Netflix Eyes More Price Hikes… And Slowly, Steadily Becoming More Like Comcast

from the from-disruption-to-turf-protection dept

Despite a lot of rhetoric by customers about how they were sick of Netflix price hikes and headed to the exits, the company’s latest earnings report showed impressive growth. The company added 13.1 million customers worldwide in the fourth quarter, up from the 8.76 million added the previous quarter. All told, the once-disruptive streaming upstart now has 260.8 million customers worldwide.

Netflix likes to vaguely imply (and the press likes to parrot without evidence) that much of the growth came courtesy of its unpopular crackdown on password sharing (a practice Netflix once encouraged). In reality, Netflix can’t (and doesn’t) really track how many customers signed up due to the crackdown. And most of the 13.1 million in growth came from Europe (it added 1.2 million subscribers in the States).

A much more likely contributor to Netflix’s continued growth? The company’s ongoing embrace of cheaper ad-based subscription tiers, which are particularly attractive to folks without oodles of disposable income who don’t really care about things like HD or 4K video quality. The company says it now has more than 23 million monthly members subscribed to the cheaper (for now) ad-based tiers.

It’s fairly obvious that Netflix won this phase of the streaming TV wars.

Here’s the thing: as subscriber growth becomes saturated, Netflix has to keep providing Wall Street with those sweet, improved quarterly returns at any cost. To do that they’re going to follow directly on the heels of the cable giants (like Charter and Spectrum) the company once disrupted. That means more and more price hikes, and greater and greater restrictions and annoyances.

Netflix is already preparing investors for a new round of price hikes this year. It’s also eliminating its cheapest ad-free tier, adopting the longstanding Comcast practice of luring you in with one price, then steadily upselling you to more expensive tiers. That’s in addition to the password sharing crackdown, which is basically double dipping (since Netflix already charged more for more simultaneous streams).

As the company tries to please everyone, everywhere and cater to the lowest common denominator at scale, the company’s catalog also starts to have less high quality original content and more derivative dreck a la USA Network or TNT in a bid to cut corners:

“Netflix’s days of chasing prestige might be rapidly coming to an end with this sharp reversal of the streaming golden age replaced by something akin to Spike TV circa 2005. Or USA Network circa 2011.”

So lower quality, greater volume, higher prices, more restrictions. That’s the exact hole companies like Comcast fell into from the 90s into the early 00s. For public companies it’s not good enough to provide a quality, affordable product people like. You have to see consistent quarterly growth; and once the market for streaming saturates, you have to seek that growth out in creative (and obnoxious) ways.

Clearly that transformation from innovation and disruption to lazy turf protection will take a while. Based on growth numbers, Netflix obviously still provides great value to folks. Streaming customer service and satisfaction data still well outperforms cable TV. And when it comes to streaming, unlike cable, it’s still easy to binge watch Netflix’s catalog for a month then cancel with relative ease.

But if this follows cable’s trajectory (and there’s really no reason to think it won’t since executives in the streaming space have made it clear they learned absolutely nothing from Comcast’s run in with cord cutters) I think there will be several clear hints that Netflix has started to truly jump the shark.

I suspect that you’ll start to see more quality control issues and a notable decline in customer service, usually the first thing to be sacrificed on the altar in the quest for growth and scale.

You’ll see more and more examples of the upward pricing funnel where basic features are hidden away in more expensive plans (see: Verizon Wireless forcing you to pay more for HD, or Comcast imposing pointless usage caps you have to pay extra to bypass). You’re already seeing that at Amazon, where they introduced new ads then charged Prime customers paying $140 annually extra to bypass them.

You’ll also likely see a steady uptick in the volume of ads, the creation of obnoxious bullshit fees (household quality streaming priority surcharge!), and eventually, Netflix will likely make it a pain in the ass to cancel service. I know this because I’ve covered media and telecom in a country with sagging regulatory oversight for decades, and all the financial incentives always point in the wrong direction when it comes to the near-mindless pursuit of unprecedented scale and never-ending growth.

Again we’re not there yet, and there’s clear evidence that customers remain largely satisfied with Netflix service. But the writing is pretty clearly on the wall. As the quality sags, the restrictions emerge, and the prices steadily creep skyward, more and more users will shift to free services (YouTube, Twitch, TikTok, or piracy) something streaming execs will blame on absolutely anything and everything but themselves.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: netflix

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Netflix Eyes More Price Hikes… And Slowly, Steadily Becoming More Like Comcast”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
22 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

IMHO, It’s less like Comcast, and more like Gold’s Gym: Get those auto-renewals, and even if people don’t like paying, they’d rather keep complaining and tricking themselves into thinking ‘next month will be better’ than digging out that long-lost password to cancel.

Subscriptions rely on a sort of psychological momentum. It takes a lot to get derailed.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Beatings will continue to ramp up to ensure profits will as well

Ever increasing prices for ever decreasing quality, making it so that anyone that wants to try the service must pay to do so since password sharing is a heinous crime against nature and now cutting out the cheapest offerings so people have no choice but to ‘upgrade’ their plans…

They may have conned more people to sign up and padded their numbers in the short-term but long term they seem damned determined to sink the company by making a speed run to the good old corporate death spiral.

John85851 (profile) says:

Why isn't there more outrage over double dipping

It seems like most (or all) reports about ad-supported tiers make it seem like a good thing.
Why isn’t there more outrage about how this us double-dipping? People pay a subscription fee, so the streaming service gets their income, but then the streaming service also runs ads, which is more income.
I completely understand that free services like network TV, YouTube, and even Freevee need to run ads, and I don’t mind watching those ads.
But if I’m paying for a service, I don’t expect the show or movie to be interrupted by ads.

Why aren’t these companies called out for their greed? Or is this practice perfectly fine since it returns more money to the investors, even at the expense of delivering a good experience?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Why isn’t there more outrage

Does the world really need more outrage? If Netflix sucks, don’t use it. Tell them why you canceled or why you won’t subscribe. Maybe suggest to your friends and family that they do the same, to protest the “double dipping”.

But skip the outrage. It’s just TV.

Or is this practice perfectly fine since it returns more money to the investors, even at the expense of delivering a good experience?

It’s up to all consumers, as a group, to decide whether it’s fine. So far, Netflix executives are obviously receiving the message that it is.

Magazines and newspapers got away with this “double dipping” for years; still do, to the extent they continue to exist. And, really, it’s “triple dipping”, because many have also always abused the private data of their customers by selling it.

Slow Joe Crow says:

Too late I already canceled my subscription

I dumped Netflix in the fall when they announced the previous price hike and I analyzed what I wasn’t getting for my money. I still get weekly emails begging me to come back. I suspect other services may feel the axe. I got the Prime showing ads but apparently my shows haven’t been hit yet, and I won’t pay extra

Anonymous Coward says:

That’s pretty much always the same problem with “users”: what is a user?
Is creating a free account and using it once is counted as user?
Are users just browsing the catalog are also counted as active?
How much of their users they announced they’ve got are still using the service?
Are “extra” user (sharing the same account by paying) are also users?

Metrics are hard and Wall Street don’t care about precision. Only quantity matters.

Bobson Dugnutt (profile) says:

Re:

They’re hoping wrestling fans will pay.

Raw will leave USA, but USA will get Smackdown, which had been airing on Fox broadcast stations.

Netflix will probably also get what are called Premium Live Events (the new name for pay-per-view), but it’s not known what will happen to the WWE Network archive of old footage. WWE spent the late 2000s and 2010s buying up footage libraries to build out an incredible vault of wrestling content.

Anonymous Coward says:

This post has no facts and lots of fear mongering… Someday we might see.. this or that… such as a decrease in customer service… What customer service you pay your bill or you don’t. There is no undecipherable teirs or packages that need explanation or upselling. No equipment they must support, no hoops to jump through to cancel. It’s one of the many reasons why they are able to be so competitive… simplicity

What this topic misses is how offering a great product at a great price in a simple and easy way to access with limited barriers is why they are so big and popular.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

“What this topic misses is how offering a great product at a great price ”

and now from the cheer leading section comes some unmitigated advertising for a crap over priced pos.

What is a corporation to do when their potential customers are not being paid enough to afford the product/service you are trying to sell?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...