DOJ Charges Officers For No Knock Warrant Lies That Led To The Killing Of Breonna Taylor

from the police-accountability dept

There are very few things that are more dangerous for citizens and cops than no-knock warrants. These warrants allow cops to raid houses without announcing themselves, leading those on the receiving end to assume they’re being invaded by armed criminals.

People who don’t know they’re dealing with cops defend themselves. Cops, who believe everyone should know they’re cops despite being allowed to enter unannounced, respond violently. People die. In some cases, cops die. And all that’s needed to allow cops to treat people as hostile combatants — even when they’ve been startled awake by armed intruders — is some boilerplate presented to a judge who’s also been roused from their slumber to sign off on some state-sanctioned violence.

Limitation of this power has been hit and miss. It’s usually prompted by a high profile killing that police can’t manage to cover up. More pressure to alter the rules of combat has been applied by other high profile killings by officers that didn’t involve no-knock warrants. The unilateral power to kill when officers willingly place themselves in danger has seen even more judicial and legislative scrutiny in recent months, but there’s still a whole lot of work to be done before cops stop considering themselves an unassailable blend of James Bond and the Punisher when engaging in warrant service.

The killing of Breonna Taylor by Louisville, Kentucky police has prompted reforms in Kentucky, as well as in nearby states. Seven officers stormed Taylor’s apartment, supposedly in search of Jamarcus Glover and Adrian Walker — both of whom were suspected of selling drugs out of a house located nearly 10 miles away from Taylor’s residence.

Officers executed the no-knock warrant On March 13, 2020. Taylor and her boyfriend, Kenneth Walker (no relation to Adrian Walker) were awoken by the raid and assumed criminals were entering the house. Walker fired one shot at the intruders. The intruding cops fired 32 shots. None hit Walker but Breonna Taylor was hit by six bullets and died. Neither person in the house was a criminal suspect. And, while officers claimed they announced themselves, Walker stated he heard no announcement and the cops were in possession of a no-knock warrant.

The assault and attempted murder charges brought against Walker for firing a single warning shot (which struck an officer’s leg) were dismissed with prejudice a year later. One cop was fired for “firing blindly” through a covered window into the apartment. The city paid out a $12 million settlement to Taylor’s family. Later that year, the fired officer (Brett Hankinson) was indicted on wanton endangerment charges.

The fallout continues. The US Department of Justice has filed its own charges against some of the involved officers.

The federal charges announced today allege:

– that members of [LMPD’s] Place-Based Investigations Unit falsified the affidavit used to obtain the search warrant of Ms. Taylor’s home;

that this act violated federal civil rights laws;

and that those violations resulted in Ms. Taylor’s death.

Specifically, we allege that Ms. Taylor’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated when defendants Joshua Jaynes, Kyle Meany, and Kelly Goodlett sought a warrant to search Ms. Taylor’s home knowing that the officers lacked probable cause for the search.

We allege that the defendants knew the affidavit in support of that warrant contained false and misleading information and that it omitted material information.

Among other things, the affidavit falsely claimed that officers had verified that the target of the alleged drug trafficking operation had received packages at Ms. Taylor’s address. In fact, Defendants Jaynes and Goodlett knew that was not true.

We further allege that Defendants Jaynes and Meany knew the search warrant would be carried out by armed LMPD officers, and that conducting that search could create a dangerous situation for anyone who happened to be in Ms. Taylor’s home.

In other words, cops lied. Several cops lied. These lies were presented to a judge who then gave them permission to perform a violent entry and respond violently when someone with a legally obtained gun responded to the unidentified violent threat he was faced with. The guy with the legal gun fired one shot. Cops responded with a hail of gunfire, killing a person who had done nothing more than be rudely awakened by the unexpected presence of people wielding weapons.

Lying on a warrant application is just regular police work, as defense attorney Scott Greenfield points out. It happens so often and so casually that a cop failing to add a few lies is probably considered incapable of handling affidavit paperwork.

Out of thousand of cases I’ve defended, I can count on less than one hand the number of times there was no lie told. The vast majority of times the lie is tangential, filling in a gap here or there that needs to appear filled for the sake of court but wasn’t deemed worthy of actual concern on the street. So the cops don’t know? They make it up. They fill in the blanks. They know what the right words are and say them.

Most of the time, the lies come after the fact, when the defendant has been busted, the contraband seized, the warm glow of knowing you framed the guilty filling the courtroom. The cops know it. The prosecutors know it. Even the judge knows it, and knows that without it, there were be a lot more work, more expense, more griping and fewer cases made. And it’s not as if the defendants aren’t guilty, right?

But every so often, the lies result in innocent people being killed. Cops consider this acceptable collateral damage. The public does not. Courts vary in their determinations. Sometimes lives are worth respecting. At other times, the deaths are just the unfortunate side effect of law enforcement work.

But the DOJ’s indictments send a message: cops who lie face the chance (however small) of being prosecuted for misleading their way into an unjustified killing. The odds still favor cops who don’t give a shit, but any reduction in the odds of getting away with it is something to be noted. Until the entire system starts treating police misconduct seriously, it’s probably best to hold our applause. But this is still an anomaly worth noting. Sometimes cops don’t get away with their lies. And if this means even a handful cops across the nation will think twice before loading up warrant applications with unjustified assertions, it may allow innocent people to avoid be killed in a hail of cop gunfire.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DOJ Charges Officers For No Knock Warrant Lies That Led To The Killing Of Breonna Taylor”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
89 Comments
Anonymous Attorney says:

The assault and attempted murder charges brought against Walker for firing a single warning shot (which struck an officer’s leg) were dismissed with prejudice a year later.

Which was the correct decision, though I’m sure Techdirt’s resident violent cop apologist will claim Kenneth Walker should be serving a life sentence for his actions.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Arijirija says:

I’m sure there’s something about it in some ancient documents – ah, yes, have it here, US Declaration of Independence, presenting accusations of misconduct against the administration of King George of England in the 13 Colonies:
“For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:”
“He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.”

Murdering your fellow citizen, whether in uniform or not, while serving in a public office such as a Police Department, should warrant more than a wet bus ticket slap on the wrist or a pat on the backside.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

Given that lying about a warrant not only breaks the entire reason to have them as a limitation in the law but can, as this case shows be literally a matter of life and death for the person listed on them submitting a fraudulent warrant application should carry heavy penalties at the base level, penalties which should only increase based upon the harm and right violations that result from them.

Running with that idea in this case on top of whatever the base penalty would be since someone died as a result every officer involved should be on the hook for manslaughter charges at a minimum.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The police couldn’t be certain exactly where the drug dealer was located at any given time. Jamarcus Glover was using Taylor’s residence as a stash house, which is where the money is kept. Meanwhile, he was selling out of a trap house, which was the residence 10 miles away. If anyone raids the trap house, be it crooks or police, they’ll only find a minimal amount of money and drugs. The cops were raiding the correct address.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
nasch (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Jamarcus Glover was using Taylor’s residence as a stash house, which is where the money is kept.

“Among other things, the affidavit falsely claimed that officers had verified that the target of the alleged drug trafficking operation had received packages at Ms. Taylor’s address. In fact, Defendants Jaynes and Goodlett knew that was not true.”

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

The police couldn’t be certain exactly where the drug dealer was located at any given time.

That’s a bit funny, given that surveillance was how they supposedly knew what was allegedly going on in the first place.

Jamarcus Glover was using Taylor’s residence as a stash house, which is where the money is kept.

Interesting observation given no money was found at Taylor’s residence.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

genghis_uk (profile) says:

No-Knock what's the point?

I can never work out why no-knock warrants are ever justified.

If the occupants have so little evidence that it can be flushed away in seconds, they are not really the level of ‘dealer’ that the police should be chasing. That sounds like personal use so a raid is over the top.
If the occupant has a stockpile, then they are not going to get rid of it quickly and there will be plenty of evidence left when the police have destroyed the door/windows/walls to get in after announcing

Coyne Tibbets (profile) says:

Re: Actually wasn't a no-knock

Actually, as noted in some of the news and in the Wikipdia article, the paucity of the evidence had caused the magistrate to change the warrant to knock and announce.

They knocked all right, with a battering ram. They claimed they announced, as they always do in these cases, but 11 witnesses said they did not. (There was one witness that said they did, according to the cops, but he later denied it.)

So, in addition to the other problems, it appears the cops did a no-knock without a no-knock warrant.

Arijirija says:

Re: Re:

The one thing a kidnap/hostage situation doesn’t have, is uncertainty about precisely what is going on. A warrant is supposed to be used to search for information, data, clues, about something which the police allege is happening or has happened at that location, or in relation to something alleged to happen etc elsewhere.

A kidnap/hostage situation is one where negotiators should be used, at least at the start. Later, if things spiral out of control, you send in the heavies. But that situation is where you’re dealing with some known quantities, such as the hostage taker being armed, the hostages not. You don’t need a warrant to find that out.

MightyMetricBatman says:

Re:

In addition, the January 6th cases are taking up a lot more time than the average misdemeanor. The defendants believe in the their own righteousness of their cause and thus pleading at a much lower rate than normal.

So, more trials, in an already snarled and slow system. Not that it isn’t their right to do so. Just they shouldn’t expect a sentencing discount for making the DOJ do the extra work.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The problem with Jan 6 Is that there were three different groups.

The first and largest, in the thousand, are the angry but generally peaceful protestors who never crossed the barricades. Didn’t break any laws.

The second are the many dozens who entered the ‘rotunda’ area, with permission. Who here, broke no law willingly. They went where they were told they could, and stayed where they were told to stay

The third, and these are the real (and only) problem, are so-called patriots who violently stormed, read raided, the capital; criminals from start to finish.

The last group believe they were doing their patriotic duty, wrongly. Holding the words of Franklin and Jefferson in hand. Some self decided glorious revolution to overthrow a tyrant legislature. So of course they all plead out. They believe they’re right.

The second group, however, is being swept up with the first. And here, it is far more difficult. With some going free and some serving time. The question here is: does acting on permission of authority absolve when the authority did not have standing to grant.

Rocky says:

Re: Re: Re:3

Yeah, you know – walking through smashed doors and windows should give any person with some capacity of thought an inkling that perhaps they shouldn’t be there regardless of what any outnumbered officers said or did to avoid escalating an situation where other officers had been already beaten badly.

Yes your honor, some other people had already broken into the house and raped her friends but she said it was okay for us to gangbang her so it can’t be rape.

Fuck you your fascist apologist.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:4

The doors weren’t smashed. One officer opens them, another held them open. With a brief discussion between officers and the man dressed like a Shaman, they were allowed to enter. Told where to stay. And didn’t violate those rules.
When told to leave some time later, they did so orderly.

Nobody is denying there was a small group of… insurrectionists. They are totally separate from the other two groups.

Much like the treasonous terrorists who burned a federal courthouse were a separate group of people from the rest of the BLM protestors.

I’m not apologising for anyone. I refuse to act like the talking heads on cable news that want to ignore the separation between the peaceful protestors and the criminals.

No matter what they’re protesting.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:6

Follow the thread, Rocky (if you can, for many threading is broke )

Those that entered the capital rotunda, including the shaman guy, were allowed in through the, unbroken, doors by a pair of officers.

Nowhere, now, or before, did I deny perpetrators of violence. In fact, a f while before the officers allowed this group in, an officer was attacked outside those doors.
But hey **don’t stop the video at the man punching the cop in the back*!!
4 protesters grab the attacker, throw him off the cop with force. Drag him away, and get a few good licks in on the fuck. He was arrested at the time. To mild cheers.

The recording of the conversation between the shaman and the police officers who let them in is online.
So is the call to vacate the entry and the peaceful exit by those there.

The republicans spent years talking about the pockets of violence (Chicago and Seattle did have billions+ in damages, TBH) at BLM protests. Dems refusing to recognise any of it.
Now we have the opposite. Dems focused on a few dozen out of many many thousands.

Rocky says:

Re: Re: Re:7

Those that entered the capital rotunda

They had to fucking walk through overthrown barricades, broken down doors and windows to get to the fucking rotunda. And they apparently also “missed” that the Capitol Police was attacked in the process of smashing those things to gain access. I think every little stupid asshole who walked into the Capitol that day should be thrown in jail for the simple reason that just their presence was an affront to the democratic process.

The republicans spent years talking about the pockets of violence (Chicago and Seattle did have billions+ in damages, TBH) at BLM protests. Dems refusing to recognise any of it. Now we have the opposite. Dems focused on a few dozen out of many many thousands.

And there it is, another of your lame-ass excuses for defending the indefensible.

Mark my words, stupid people like you are the reason the US is tearing itself apart. I do hope you will like the dystopia you are helping to create.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:10

The video has been verified, but since you don’t like the post:

Well, to start with. Here’s the POLICE opening the Nara case. Not some big storming over
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9z7WGHdmBo

Here at a different entry way angle from the one posted by the NYP:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiF4EIReuY4

Police open the doors and lead them in. Look, peaceful… walking, not storming.

The point being more than one group! Some broke the law. Most, did not.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

migi (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

You’re mistaken, the second group and anyone else who crossed the police barriers around the Capitol complex broke the law, they trespassed. The Capitol is secured 24 hrs a day by it’s own police force for a reason, furthermore on Jan 6th both the VP and VP elect were in the building, which makes it a restricted building under the law.

Officers could not give people permission for people to enter, they did not have the authority. If they did say that people had permission, it was invalid for the same reason that you might give someone your wallet if their friend is holding a knife.

Of course there is a big difference between someone who assaulted LEOs vs someone who meekly wandered around. It would probably be a waste of time and resources to track down and prosecute every last person who only trespassed. But claiming the trespassers haven’t committed any crimes is completely incorrect.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

No, I’m not.

Because I didn’t say they were innocent of criminal activity.

My exact quote: “Who here, broke no law willingly.”

I’ve said in posts for months they are clearly guilty of trespassing. But they are an entirely separate group, in a different area, with different motivations.
Ignorance is not a pass to the law. That they were unaware the officers were incapable of legally waiving regulations does not make them any less guilty!
But it also doesn’t factually make them part of an entirely separate group.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Coyne Tibbets (profile) says:

Was the Breonna Taylor raid a hit?

The only officer to enter at the start of the raid was Mattingly, who fired six shots. Five or six shots hit Breonna Taylor, one of which (Cosgrove’s) killed her.

There’s quite a singular focus on shooting Breonna, despite the fact that Kenneth Walker had fired at the police. They only hit Walker once, out of thirty-two shots.

Was it Mattingly who shot Breonna? Or was she shot during the “second wave” of fire, which occurred 68 seconds after the first wave?

Whichever, it seems that there was a singular focus on shooting Breonna Taylor.

Prior to that, there had been a singular focus on justifying a no-knock warrant for the raid, involving multiple outright lies and deceptions.

Then, even though they got a no-knock, the orders were changed to knock and announce. But entry apparently still operated as a no-knock.

Taken in toto, to my mind at least, this all suggests that there was a singular purpose for this raid: The death of Breonna Taylor.

Did someone want her dead? Was the raid actually a hit?

nasch (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Yes, they lied, but why did they lie in this fashion? If they knew there were no drug dealers at this address, why did they go to the trouble of getting an arrest warrant there? Since the correct house was 10 miles away it wasn’t a matter of transposing the house number digits. It paints a picture of intentionally breaking into this specific house for… some reason.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

If they knew there were no drug dealers at this address, why did they go to the trouble of getting an arrest warrant there?

They didn’t know where the dealer would be at any given time, nor could they be certain where the drugs or money would be located. When a dealer is running trap houses and a stash house, they police try to get a warrant for all the locations.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

They didn’t know where the dealer would be at any given time, nor could they be certain where the drugs or money would be located.

Admitting after raiding the wrong house that you really didn’t know if the suspect, the drugs, or the money were there isn’t a good look.

LostInLoDOS (profile) says:

Once again, just bad

Someone needs to train these idiots.
How do you fire 32 shots and NOT hit your target.

The trained armed individual is woke. In a fit of an invasion, fires a single warning shot, and it falls on target.
The invading horde fires 32 shots, misses the target, and kills an innocent bystander.

These idiots are lucky they don’t depend on their service weapons for food. They’d all starve to death!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...