Elon Is Now Forcing Bluechecks On Users Who Don’t Want Them, And Refusing To Let Them Hide Them

from the you-will-display-your-bluecheck-and-you-will-shut-up-about-it dept

Apparently, the forced bluechecking will continue until the culture on ExTwitter improves.

Providing a bit more confirmation to the theory that Elon’s recent decision to give free “Premium” accounts to basically anyone with a half-decent follower base was about his realization that only the absolute worst people were willing to pay for Twitter Blue, Twitter Premium, X Premium, Elon is no longer letting users hide their blue check.

Elon had previously done away with handing out verification (which had been separate from Twitter’s premium subscription offering), claiming that it was an unfair system of “lords and peasants,” and kept insisting that the only way to get a bluecheck (which he incorrectly thought was valuable) was to pay $8 (or more) a month.

Image

He has been trying to add more “features” to those who subscribe to entice more than the chud brigade to pay up. This includes having their replies appear on top of everyone else’s, access to his weak also-ran AI system, and a few other things. But it hasn’t worked. A while back, he started handing out free “Premium” accounts to big stars (the beginning of the return of lords and peasants) even if they didn’t want them.

Apparently recognizing that many users didn’t want to set fire to their reputation by admitting they were paying for what ExTwitter had become, the site did allow users who were gifted a bluecheck to hide it. That feature was rolled out last summer. It appears that too many people were using it, which appears to have ruined the whole reason Elon was giving out bluechecks. Indeed, his actions suggested that he knew that the worst thing for some people’s reputations was for people to believe they were giving money to Elon Musk.

And then, a couple weeks ago he took it to a new level, giving a free Premium account to anyone with more than 2,500 followers who also have premium accounts.

And suddenly, the lords and peasants system was back from the grave — though in a dumber, less workable fashion. But it wouldn’t accomplish the need of (1) pretending that the people who users actually cared about were willing to pay Musk, and (2) no longer hiding the replies and tweets from those users that users actually cared about, and forcibly shoving idiot chud content into their feed instead if those users given the free bluechecks could hide them.

Thus, that feature is disappearing. If Elon anoints you “a lord” of ExTwitter, goshdarnit, users are going to see that you’re a “lord” of ExTwitter, whether you like it or not.

Image

Let me translate: “we can’t admit we fucked up, but here’s a message confirming we royally fucked up.”

The hide your checkmark feature of X Premium is going away soon. Tap to manage your X Premium features.

So, we’re now back to lords and peasants where Elon gets to pick and choose who gets a free bluecheck, while suckers who can’t get popular enough on their own can buy their way in.

But, of course, all this does is underline what a complete disaster Musk’s leadership has been here. The company had a really interesting program for premium features (but under-promoted, under-explained). It also had a problematic, but functional, verification program that was never meant to be a status symbol, but rather a way to protect well-known users from impersonation.

Every one of Musk’s assumptions appears to have been wrong. The idea that the blue checkmarks were what was valuable was wrong (nope, when you changed the program, you devalued them massively). The idea that popular users would feel compelled to pay up to keep the bluechecks was wrong (nope, and in fact, many of them were happy to be rid of the buggers). The idea that making people pay for bluechecks and then prioritizing their content would stop spammers rather than (as actually happened), making it way easier for spammers to look marginally legit, by buying their way to “credibility” with Musk’s minions.

This latest move seems like the closest we’ll get to an admission that Musk fucked up. But, it really demonstrates just how desperate things have become that Musk is now handing out “verification” to basically anyone with a popular enough profile, and then forcing them to display this increasingly worthless status symbol.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: twitter, x

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Elon Is Now Forcing Bluechecks On Users Who Don’t Want Them, And Refusing To Let Them Hide Them”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
55 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

P2W

The pay-2-win phenomenon in video games and MMOs works because it’s difficult to distinguish who has paid for account boosts, versus those who didn’t pay and accomplished everything without paying extra. It’s enough of an achievement that many folks proudly proclaim their account as free-to-play.

The old Twitter 1.0 checkmark system sucked, but the Twitter 2.0 system screamed “pay-to-win”. This new X-Twitter system at least includes plausible deniability, which has been deemed somewhat acceptable by the masses.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Bloof (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Given that it’s Koby, I’d say they wouldn’t verify his favourite white nationalist blogger/youtuber and that means they were biased against conservatives, or something, despite said blogger continually violating the terms of service they agreed to when joining the platform and somehow never getting banned permenantly, with any automated bans quickly reversed once Jack Dorsey got involved behind the scenes.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

This new X-Twitter system at least includes plausible deniability

And yet, the badges will still be seen less as badges of identity/verification/notability and more as badges of dishonor. Musk owns the company and makes decisions like changing the verification system; he ultimately has no one to blame for this state of affairs but himself.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: P2w is Obvious.

with P2w, one CAN tell who has and has not paid: by the ‘gear’ they wield and areas they can survive accessing; Company policies and/or DEVs also assure one can NOT have x, y, or z ‘more powerful/feature-rich’ gear UNLESS one has paid. “you would not want anything to happen to your little character now,.. would you?”

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re:

If it is I suspect it’s going to be but the latest thing to blow up in his face and hopefully result in another exodus of users.

‘Let’s see, now that the blocker is blocking the people I want to see as well I can either disable the blocker and deal with that mess, or I can just stop using the site altogether since it’s been rendered vastly less useful to me. Choices choices…’

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

'You'll have the 'I support Elon's Twitter' mark whether you like it or not!'

It is absolutely hilarious that they would not only have the option to hide the blue checkmark but are now removing that feature, as outside of a press conference where Elon himself admits that the mark is considered a mark of shame thanks to his blundering buffoonery and worse this is the next best thing.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Ehhh, probably not. As funny an idea of Elon having his day ruined over this particular idiocy is it would be pretty trivial for them to argue that blue checkmarks are now also a sign of users with a high enough number of followers, which wouldn’t qualify as those users ‘endorsing’ the site.

Super annoying for users who do not want people to think that they were stupid enough to give Elon money? Absolutely.

Rising to the point of false endorsement charges? Doubtful.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Elon spends a lot of time engaging with far-right content, and that includes both making sporadic antisemititc posts of his own and retweeting/replying to posts about the racist “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory. I wouldn’t call him a Nazi, but even without noting how Nazi-friendly Twitter has been since the buyout, Musk is definitely Nazi-adjacent.

Winston Lawrence (user link) says:

For me and maybe a lot of us "WHO GIVES AN X?"

I have several former twitter accounts. I DONT USE TWITTER OR X. I occasionally use my Mastodon (pre Musk on Twitter if it matters) accounts. BUT Musk, who I used to actually like, seems like an “I GOTS MONEY” fool. so blue green or red check marks twitter/X is on my domain block-list I couldn’t go there if I was stupid enough to even try.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...