More Wireless Consolidation And Price Hikes Loom As T-Mobile Eyes U.S. Cellular Merger

from the stop-me-if-you've-heard-this-one-before dept

One of the primary reasons U.S. consumers pay some of the highest prices in the developed world for mobile data is because U.S. regulators — from both parties — routinely sign off on “growth for growth’s sake” mergers that reduce competition, lower product quality, raise prices, and trigger waves upon waves of layoffs. Usually under the pretense of “amazing new synergies” and job growth.

Yet every single time the exact opposite happens. And despite this happening repeatedly, year after year, nobody learns anything from the experience because the folks doing the wheeling and dealing got what they wanted (usually tax breaks, a short-lived stock price bump, and outsized compensation packages).

We just went through this via the Sprint T-Mobile merger, during which everything deal critics predicted pretty quickly came true (including 6,000 lost jobs). Now the U.S. wireless sector is poised to consolidate further, with the news that either T-Mobile or Verizon (or some combination) will soon announce a purchase of the nation’s fourth biggest wireless carrier: U.S. Cellular:

“The WSJ reports that a T-Mobile/US Cellular “deal could be reached as soon as later this month.” Verizon reaching its own deal with US Cellular could result in “separate transactions that would give both buyers access to valuable airwaves,” the report said.”

You might recall that when the Trump DOJ and FCC greenlit the Sprint T-Mobile merger (purportedly without even reading deal impact studies) they proposed a “fix” in the form of creating a new fourth major wireless carrier out of Dish Network. But that effort has been a preposterous mess, with most predicting a likely Dish bankruptcy and spectrum sale (likely to Verizon or T-Mobile).

Wall Street demands its quarterly growth at all costs. You can’t get there by offering a quality, affordable product people like. You can get there through subscriber growth at first; but eventually as a market saturates you need to start getting creative. That usually means nickel-and-diming consumers, price hikes, weird and annoying technical restrictions, layoffs, worse customer service, and wave upon wave of otherwise pointless megamergers (you see it happening in streaming TV right now as well).

But because the folks making these decisions (revolving door regulators and over-compensated fail-upward executives) never see anything remotely resembling accountability, nobody learns anything from the experience and the consolidation machine endless repeats itself — until there’s nothing left to buy.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: t-mobile, us cellular

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “More Wireless Consolidation And Price Hikes Loom As T-Mobile Eyes U.S. Cellular Merger”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
20 Comments
Dan B says:

Wall Street demands its quarterly growth at all costs. You can’t get there by offering a quality, affordable product people like.

Meanwhile, back here in reality, offering a quality, affordable product people like is how Apple, NVIDIA, Google, and Meta became the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th biggest companies in American history.

Dan B says:

Re: Re:

Okay, I’m gonna stop you right there. Apple offers expensive elitist culture devices

Ok, I’m gonna stop you right there. There are 136 million American iPhone users. Anyone who thinks a device used by 41% of the entire US population is an “expensive elitist culture device” obviously took Donald Trump’s advice to inject themselves with bleach during lockdown.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

You’re just saying that 136 million Americans bought into an expensive elitist culture device, which includes looking down on its own users. Hence the walled garden, green message bubbles, “you’re holding it wrong,” living with broken screens, parts pairing, “genius” bar, etc. I’m not insulting the users. I’m saying Apple is abusive and bullying and profiteering. Defending that isn’t a good look.

Dan B says:

Re: Re:

And your explanation for why consumers choose overpriced bad products over the superior cheap products (which must logically exist for your subjective comparison to be true) is… what, exactly? What is the cheap, superior smartphone that the iPhone displaced? Oh yeah, there wasn’t one. What’s the superior search engine that Google displaced by offering shittier service? Oh wait, there wasn’t one.

You’re just whining that companies that are widely liked by their customers aren’t offering even more.

Mamba (profile) says:

Re:

Those are literally a list of the most premium devices in the space.

Apples phones are very expensive when compared to Android phones for the basic features.
NVIDIA has a number of very expensive solutions in the GPU and AI space, which is where all of their growth is.
Both Google and Meta change a LOT of money for their adds, because everyone else sucks balls in comparison.

Anonymous Coward says:

The FTC and DOJ only have legal authority to block mergers that “substantially lessen competition”. Congress has never passed a law giving the FTC and DOJ authority to block mergers that “cause layoffs” or “make customers unhappy” or “make products worse”.

Before the merger, 23.1% of US cellular subscribers use T-Mobile, making it the third-largest cellular subscriber. After the merger it will have 24.0% of US cellular subscribers, making it… still the third-largest US cellular subscriber. That is not a “substantial reduction in competition”. If they merged with AT&T or Verizon (or if AT&T and Verizon merged), that would be a substantial reduction in competition.

Karl’s complaining that the FTC is following the actual law instead of acting has some sort of crusading force for progressive economics. Mergers might sometimes be bad, but the government doesn’t have a blanket power to stop anything and everything it thinks is bad. We’re a mixed economy, not a fully socialized one.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Dan B says:

Re:

People don’t read Karl’s articles to learn things. Did you ever notice that almost all of his “supporting” links are to earlier opinion pieces by him?

He’s just a good source of catharsis for people who share his politics. Blah blah brunchlords blah blah mergers blah blah fail upwards etc.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the Techdirt Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...