Amazon Gives Giant Middle Finger To Prime Video Customers, Will Charge $3 Extra A Month To Avoid Ads Starting In January

from the oh-look-we've-learned-nothing dept

Thanks to industry consolidation and saturated market growth, the streaming industry has started behaving much like the traditional cable giants they once disrupted.

As with most industries suffering from “enshittification,” that generally means imposing obnoxious new restrictions (see: Netflix password sharing), endless price hikes, and obnoxious and dubious new fees geared toward pleasing Wall Street’s utterly insatiable demand for improved quarterly returns at any cost.

All while the underlying product quality deteriorates due to corner cutting and employees struggle to get paid (see: the giant, ridiculous turd that is the Time Warner Discovery merger).

Case in point: Amazon customers already pay $15 per month, or $139 annually for Amazon Prime, which includes a subscription to Amazon’s streaming TV service. In a bid to make Wall Street happy, Amazon recently announced it would start hitting those users with entirely new streaming TV ads, something you can only avoid if you’re willing to shell out an additional $3 a month.

There was ample backlash to Amazon’s plan, but it apparently accomplished nothing. Amazon says it’s moving full steam ahead with the plan, which will begin on January 29th:

“We aim to have meaningfully fewer ads than linear TV and other streaming TV providers. No action is required from you, and there is no change to the current price of your Prime membership,” the company wrote. Customers have the option of paying an additional $2.99 per month to keep avoiding advertisements.”

If you recall, it took the cable TV, film, music, and broadcast sectors the better part of two decades before they were willing to give users affordable, online access to their content as part of a broader bid to combat piracy. There was just an endless amount of teeth gnashing by industry executives as they were pulled kicking and screaming into the future.

Despite having just gone through that experience, streaming executives refuse to learn anything from it, and are dead set on nickel and diming their users. This will inevitably drive a non-insignificant amount of those users back to piracy, at which point executives will blame the shift on absolutely everything and anything other than themselves. And the cycle continues in perpetuity…

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,
Companies: amazon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Amazon Gives Giant Middle Finger To Prime Video Customers, Will Charge $3 Extra A Month To Avoid Ads Starting In January”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
53 Comments
DB (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The next-day and two day shipping can be a huge positive for certain items. Dismissing that advantage as “have a little patience” and “plan ahead” is insulting.

Looking at my recent purchases, I spot a few where quick delivery was very important. Cold medicine, a car window regulator for a stuck-open window, dishwasher parts, a washing machine lid switch, and a few other replacement parts. For some of those the alternative to quick delivery would have been an immediate drive to a shop that had them in stock.

Chris ODonnell (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I have never trusted Amazon, or any online retailer, for stuff I really needed in a day or two. If I need cold medication, I’ll go to the local drug store and buy it, thereby insuring I have it when I need it.

I don’t know if it’s a temporary promo or what, but our last 2 or 3 online orders with Walgreens have been delivered by Doordash within a couple of hours of placing the order, without paying for any upcharge in shipping. Walmart also frequently dispatches the delivery from the local store and delivers same day under the normal free shipping option. Prime’s advantage on delivery times evaporated a while ago.

freakanatcha (profile) says:

I get the feeling Amazon will tell me they are enhancing the customer experience?

Make book on it! In a few months, Amazon prime will place pop-up QR codes in the middle of the screen during the film that link to the Amazon page with the shirt the actor is wearing, or their electronic device, or the furniture, or the song…

Follows Google image search that can immediately identify clothing (and where to buy it), but seems lost in identifying the person you are searching.

2nd Make book on it: Amazon will hide the switch to turn off the QR codes, knowing you’ll give up soon enough.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

More competition in the advertising market, reducing the value of any slot, resulting in the advertiser being able to buy more slots, and services selling more slots to try to keep up income, and more adverts are shoved in front of people. Also, with the same advertising budgets spread across more services, the less each service can make from advertising.

Anonymous Coward says:

We’ve been trying some other online ordering, 2-day delivery services. Walmart turns out to be excellent. I use Amazon Prime for many fixit items, ranging from computer gizmos to tools and tractor parts. Maybe Home Depot will wake up and appreciate the opportunity to disrupt a goodly part of Amazon’s business…or not 🙁

John85851 (profile) says:

I got that email last night

I got that email last night.
So let me get this straight: one of the largest companies on the planet, which brings in billions of dollars needs MORE money from advertising to fund their shows?
I watch Amazon Prime BECAUSE there are no commercials. If I want to want TV with commercials, I’ll turn on any of my cable channels.

And I don’t see if this policy includes movies people pay to rent or buy. If I pay $4.50 to rent a movie, will I have to sit through the same ads as if the movie was shown on network TV?
In that case, I’ll go to Redbox and rent it, and not give Amazon any more money.

Michael says:

I canceled my prime membership

…about a month ago. The $2.99 extortion was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Over the years, I’ve spent thousands of dollars with amazon (in addition to the $139 yearly prime membership). And they want an extra $3 to NOT show me commercials in their shows? FUCK THEM!

I’ve quit shopping at amazon. Instead, I drive to Best Buy, to Target, to my local hardware store and buy whatever I need. Or occasionally, I’ll use eBay.

The only thing I’m buying off amazon now are kindle books and new (digital) movies (although eBay does have most new release 4K UHD movies available, and cheaper than amazon, often with free shipping).

Fuck jeff bezos and the horse he rode in on.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anathema Device (profile) says:

There is no way this isn’t going to backfire on Amazon, especially where people are only interested in streaming choices. They are much more expensive than Disney+, yet their content is much worse, and consumers have a plethora of better choices.

Even YouTube Premium is a better deal because there is so much more and so much better content to be had ad free.

It’s just going to make customers go ‘yeah, nah’, and find better things to do with their money.

Pete says:

theft of service?

It seems to me that if I have a (Amazon Prime) contract, then they are required to provide the services contracted. To take away some of those services during the contract period seems to me to be theft of service or conversion of funds.

A different pricing model might be more effective and less regressive: how many Amazon orders do you make in a year? or spend how much money on those products? how many of hours of ad-supported streaming are you already watching?

Now model that info and come up with a per customer value with some upper limit charge / month.

Childhoods End says:

Hmmmmm

So, first it was 1 day shipping that constantly took 2 or more days. Now 2 day takes 3 or more days. Before this latest BS, I noticed pricing on Amazon has now exceeded where you can get it elsewhere with the same shipping for a less monthly charge; hmmmmm. And now you want to add a $3 charge to the monthly amount so I’m not inundated with relentless advertising.

Blow me Amazon, do you hear the door shutting?

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

I’m debating

Depends on what they mean by advertising. If it’s useful targeted advertising, and limited in times and duration, I’m not bothered by it. If it’s a new 2 minute advert ever 5 or 10 minutes, the $2.99 would be worth it.
The cost increases in prime are well below inflation so I’m not bothered. The site is my primary shopping source and I rarely have items delayed or late. I use the video service almost daily. Sounds fair to me.

nwalter61 says:

Seriously???

At 1st I thought this was a joke: Amazon is going to charge me to watch the shows that I purchased in my library…(the majority of which have been there for over 8 years…30 or so…entire TV series & movies…)if I DON’T want to see ADS??? This is a bajillion dollar company who keeps jacking up our Prime rates year after year…now THIS??? How much money do they need???

NoLifeDGenerate (user link) says:

Two things they need to change

  1. They need to stop trying to re-invent the wheel. Drop the whole season at once like Netflix and stop screwing over the binge crowd.
  2. They need to separate the shipping Prime from the streaming service. I only want to pay for shipping. I’ll never use Prime in spite of paying for it. I torrent Reacher after each season fully airs and watch it that way until the disc releases. Then I buy the disc. Piss on em.
Jeff Relth says:

Charging for no ads on prime video

We already pay more and more each year for prime membership. Jeff Bezos will never spend all the income he gets from us. Amazon is rich beyond belief. They have no competition to speak of. And now they black mail us to watch movies without ads. That was what we agreed to in the first place. This move is called GREED. Pure and simple. Why not take super care of your customers instead of giving them the finger, because that is what this is. Amazon needs to be punished is it does not give this greed up. We are the ones making it successful. Wouldn’t it be righteous is a $3 a month charge put them in their place.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...