Civil Rights Complaint Filed Against Illinois Schools For Using Cops To Handle Normal Discipline Issues

from the turning-normal-misbehavior-into-criminal-charges dept

For a long time we’ve been pointing out just how dangerous it is to turn over school discipline problems to cops. Sure, there are reasons schools might need a police response to an incident, but putting cops on staff has allowed administrators to abdicate their duties and turn incidents that could be resolved by educators and parents into arrests, criminal charges, and — as is always the case when cops are involved — acts of brutality.

Cops in schools have arrested kids as young as five years old. In doing so, the only perceived obstacle is the tiny bodies, which are incapable of wearing handcuffs “properly.” Littering campuses with cops also means arresting parents for things their children have done, even when it’s nothing more than the normal creative expression expected from kids, like deploying finger guns or drawing a picture of a “bomb.”

When you turn discipline over to people who only see things in terms of criminal and non-criminal, problems arise. And when you turn this over to people in law enforcement, you also get the unadvertised add-ons: biased policing, casual violence, and a general disrespect for anyone who isn’t a cop.

It’s the biased policing that’s got the attention of two advocacy groups, who are now asking the federal government to investigate the use of “school resource officers” in Rockford, Illinois. As Jennifer Smith Richards and Jodi S. Cohen report for ProPublica, there’s a very good chance civil rights are being violated on the regular by law enforcement’s interlopers.

In a 25-page complaint against Rockford Public Schools, filed with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, the National Center for Youth Law and the MacArthur Justice Center said that Rockford police officers have been “addressing minor behaviors that should be handled as an educational matter by parents, teachers, and school leaders — and not as a law enforcement matter by police officers.”

The complaint adds: “Black students bear the brunt of this harm.”

These students tend to bear the brunt of the harm everywhere, but it’s made much worse when you add law enforcement to the equation. In Rockford, black students make up about a third of the student body across all Rockford schools. But according to the allegations made in the civil rights complaint [PDF], it’s pretty much only black students being subjected to the worst aspects of RPS’ (Rockford Public Schools) agreement with local law enforcement to provide SROs (school resource officers).

RPS has an agreement with the Rockford Police Department and, as part of its zerotolerance approach to school discipline, routinely refers students to SROs for minor alleged violations of the Code of Conduct. When RPS staff refer students to SROs, SROs in RPS frequently issue municipal tickets.

The impact of RPS’s exclusionary tactics against students of color have repeatedly played out in weekly municipal hearings at Rockford City Hall, where RPS students and their families are subjected to exorbitant fines and forced to miss school. The MacArthur Justice Center and the National Center for Youth Law attended about a dozen municipal ordinance violation hearings to observe the results of student referrals. In the times we attended these hearings, the ticketed students were almost exclusively students of color.

That’s some of the anecdotal evidence. There’s more. The complaint details the hassling of a black female student by an SRO because he claimed he had received a report of smoking in the bathroom. He also claimed the student was the only person in the bathroom at the time of the report, which was clearly false. She and her black friend were the only people subjected to a search. When she questioned the officer about being singled out, she received this response:

“Grow the [f***] up and stop acting like a little brat.”

That’s the level of professionalism we’ve come to expect from police officers when any aspect of their police work is questioned by a civilian. When that questioner is a minor, officers have even less to fear in terms of reprisal, so it can get much worse for those forced to deal with officers alone while on campus.

It’s not just the in-school cops, though. There’s evidence school administrators are aiding and abetting the biased treatment of Rockford students.

[A] Black student from Auburn High School was expelled for over one year (March 4, 2022 to June 4, 2023) over a Category 4 Fighting violation, despite evidence that the student was not at fault: multiple other students reported that the disciplined student had not instigated the altercation, the student who started the altercation admitted to doing so, video footage revealed that the disciplined student had tried to avoid the altercation, and a teacher was on the scene yet chose not to intervene for seven minutes.

That’s insane. And, somehow, it gets worse:

The teacher on scene did not provide a report, and the administrator’s reporting of the incident was inconsistent with multiple statements of witnesses who were present during the altercation. Further, when the initial administrator assigned to the case suggested a less exclusionary punishment for the student—a four-day out-of-school suspension—the administrator was removed from the case and replaced with another. The student was bullied and assaulted first, yet not only did Auburn High School staff fail to intervene, they implemented extraordinarily punitive disciplinary actions against the student.

Again, all anecdotal. But in support of the statistics, which indicate there’s definitely a civil rights problem in Rockford that needs to be looked at by the US Department of Education:

In RPS, a substantial difference has existed for years in the comparison between Black student representation in the student population and Black student representation among those who are referred to SROs for minor school disciplinary matters. In the 2021-2022 school year, Black students represented 31.38% of the student population, yet received 53.1% of referrals to SROs, a 22-point difference. In the 2022-2023 school year, Black students represented 31.03% of the student population and received 54.7% of referrals to SROs, an almost 24-point difference. Similarly, in the 2023-2024 school year (until March 24, 2024), Black students represented 31.62% of the student population, but received 54.7% of referrals to SROs, again a 23-point difference.

And even though the report talks a lot about ticketing, it must be made clear this isn’t low-level stuff, even if the underlying “violations” historically were handled with detention, short suspensions, or just a meeting with parents. Some of these tickets issued to students carry fees as high as $750 per infraction. That’s crippling, especially for low-income students and their families.

This also isn’t a new problem for Rockford. As ProPublica points out, this district was hit with a federal desegregation order after it was discovered the district had been sending black and Latino students to lower-level classes. This didn’t happen decades ago, either. That order was issued in 2001.

Hopefully, the Department of Education will take a long, hard look at this, especially given the Rockford Public Schools’ problematic racial history. And if it does, hopefully it will encourage others to start asking hard questions about police involvement in normal school discipline issues. So far, this law enforcement experiment hasn’t worked out well for students or parents, especially if they’re not white and sitting well above the poverty line.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Civil Rights Complaint Filed Against Illinois Schools For Using Cops To Handle Normal Discipline Issues”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
49 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: School Cops

Public Schools have always been casually likened to government ‘prisons’ — so the presence of armed cops (aka ‘School Resource Officers) to control the unwilling inmates is not really a conceptual anomaly.

Compulsory Education laws require compulsion and ultimately cops to enforce it, just like any other laws.
No surprise then at the steady growth of cops-in-schools and their span of ‘authority’ over students, as the vast US public school system grows ever larger.
90% of Americans attend government public schools

Bolivar diGriz (profile) says:

Re: Re: School Cops

Public Schools have always been casually likened to government ‘prisons’ — so the presence of armed cops (aka ‘School Resource Officers) to control the unwilling inmates is not really a conceptual anomaly.

You realize that other countries’ schools are not ‘government prisons’, right? Having cops on site to patrol schools and arrest children is not normal in a first-world nation. Your use of the word ‘normal’ here actually refers to a decidedly abnormal state of affairs.

MaddTheSane (profile) says:

On whose word?

Then why did you steal $500? No, you aren’t allowed to defend yourself. Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. You will be held until you confess to stealing the $5,000. You are old enough to be charged as an adult. The theft of $250,000 will follow you for the rest of your life, you felon.

And arresting a 5 year-old for cheating on a test and having a $750 fee? You are only stoking fear and hatred for police and authority figures.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

of course Timmy doesn't know, explain the whole issue

For years, we’ve been stripping schools of their ability to discipline children. More, and more the schools can’t do anything but call parents that ignore the issue. So yes, this is a natural result of removing student discipline from the schools hands.

If you wanted a different outcome, holding kids after school, taking away fun stuff, etc.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Paul b says:

Re:

Or you could ya know do a root cause analysis of the students issue and solve the problem. But I assume the root cause is mom and dad are poor and while your willing to demand all babys are born actual support for things like school breakfast and lunch are still going down the drain and our tax systems keep poor schools poor.

BernardoVerda (profile) says:

Re:

And as we have seen here, school officials don’t necessarily know how to exercise reasonable judgement, so relying on them to enforce discipline may have been problematic as well — especially in cases like described here, where the school system has clearly demonstrated a pronounced (and historically problematic) racial bias in its application of “discipline”.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

I received two suspensions in my entire school life. (As a white male). Both times, I didn’t start the fight (But I finished it). first incident was kicking away a mustard packet, that somebody stepped on. “YOU RUINED MY JORDANS! (blatant knockoffs, the logo looked like a patch was sewn on) the whole fight consisted of 5-7 minutes of dodging terrible punches. The fight ended after the other person, threw a punch, missed my head, and broke his fist by punching a wall. A knee to the chin to finish him off.

Second was in a different state. Asshole was kicking backpacks. I had a laptop. I put hand out to block the kick. non-dominant wrist and arm broken in 3 places. His kneecap broken from a front kick. He apparently still has a limp 15 years later.

Both times, there was plenty of security camera footage to show who started it.
If either of those schools had cops, or either of us had been non-white, we’d both still be in jail.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

After drinking some covfefe with horse de wormer, it was decided that nuking the hurricane would stop it from hitting Alabama as predicted in the sharpie markup map.

It is well known that grabbing a pussy means you are a very stable genius and would make a wonderful dictator. And if you disagree, you will be deported, hung or shot or something like that.

Upstream (profile) says:

Cops *are civilians*

“That’s the level of professionalism we’ve come to expect from police officers when any aspect of their police work is questioned by a civilian.”

This implies there is some distinction between cops and “civilians,” but in the US cops are civilians. Unless someone is subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), they are a civilian. This false distinction is typically made by government types and cops themselves, and really only serves to reinforce the “us versus them” mentality that we so abhorrent in cops.

We should strive to avoid this false distinction, and instead try to reinforce the truth that cops are civilians, just like us non-cops, and are generally supposed to be subject to the same laws as the rest of us, too.**

**Yes, there are a few legitimate exceptions to this, but really only a very few. The “completely above the law and completely unaccountable” status that the abomination of Qualified Immunity (aka Unqualified Impunity) has effectively granted to cops and other government types is absolutely not how things are supposed to work.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

I offer the alternative interpretation: this is the level of professionalism that we expect cops to employ when questioned by civilians, because they would use a different (presumably higher) level of professionalism when questioned by a member of the military. The military, after all, is the one entity that has bigger guns and more support from politicians than the cops.

It’s more amusing this way.

And it even broadly works, cops tend to react just as poorly to being questioned by other cops as they do to being questioned by any other civilian.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re:

This is an issue of a linguistic shift, not a misunderstanding of the nature of police employment.

People use “civilian” in contrast to “cop” to mean “non-cop,” not “non-military.” You can’t easily use citizen because not everyone a cop interacts with is a citizen. So what term can you use to mean all non-cops? “Non-cops” is awkward. “Citizens and others” is awkward.

In the same respect, people might use “politicians” and “citizens” or “voters” even though politicians are also citizens and voters.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

The thing is, it doesn’t matter what you or I think about what sounds awkward. Linguistic meaning is determined en masse through usage. If you can’t (and you probably can’t) convince large swaths of the American English-speaking population to switch from civilian to non-cops, civilian is going to (already has really) take on the meaning of “non-cop” and continue to be used that way.

Whoever says:

Re: "civilans"

This implies there is some distinction between cops and “civilians,” but in the US cops are civilians.

In the USA, all civilians are equal, but some are more equal than others.

Law enforcement personnel (and in some cases, even retired LEOs) have more powers and rights than “ordinary” civilians. It’s absurd that an off-duty and out of uniform LEO has powers that an ordinary citizen has, but that’s where the USA is today.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

I think in most places, cops are civilians with powers other civilians don’t have, and it’s that privileged position that makes them act like they’re above the law. One example is that of a call handler working for South Yorkshire Police asking about someone’s sex in clear violation of the Equality Act 2010 (they’re supposed to ask about gender/gender identity for reasons).

justice says:

hold the school admins personally responsible

school has a pattern of violating civil rights? dont just hit the school with a consent decree and a fine. start locking up the administration and the cops that violate civil rights.
maybe if the school principals spends some time in the graybar hotel the schools will start to change their tune

Anonymous Coward says:

Officer Bubba: Little susie (aged 5) said 2+2=5. Obviously brainwashed by big brother, she was going to build and set off a nuclear warhead during naptime.

So we had to dropkick her in the face repeatedly to get her to the ground, stomp on her legs, and restrain her using 1/2 a gallon of superglue (handcuffs were too big).

Judge: You sir, are the greatest hero in American History. I sentence Susie to 57yrs hard labour, AND you get her favorite barbie to wear with honor.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

The simplest way to avoid the “school-to-prison pipeline” is not to act a fool and commit crimes during the school day!

You progtards act like it’s law enforcement’s fault that low-impulse control, aspiring felons ruin class time for kids who actually want to get an education and advance in the world!!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...