humper fascist state. You’re watching them operate at their absolute limit, here.
There’s so little thinking going on they could be replaced by pure software if not for your average fascist regime’s need for physical attack dogs to fill out the brown shirts and the black boots.
Re: Re: Re:2
I’m not sure if calling them Jesus humpers is fitting, as it seems to imply that they actually like or even care about Jesus rather than are just using him(and the rest of the book he’s from) as a bludgeon against those they don’t like and/or as a method to attain and keep power.
Re: Re: Re:3
That’s the very reason I only ever attach “humper” to halfwits of that sort. Actual believers I have no problems with, for the simple reason actual believers don’t tend to conclude Christo-fascism is a viable answer to anything at all.
In a previous life I ended up speaking to clergy from several faiths on the regular in the course of doing my job, and not fucking once did any one of them try to force a deity or arbitrary set of morals of any description down my throat. Consequently, I very much enjoyed those conversations.
It’s absolutely amazing, as a non-believer, to have the opportunity to speak to clergy with no strings attached. Becoming a representative of an entire faith is, as it turns out, quite involved, by the subject’s very nature. I have no love for their faiths, but I have endless love for anyone of faith who doesn’t judge me by, or for, my lack thereof.
Re: Re: Re:2
You underestimate the power of “Hold my beer and watch this!”
Re: Re: Re:3
Am I? Judging by the quality of the trolls we get frothing through here, I rather doubt it. I’ve still not seen a single one I’d trust to outsmart a used dishcloth.
Re:
you missed one:
“Frothing and rambling incoherently”
Re:
I think you forgot the obligatory bigoted attack on trans people. Or maybe it’ll be some racism this time.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
TBH, Stephen doesn’t care as much about trans people as he pretends.
Re: Re: Re:
Fuck off, cosplayer. You don’t care about trans people. You’re being transphobic by objectifying them and using them as a weapon against people you disagree with. It’s not working. We see through your bullshit.
Re: Re: Re:2
Did you ever consider that the person you’re responding to may be a trans person who’s seen flaws in Stephen’s ‘protection’ of their community? Didn’t think so.
Re: Re: Re:3
No, not for a second. There are rabid bigots and transphobes on here all the time, but this person is only going after regulars who aren’t for the lightest of gray areas and they’re obsessive about bringing it up on other articles like a troll just trying to harass people. They’re also not using the terminology as if they understand what it means. They sound very much like a right winger pretending to be a leftist who thinks you can just sprinkle in the words without understanding the context. We’ve seen a lot of those around here.
Re:
How about “It’s not a First Amendment violation if Musk is doing what Musk wants to do”? Remember that the main complaint before was that the government was coercing the sites to go along with them, with threats of things like antitrust actions. Musk doesn’t need to be coerced. Granted, even if it’s not a First Amendment violation, it can still be concerning if people with ties to government can shut down speech. But…
There’s also “This is different because there are viable alternatives”. Truth Social doesn’t have enough reach beyond people who support Trump anyway to matter. Twitter might, but at least people can still use Facebook, YouTube, etc. Or BlueSky or Mastodon if you insist on a Twitter-like one. The problem really came in when all the major social media sites were in on it.
Re:
That covers 90% of troll comments – all fully expected from MAGA trolls.
You only left out the “both sides do it” crap from those who are just concerned enough to post about their lack of concern.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Sorry, only a select few people are buying this narrative now. Others have started to see the lies from the left. That’s why their ratings are terrible. Even Zuckerberg has admitted to caving to pressure from the Whitehouse. You want it to be not true so bad but you can’t change the facts
Re:
I hope you feel the same way when it’s your team doing the censoring you’re accusing “the left” of carrying out.
By the way, what does the research say about which political party/leaning gets more special attention (e.g., more “passes” on suspensions/bans for content that would otherwise get someone suspended/banned) from the major social media services?
Re: Re:
That depends on where you’re getting your research
Re:
Everyone is a liar, it is simply a matter of degrees.
The maga/trump folk indulge in a form of lying that has become known as projection, some are so far gone they do not even realize they re doing it.
The democrat lies are more like ‘we are sure we can accomplish this with the help of republicans’.
These are all lies, they just differ in significant ways.
Re: Re:
“BUT MUH BOTH SIIIIDES!!!1one”.
Christ on a tittyfucking bike, you lot are so predictably dishcloth-witted I could set my damn watch after it.
Re: Re: Re:
When did I say any of that?
Talk about stereotypical reactions
Re: Re:
TBF, they could accomplish a lot given the help of Republicans. That’s not technically a lie. It’s just still not politically correct to acknowledge that the Republicans are nothing but regressive shit-throwers.
Re:
Even assuming this were true (which it is not) it does not even try to address the question of why you’re not more concerned about Musk/Trump and their social media properties and the connections to the incoming admin.
Re: Re:
That’s readily explained by partisanship.
Re:
Zuck didn’t admit to caving. He was accused of caving when FB never did anything of the sort, then caved on that accusation to get into Trump’s good graces if the worst case scenario were to happen, which it did.
Zuck has been weasely as fuck, but there never actually was “collusion” there. FB fade it’s own moderation decisions. Some of them just aligned with what was requested.
It’s a grave threat, unless it’s done by my team.
Re:
That’s why jihad envy is a thing. Lots of similar stuff.
'This is a grave threat to democracy and free speech(unless my side is doing it)!'
If you only object to something when your side isn’t doing it you don’t actually have a problem with it, just the thought that it might be used against you.
Well, you have to admit one thing:
The authoritarianism has stopped bothering with creeping.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I still can’t believe furries exist.
How is that a thing?
Re:
Some people enjoy watching men give each other chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
How is that a thing?
Oh, wait. It’s because our society normalizes toxic traits like aggression and violence and otherizing people who aren’t “on our side.”
Re:
“I still can’t believe furries exist.
How is that a thing?”
I think it all started with sporting team mascots.
Weird stuff.
It is humorous when the two opposing mascots have a mock fight and then do some push ups. I doubt they get paid much, neither do the cheerleaders.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
HAHAHAHA Shitlib provides content for #1 Failing Shitlib Network!!! NICE!
Re:
Can you please try making your trolling a little less…. boring?
Re:
…shit, I missed one.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Hi autist-who-supports-teachers-doing-violence-to-students!
Re: Re: Re:
Am I going to have to stop being an AC just to make sure people don’t think I’m you?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
I don’t give a fuck what you do, dork.
Re: Re: Re:3
Oh wait sorry no. I’m the dork.
So, now there will be more collusion, there will be less conspiracy theories.
In other words, less ignorance of the reality gives less conspiracy theories.
How not to hate logic when it’s always right?
That’s the very reason I only ever attach “humper” to halfwits of that sort. Actual believers I have no problems with, for the simple reason actual believers don’t tend to conclude Christo-fascism is a viable answer to anything at all.
In a previous life I ended up speaking to clergy from several faiths on the regular in the course of doing my job, and not fucking once did any one of them try to force a deity or arbitrary set of morals of any description down my throat. Consequently, I very much enjoyed those conversations.
It’s absolutely amazing, as a non-believer, to have the opportunity to speak to clergy with no strings attached. Becoming a representative of an entire faith is, as it turns out, quite involved, by the subject’s very nature. I have no love for their faiths, but I have endless love for anyone of faith who doesn’t judge me by, or for, my lack thereof.
And don’t forget the false equivalency all the nutjobs are drawing between democrats “crimes” and the gqp’s crimes.
Hillary emails and Hunters laptop are 100% nothing burgers. There are no Hillary backed satanic blood cult pizza parties. Hunter dick had nothing to do with the act of presidenting.
Wheras : Ivanka and Jared got an absurd amount of money to “invest” from prince bonesaw right after you left office with hundreds of classified documents, among them were some that were nuclear related.
Where the f was main justice on that one.. oh right, the packed court.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Hillary is a ghoul on whose orders many have been killed.
Re: Re:
Hey, Alex. I’m really sorry to hear about you losing all your shit because of your harassment of grieving families. You might be more comfortable on Truth Social than Techdirt.
Re: Re: Re:
I wouldn’t mind blocking him on Bluesky.
Re: Re:
I hate doing the “whatboutism” thing, but, uh…didn’t some 400,000 people die under the Trump administration thanks to Trump’s incompetence and willingness to lie?
Re: Re: Re:
Officially, sure. Excess deaths were way more than 400k though.
Hart -> Mouth
There is a saying in Dutch:
meaning that which is in your hart, the mouth runs with. i.e. the thing that occupies your being, in this case `owning the libs through control of social media’, is what you talk about. So, when the other party is in power, you accuse them of what you want to do yourself.
Mix that with US politics being more faith-based than reason-based, and this is a very logical situation (note: I do not agree with the situation but I understand what’s happening).
Re:
I assume you’re not a native English speaker so I hope you take this as a helpful pointer and not an insult as so many tend to. A hart is an animal and the heart is the organ that pumps blood. They’re pronounced the same, and no, English doesn’t make any sense.
Also, good saying, I like it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Td is always claiming the government hasn’t been in the business of censorship and they have to know that they’re spreading false information. There’s a million examples of it. Here’s one…https://docs.reclaimthenet.org/letter-to-social-media-companies-election-2024.pdf
Re:
I don’t see anything in that letter that amounts to a demand for censorship. Try again.
Re: Re:
False equivalents are the right’s only equivalents.
Re:
Maybe some day you’ll grow up to realize drug addicts are not credible sources.
Re:
FYI, saying that the government is barred from censorship under the First Amendment =/= saying that the government never attempts to engage in censorship.
Whattabout meeee?
Let’s not forget the rest of the oligarchs who aren’t attention whores like 45 and Elmo. They still have skin in this game, but are being quite a bit less noisy about it, like Peter Thiel.