Apple Cancelled Jon Stewart Because Feckless Tech Executives Were Afraid Of The Pesky Truth

from the what-editorial-firewall dept

Last week, the New York Times reported that Apple had cancelled “The Problem With Jon Stewart.” More importantly, the Times noted that Apple executives, clearly not at all worried about the need for a healthy editorial firewall, had grown uncomfortable with the way that the program was planning to cover issues such as China and AI:

“Mr. Stewart and Apple executives had disagreements over some of the topics and guests on “The Problem,” two of the people said. Mr. Stewart told members of his staff on Thursday that potential show topics related to China and artificial intelligence were causing concern among Apple executives, a person with knowledge of the meeting said. As the 2024 presidential campaign begins to heat up, there was potential for further creative disagreements, one of the people said.”

It’s an embarrassing and ridiculous look for Apple, whose global expansion ambitions were in no way meaningfully threatened by a talk show that hadn’t seen widespread success. But both the Times story and this follow up Hollywood Reporter story make it abundantly clear that Apple executives thought they could bully Stewart into softening his coverage of key tech issues:

Sources tell THR that there had been tension between Apple and Stewart ahead of the show’s third season return over topics featured on The Problem. Those same sources note that Apple approached Stewart and informed the host that both sides needed to be “aligned” regarding topics on the show. Stewart, sources say, balked at the idea of being “hamstrung” by Apple, which threatened to cancel the series. Stewart, sources say, wanted to have full creative control of the series and, after Apple threatened to cancel the series, told the tech company that he was walking away from the show rather than have his hands tied.

You genuinely don’t see business decisions this myopically stupid very often. Sure, CNET once refused to give Dish Network a CES award because its parent company at the time (CBS) was engaged in a legal fight over ad-skipping. And there was that time that Verizon tried to launch a news empire but then banned its “reporters” from covering issues like net neutrality or mass surveillance.

But generally speaking, even the dumbest tech sector executives know that it’s an extremely bad look to engage in this kind of heavy-handed meddling with journalistic integrity. Especially given that nothing Stewart could have possibly said about China or the AI hype cycle isn’t being said at a hundred other news outlets, many of which have significantly larger reach.

It’s a lovely example of how tech companies won’t be saving journalism anytime soon because they simply lack the ethics or integrity for the job.

There’s no shortage of tech billionaires and executives, like Elon Musk, who see critical journalism as a mortal enemy that’s out to unfairly get them, not as an essential function of a healthy society. Then there’s a parade of other tech executives (many of whom own media companies) who just don’t care; they prefer news simulacrum — something that looks news-ish and is peppered with the kind of shallow techno-optimism guys like Marc Andreessen prefer, but generally doesn’t ask hard questions or look under the hood.

Apple’s decision comes at a time when U.S. journalism is increasingly on its back foot thanks to decades of incompetent mismanagement and layoffs. It also comes at a time when propaganda and disinformation routinely see as much if not more reach than many traditional news organizations. The result is a dumber, more divided public and even a measurable shift in electoral outcomes.

Tech giants may be financially well positioned to help in the ongoing fight between foundational truth and delusion. But not, apparently, if doing so requires the slightest bit of ethical backbone. What U.S. journalism desperately needs are leaders with bold new ideas for creative new journalism funding models that scale. What it’s getting instead is a rotating crop of the biggest, thinnest-skinned babies imaginable.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: apple

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Apple Cancelled Jon Stewart Because Feckless Tech Executives Were Afraid Of The Pesky Truth”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
63 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
NotTheMomma (profile) says:

I honestly feel that Mr. Stewart would be just fine do his own Youtube channel. He has such a large following. I say large, really it is a cult following almost. I personally love the guy. I would think he would make a good member of congress but know that he would have issue with both sides of the isle as he is definitely for the people far more than the average congressman.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

What is this cult of which you speak? I must be living under a rock because I do not see the cult behaviors amongst those who watch Jon Stewart. I do however see such behavior from Trump supporters.

“Cult is a term, in most contexts pejorative, for a relatively small group which is typically led by a charismatic and self-appointed leader, who excessively controls its members, requiring unwavering devotion to a set of beliefs and practices which are considered deviant (outside the norms of society)”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Both the older and more recent implications of “cult” do not have the “really Bad” meaning. Actually, the is only one sense of the word that implies bad things, and many which do not. If you want to be nit-picky language police, at least be right.

i’m just going back to watching the cult classic Plan 9 From Outer Space, thanks.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

because there’s no way a big tech company like, say, Google, would try to interfere

Well, not so overtly, right? Google would make it look like incompetence, or that someone else was to blame (“three strikes” for copyright could be easily arranged if Stewart ever dealt with music or movies). Netflix would cancel it for no fucking reason, as is their wont—one more body among foundations. It’s rather surprising that Apple would actually say that it’s because Jon was making them look bad.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

It’s rather surprising that Apple would actually say that it’s because Jon was making them look bad.

It’s like they had no idea who Stewart was, and were maybe only hiring based on market research. To quote Anthony Jeselnik: “I assume you guys all knew who you were coming to see tonight. But if you didn’t, you sure as shit know now.”

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
cassandra says:

re: techno-optimism: I’m plenty optimistic about technology. It’s neat. The problem is people using it for unethical, short-sighted, and selfish purposes, from planned obsolescence to mass surveillance. I’m all for advancing science and technology but there’s no single magical panacea that enough VC money will uncover and thereby fix the human condition.

alphonsetomato (profile) says:

Re: technology

Technology can be useful and neat (it can also be dangerous and dehumanizing, but that’s for another day). “The problem is people using it for unethical, short-sighted, and selfish purposes”. Those people are often the ones who own and control the tech companies, and whose primary goal is to amass wealth and power for their company and themselves. Such as in the current instance.

Anonymous Coward says:

Tech companys think news is not worth the trouble of possibly getting sued for posting links in canada or having to employ staff to moderate on sensitive topics like the mideast war
they can get views without posting serious news articles
China provides a large part of apples profit plus most iphones are made there
apple prefers to make drama or comedy tv programs
that do not risk annoying china to making
serious current affairs news programs

look to websites like drudge or huff post or even cnn mnbc tv for seriouse news

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

No, I’m using it as a descriptor for the Chinese and their army of disinfo agents. That is what they call them, on account of them allegedly being paid fifty cents per disinfo post.

They have a big ass army of disinfo agents, some of them are actually overseas.

And, well, the Russians are effectively a Chinese tributary.

Would you prefer I call them traitors instead?

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4

the obvious Xi bootlickers

To my knowledge, we only have one semi-regular uses-a-name poster who would fit that description (“Valis”, I think they’re called). Every time you accuse someone else of being a “Xi bootlicker”, you do so without any proof beyond their contrarianism⁠—and any dipshit troll from anywhere can be a contrarian. Your use of “wumao” comes off not as an attempt to call out conflict peddlers and disinformation agents working for the Chinese government, but as a way to slur Chinese people as a whole under the guise of calling out nationalist trolls. And while I can’t speak for everyone (including Techdirt’s owners/operators), I would certainly appreciate you not using “wumao” as a regular insult towards any of the usual trolls regardless of whether you believe they’re an agent of the Chinese government.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Bruce C. says:

Only reason I can think of...

The only reason I can think of for Apple to take this approach was because their mouth is glued to the bung-hole of the Chinese government (where the iPhones come out?). If anyone is likely to overreact to criticism, it’s either the CCP or Donald Trump, and I don’t think Apple has a lot of business with Florida Man.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Rico R. (profile) says:

Think different.*

*This phrase does not include issues such as artificial intelligence, China, the right to repair movement, DMCA § 1201, jailbreaking, hackintoshing, or any other view that does not align with the views of Apple, Inc, truth in journalism standards notwithstanding. And no, this does not make our 1984 ads ironic or make Steve Jobs roll in his grave; we have only welcomed change in the world if it is a change that will benefit us as a corporation.

Anonymous Coward says:

Apple is mainly a tech and hardware company. Any steps in a news/entertainment direction are heading away from their core business (and competencies).

In their core business, that kind of bullying usually works. For the foreseeable future those core business interests will keep totally overshadowing — and hindering — any expansion plans outside their core business.

ECA (profile) says:

it was said

what is that word?
INTEGRITY?
Long ago there was an award created based on 1 persons integrity.
Edward R. Murrow award
I looked this up a few years back, and it seemed that Every channel and agency HAD ONE.
And it looked as if all you needed was to donate money to the Company handing them out.

the only news I really watch is weather.90% of the rest is buried in BS and un-needed commentary.

Finding NEWS/information Im willing to listen to, and wonder about, and THINK about, isnt that easy. trying to change MINDS isnt easy anymore as you have to contend with TONS of BS rolling down hill.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...