NY AG Doles Out Wrist Slap Fine To Companies That Helped Telecom Giants Use Fake And Dead People To Lie About Net Neutrality
from the fake-plastic-trees dept
You might recall how when U.S. telecom giants lobbied the Trump FCC to kill net neutrality, they hired a bunch of PR firms to flood the FCC with fake comments from a bunch of fake and dead people. The goal: create the illusion of support for shitty, unpopular policies. It’s a pretty popular tactic by corporations and lobbying firms looking to influence the government and/or create the illusion of consensus.
In 2021, New York Attorney General Leticia James unveiled a report (also see accompanying statement) proving what most people already knew: the broadband industry was behind the use of fake and dead people to generate bogus support for the FCC’s controversial 2017 repeal of net neutrality. The report didn’t name any specific broadband companies and only singled out the proxy firms they used.
Several years later, and James’ office has finally managed to dole out a wrist slap fine ($615,000) for the three PR and policy firms used by the broadband industry: LCX Digital Media, Lead ID, LLC., and Ifficient Inc. All three “lead generation” companies also worked for other companies looking to influence policies at agencies like the EPA. And not for the betterment of competent policymaking or mankind.
Once again, none of the telecom monopolies that actually hired the firms (Comcast and AT&T are often suspected to be the most active in these kinds of campaigns) are even named in the announcement, despite James likely knowing full well who paid for these “services.” In a statement, James tries to pretend that such a half-assed penalty will actually change anything:
“No one should have their identity co-opted by manipulative companies and used to falsely promote a private agenda,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James in an announcement Wednesday.
Again, these fake comment efforts are glorified propaganda campaigns by deep-pocketed corporations designed to provide flimsy cover for corrupt and captured regulators to make policy decisions that are opposed by a majority of Americans (the repeal of net neutrality saw widespread, bipartisan opposition).
One such effort plagued a proceeding at the Labor Department, where numerous people who either don’t exist or don’t recall ever sending messages breathlessly opposed agency efforts to prevent conflicts of interest in retirement advice. The same problem plagued the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau when it proposed a rule trying to rein in some of the nastier habits of the payday lending industry.
Nobody in government or policy circles ever seems to show much interest in getting to the bottom of this problem. The public rarely can be bothered to care either (kudos to you if you made it this far down this article). And in the rare instance where somebody does act (like the NY AG), the fines are a tiny pittance in relation to whatever policy proposal the companies were attempting to game out.
Now pause for a moment and consider how “AI” tech like ChatGPT will make these kinds of lobbying influence and propaganda campaigns cheaper and easier than ever just as we face a well-funded, deeply coordinated campaign to finally and fully defang the regulatory state once and for all.
Filed Under: broadband, chevron deference, consumer rights, fake comments, fcc, letitia james, net neutrality, propaganda, regulators, trump
Companies: ifficient, lcx digital media, lead id


Comments on “NY AG Doles Out Wrist Slap Fine To Companies That Helped Telecom Giants Use Fake And Dead People To Lie About Net Neutrality”
And the root?
Is that the gov. thinks it Shouldnt be Public. How many times have you Ever gotten a letter or News about the Gov. wanting you to send letters or Email, or Anything to tell them what to do?
Never, ever, ever, ever.
A reason can be added to this.
They would have to READ IT ALL and decide WHICH pile it goes to.(Democracy at its best) Which would require a Large team and TIME to go thru all the crap and figure out Where we/they stand.
How to fix? Bad and Chip everyone. WONT HAPPEN.
NOW
If the other states would Jump in, and Sue them based on the loss IN NY..
A bunch of fake and dead people?
One of the “people” that argued “against” N.N. in the FCC “public comment” was Me, I was neither dead nor fake, and Me and I support N.N. then, before & now.
We have never ever argued against net neutrality.
As a living person, harmed by this fraud, how do I get my cut of this $615k settlement?
P.S. The name and signature on the purported comment was a unique non-standard affectation. I acquired my .com/email in 1995.
P.P.S. I tracked down Kevin Martin in the men’s room during a Congressional hearing on the Comcast-NBC merger, he invited me for orange juice& crumpets to further the discussion, but i declined.
P.P.P.S. My 16 year old Daughter delivered a spirited comment during FCC public hearings at USC in 2008, perhaps Martin remembered:)
The Federal wire fraud statute of limitations is ten years from the date of the crime.
'Anything but the briar patch...'
Half a million fine to the cut-out companies for mass fraud involving using identities of dead people to present a false support for a government decision… yup, that’ll certainly teach them(to ask for at least one million the next time the companies hiring them want something similar.)
Anyone else notice that Richard Bennett has gone incredibly quiet over the last few years?
My money’s on an ivermectin dose.
What's the point?
The point here isn’t that the regulators are fooled by what’s going on. All they are doing is insisting that companies do a better job of faking their supporters comments, not jobs so bad even a disaffected crack head sees through it.
If a common citizen did this sort of thing, they would go to PRISON, and rightfully so. Yet another example of how corporations are NOT people, and never will be. If the laws had teeth, these clowns would have never had the nerve to commit these crimes. I’d be willing to bet they BUDGETED for the fines they wound up paying. “Cost of doing business”, much like Mitt Romney’s boat ramp escapade. When the penalty means nothing, there is no deterrent. They should be PUT OUT OF BUSINESS for this, but you “can’t stifle the job creators”. We are headed into the new feudalism at top speed…
But Karl, Mike has been saying that AI is going to lead us into the promised land of boundless innovation and anybody who said different was a Luddite shill for the copyright industry. Surely there can’t be bad consequences of new technology?
Re:
Shhh honey. The adults are talking.
Re: Re:
No argument, just patronising dismissal. Seems about right for this place.
Re: Re: Re:
Your Bayside Advisory defense was not successful. But then you are copyright law’s best and brightest.
Re: Re: Re:2
I know you are but what am I?
Re: Re: Re:
“This place is a cesspit” whined the troll who just left the steaming turd on the floor.
Re: Re: Re:2
Oh look, you’ve found a second joke! Well done, maybe you’ll find something worthwhile to say next.