Trump’s Likely FCC Boss, Brendan Carr, Tries To Undermine Popular Infrastructure Bill Broadband Improvements
from the useless-obstructionism dept
States are poised to receive $42.5 billion in broadband grants thanks to the 2021 infrastructure bill. While a lot of this money will be going to the usual entrenched monopoly incumbents, a lot of it is also going to a growing list of popular cooperatives, municipalities, and city-owned utilities to expand affordable fiber.
This Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program is going to help bring a lot of competition and new fiber into numerous markets. So, as per obstructionist party tradition, Republicans are trying to kill or undermine it at every possibility.
Republicans voted against the program, but then immediately turned around and took credit for the local improvements among their constituents. They worked tirelessly to try and keep this money from driving competition into Comcast and AT&T markets. They’ve also launched show hearings after learning that the BEAD program is (gasp) trying to make sure this new broadband is affordable to poor people.
Then there’s Trump FCC pick Brendan Carr. Carr, you’ll recall, spends all of his time whining about TikTok (a sector he doesn’t regulate), but none of it on helping telecom consumers (a sector he actually regulates). And when he can focus on telecom, it’s generally either to lobotomize corporate oversight, or do some favor for unpopular companies like Comcast and AT&T.
Like this new missive in the Wall Street Journal (paywall) that tries to claim the BEAD program is a “flop” because it has taken some time to implement it:
“Kamala Harris lamented recently that “in America, it takes too long and it costs too much to build.” She’s right. But she failed to mention that those costly delays are a feature, not a bug, of her progressive policies.”
What Carr doesn’t say is that a primary reason it has taken three years to get this component of the infrastructure bill off the ground was a direct result of Carr’s own incompetence. The Trump and Ajit Pai FCC (of which Carr was a key member) completely mismanaged the FCC’s $20.4 billion Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF), resulting in billions of dollars in fraud and various delays.
The Pai FCC’s mismanagement of RDOF was so severe, when it came time for the Biden administration to put an agency in charge of the BEAD program, it selected the NTIA instead of the FCC. That’s directly on Carr; but he just (whoops) doesn’t mention that bit.
Progress has been slow because the NTIA has been trying to do all of the stuff the FCC failed to do, like properly map broadband access to ensure the money is spent properly. And do a better job screening applicants to make sure they can actually deliver the broadband networks they promise.
The Carr and Pai FCC didn’t bother with this last bit, resulting in a long line of RDOF applicants (including Musk’s Starlink) getting billions of dollars they didn’t deserve, for projects they couldn’t build. That resulted in a ton of defaulting bidders, and it has taken years for the Biden FCC to clean up the Trump FCC’s mess. Worse, some of the communities stuck in default over RDOF bids now can’t qualify for BEAD funds, boxing them out of a generational broadband funding opportunity due to Trump FCC incompetence.
Starlink in particular was poised to receive nearly a billion dollars from Trump to deliver expensive, satellite access to a handful of airport parking lots and traffic medians. The Biden FCC (correctly) retracted that award, stating it wasn’t clear that the increasingly congested Starlink network could actually deliver consistently promised speeds. They also said Starlink access was expensive, instead redirecting these funds toward more “future proof” and affordable local fiber and wireless access. I’ve criticized the Biden FCC plenty; but on this particular point they were absolutely correct.
Still, Musk and Republicans have been throwing a noisy hissy fit ever since. Carr continues it in the pages of the Journal, falsely claiming the FCC engaged in “regulatory warfare” because it didn’t give a billionaire a billion dollars for slow, expensive broadband access:
“As I noted in my dissent at the time, the FCC’s revocation couldn’t be explained by any objective application of the facts, the law or sound policy. In my view, it amounted to nothing more than regulatory lawfare against one of the left’s top targets: Musk. Rural communities stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide are paying the price.”
That the GOP cares about the “digital divide” is a fiction. That the party cares about funding broadband access to rural communities is a fiction. That the party cares about government being efficient with taxpayer money is a fiction.
Republicans have fought against improving the quality and affordability of broadband access for the better part of thirty years, both by undermining regional competition, and by dismantling what’s left of corporate oversight and consumer protection. It routinely goes out of its way to protect entrenched monopolies like AT&T and Comcast from competition and accountability at every turn.
Carr’s goal is to paint the BEAD infrastructure bill program as a boondoggle, knowing full well money from the popular program will begin to flow to local constituents after the election season. As with all government programs BEAD certainly will have problems, but in this instance the NTIA is actually trying to do things right. That takes time.
BEAD will have a transformative impact on many rural, disconnected markets. I know this because part of my work involves talking to a different red or blue municipality every single week, which all tell me they’re poised for some amazing improvements. And Carr certainly doesn’t want locals understanding that Republicans have tried to dismantle a popular program that’s actually benefiting them.
Should Trump win the White House, you can be fairly certain Carr will be the next agency boss. He’s outlined what he’ll do in his Project 2025 chapter on how the FCC should be run, which largely involves repurposing the agency to harass, tax, and nanny tech companies that don’t kiss the authoritarian ring, and harass media companies that speak critically of King Trump.
You can be absolutely sure Carr will redirect as much BEAD money as possible to Elon Musk and monopolies like AT&T, and dismantle the most useful parts of BEAD (like the efforts to fund popular community-owned broadband networks). Carr is a Trump sycophant of the highest order, and if he’s put in charge of the nation’s biggest telecom and media regulator, the dysfunction won’t be subtle.
Filed Under: 5g, bead, brendan carr, broadband, fcc, fiber, infrastructure, ntia, starlink, states, telecom, wireless


Comments on “Trump’s Likely FCC Boss, Brendan Carr, Tries To Undermine Popular Infrastructure Bill Broadband Improvements”
FTFTWSJ. TW.
I was unaware of this impending doom with the cell phone service availability in airport parking lots and highway medians.
Had to take a stab at Musk even though his companies are outsiders and ambushed, tripped up, stonewalled, smeared, at every opportunity by the entrenched corporations and the sock puppet administration in all three houses.
I don’t like the guy personally but the people he hires do good work and get well deserved credit as opposed to that historical hero Edison and all who followed in his footsteps.
America loves assholes, grifters and shysters as long as they are rich and put on a good show.
Re:
Lmfao. Yeah, that poor rich Apartheid kid really just can’t catch a break.
Re:
“America loves assholes, grifters and shysters”
Yes we do, lol ….. and that is why you are allowed to post here.
/Duh
Re:
Have.. You used starlink? It’s shit. I was just testing it after some networking changes and it’s currently running at the same speed as my backup dsl
Re: Re:
You could be here in Australia: $600 (self install equipment and delivery charge) then $139.00 a month. The only bonus is that if you fall off the ladder or roof while putting up the receiver the healthcare is free.
Re:
So what? Elon is an approval-seeking asshole who turned his mid-life crisis into everyone else’s problem by spending $44bn to make himself a “cool kid” despite his massive amount of Divorced Energy. That he has a knack for hiring talented people (when he isn’t firing them in a fit of rage) doesn’t change that he’s an asshole.
Re:
He, or rather Starlink, doesn’t need a break, and certainly Starlink doesn’t need a subsidy for the “service areas” involved, and definitely not at the cost of a cool billion. For an overpriced service that was a bad idea from the get and already can’t deliver and cannot really expand.
Now if that money went to farmers and other underserved rural citizens who could choose Starlink if they wanted, more power to them.
By the time the next President will be in office, the national debt will be about $36T.
Since most optimistic projections allow to get up to $50T by 2030, that’s a lot of money in telcos presents for the next years.
And who gonna pay for the interests (because US will never be able to pay the debt), about $1T/year (and $4T/year in 2030)?
Neither Trump nor Musk, of course.
Re:
I’ve been hearing for 40 years that the US won’t be able to pay its debt soon. The people saying it are almost exclusively conservatives who, in addition to just being fucking wrong, run up the national debt like drunken sailors every chance they get.
Re:
Move taxes back to 1990s levels — one of the most productive periods in US history — and our debt problem magically evaporates.
Hell, move taxes back to 1950s levels — the period of the US’s greatest growth and that MAGAts claim to want to revive — and the debt problem not only evaporates, but we could start to lead the world in infrastructure (and health outcomes, and criminal justice, and education, …) again.
The best possible outcome for the US would be the immediate destruction of all of Musk’s companies and the confiscation of all his wealth.
Re:
Why?
Re: Re:
You’d be surprised at what this country could do if it had several trillion dollars of funds at its disposal to, say, feed hungry children or pay for healthcare. Those trillions won’t come from the bank accounts of the lower and middle classes unless you’re fine with working for nothing. Taxing the wealthy at levels that ensure they can still remain wealthy while giving a large chunk of their wealth to public coffers could help pay for a bunch of things that conservatives say the government can’t pay for.
Besides, being a billionaire is a moral failing. No one gets that wealthy without exploiting, or inheriting that wealth from people who exploited, a shitload of poor people.
Re: Re: Re:
yeah, ok – but the destruction of those companies destroys a lot more than just Musk, it would also cause difficulties for those employed by Musk. Why not just get rid of Musk? I thought the board of directors would’ve done that a long time ago.
I heard Trump wanted Musk to head the FCC. Or was it SCC
Re:
“I heard Trump wanted Musk to head the FCC. Or was it SCC”
Musk wants to be in charge of a new federal government agency that would be in charge of making the country efficient.
Excuse me momentarily while I finish laughing.
Yes, he wants to be the head of the Department of Government Efficiency .. or DOGE.
Re: Re:
🤔 Could just give the GAO the power it used to have and expand on it.
Re: Re:
SCC Secretary of Cost Cutting
Republican SOP
GOP: Shoots horse
GOP to press: ‘This horse is useless, it can’t go anywhere and yet the liberal democrats want the public to think it can run a race!’
Re: lol Dead Horse Theory
When you discover that you are riding a dead horse,
the best strategy is to dismount.
However …..
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Republicans are against a lot of the other stuff that go along with it, but Democrats like to cherry pick things in the bill and say “Ooh, look, Republicans don’t like poor people.” That’s all this story is
Re:
You think the heritage foundation cares what the average republican voter wants after they’ve cast their vote for trump? HF’s goal has always been consolidate all the wealth and power into a small group that certainly doesn’t include idiotic trump supporters.
Re:
Show me the lie, though.
Re:
They’re against lots of things for bad reasons what’s your point?
“Ooh, look, Republicans don’t like poor people.”
Isn’t that reason enough? It’s true, and they legislate and vote that way.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
“Should win”, the current numbers say he’s going to win. Before the usual sorts decide to label me a troll and/or downvote me into oblivion go check the fivethirtyeight subreddit, it’s looking bad for those of us who support harris. So the next solution should be how to bypass a trump FCC if that’s possible at all.
Re:
I’m not sure which is sadder, that doomers have fallen prey to some hella effective republican propaganda about how they’ve already lost weeks before the election and how they should focus on what to do afterwards instead, or they’ve done it to themselves.
If you’ve got the time and energy to doomscroll through a subreddit you’ve got the time and energy to vote and urge others to do so.
Re: Re:
What’s sadder is reading a subreddit instead of fivethirtyeight.
Re: Re:
Money talks and BS walks.
If you really want to see how bad it is, check the betting odds.