Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the grapevine dept
This week, our first place winner on the insightful side is That One Guy with a comment about how Murdoch-pushed social media news taxes in some countries have made Facebook lose interest in news:
Appeasement doesn’t work? What a surprise
Give an inch and they demanded a mile, who could have seen that coming from an industry that thinks they are owed money from the people sending traffic to them for free?
Nice that Facebook at lease might have caught on that no amount of money will ever be enough for the parasitic publishers, I look forward to future articles where they’ll be screaming about how Facebook removing any links to their stuff is an abuse of power and the government needs to step in and force them to carry and pay for news.
In second place, it’s Keroberos with a comment about the moral panic study showing Instagram makes some teenagers feel worse about themselves:
That chart is meaningless. Instagram makes some teens feel worse about themselves. Compared to what? I’d be willing to bet that if you asked that same question of teens (or anyone, for that matter), but changed the word “Instagram” with any other place where they might interact with others (school, home, work, the mall, a party, just about anywhere), you’d get almost identical numbers. About half would say it had no effect, about a quarter would say it had a positive effect, and about a quarter would say it was negative. That chart has some variation, but for the most part looks like an almost normal distribution and actually skewed towards the positive instead of the negative.
For editor’s choice on the insightful side, we’ve got two more comments about the social media news taxes. First, it’s one more from That One Guy, raising a key point about these schemes:
And that is why the larger publishers have tried to make it legally impossible to not charge money for links with laws like this, because they know the smaller outlets will make clear that people can link to them for nothing and completely undermine the parasites trying to demand money.
Next, it’s That Anonymous Coward with a general comment about the situation:
You needed us more than we needed you…
(shamelessly stolen I forget where and when but this sort of proves this idea has always been with us)
Hey, this golden egg is awesome.
But I bet if we cut the goose open, we could get a second golden egg, and we wouldn’t have to wait for tomorrow.
Frankly, I can’t see any downsides to this plan, and I suggest we implement it immediately.
Gentlemen, sharpen your axes.
Over on the funny side, our first place winner is jojo_36 with another comment about the social media moral panic and the Texas rep who has promised a bill to ban teens from the services:
Texas proposes another Social Media Law:
Techdirt: “Ah shit, here we go again.”
In second place, it’s z! with a comment about Elon Musk trying to get out of the Twitter deal:
What happens next?
We all get a double popcorn and set back to watch.
For editor’s choice on the funny side, we start out with kvh and one more comment about the social media panic:
I assume when Texans here one of their politicians planning on banning minors from social media they think he’s planning on banning minorities from social media.
Finally, it’s an anonymous comment about Ben Smith’s Semafor launch event and his disastrous interview with Tucker Carlson:
Glad we got to hear Tucker’s perspective. He just doesn’t have a platform of his own where he gets to say whatever bullshit comes to his mind.
That’s all for this week, folks!


Comments on “Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt”
really?
“Glad we got to hear Tucker’s perspective. He just doesn’t have a platform of his own where he gets to say whatever bullshit comes to his mind.”
Do you really think he has a mind? He dont mind, and we dont care.
Re:
In my experience, the mind is the first thing to go once someone starts experiencing any kind of radical polarization. Political, religious, scientific, doesn’t matter.
They literally have topics they aren’t allowed to think rationally about.
The thing is though, your own statements make it clear you’re pretty polarized yourself.
Re: Re:
The thing is though, your own statements make it clear you’re pretty polarized yourself.
Links.
Re: Re: Re:
If you click the (profile) link next to ECA’s name, it will take you to a list of his comments. Your source trolling remains terrible.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Your source trolling remains terrible.
Every accusation a confession.
Re: Re: Re:3
Look, we get it, you’re angry and upset that a response to your Arthur Conan Doyle impersonation got voted insightful and your constant pissing and moaning about projection didn’t.
Get over yourself.
Re: Re: Re:4
Look, we get it. You can’t tell the difference between one individual and another, and your constant bluster and lies about it doesn’t change that.
Get over yourself.
Re: Re: Re:5
There’s been only one sad sack whining about reading comprehension and projection and bullying and trolling over multiple articles over the last few weeks.
Re: Re: Re:6
Projected the troll.
Re: Re: Re:6
There’s been multiple sad sacks making false accusations of whining about reading comprehension and projection and bullying and trolling over multiple articles over the last few weeks, and you can see one of them in the mirror.
Re: Re: Re:7
Five minutes timestamp difference. Man, it’s like you’re not even trying to be subtle.
Re: Re: Re:2
Notice how this AC seems to have an apparent allergy to facts?
They’ve never used one themselves, and they have violent reactioms to people that use them, as we see demomstrated above.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3
Notice how this Techdirt regular seems to have an apparent allergy to facts?
*They’ve never used one themselves, and they have violent reactioms to people that use them, as we see amply demomstrated here as well as above.
Re: Re: Re:4
Oh goody! I get to engage an AC who outed his prior stupidity. (im gonna assume the various AC’s are one person, and that person is you, for the framing of this post. In the event you are a different AC, That does not change the conclusions of the analysis below)
your original statement:
Tooms’ pointing out the error in your statement:
Your attempt to dispute Tooms’ claim:>You’re the one lying, actually. All I said was the website couldn’t be sued for it. I never said or even implied that the rights holder couldn’t go after the actual infringer. You made that leap all on your own, destroying your argument with a logical fallacy.
You have strawmanned what is being said.
You claimed that section 230 could be asserted against copyright. It can not. The protections against litigation provided by Section 230 do not apply to Intellectual property cases. This is why Viacom v Youtube centered around the question of ‘red flag knowledge’ and safe harbors – copyright is under its own law, the DMCA. the DMCA does provide a similar legal protection as section 230 – the safe harbor provisions. its not as strong or robust, but they are how you get 230-lite protections.
No one is claiming that News Corp couldn’t sue a user who posts an entire article in a facebook post. We are claiming that Newscorp could, in the case of copyright infringement, also sue facebook.
Lets say News Corp issued a DMCA takedown over user generated content and Facebook refused, losing DMCA protection. When News Corp sues, the question is could Facebook claim section 230 to get the lawsuit dismissed? No. Because Section 230 protections do not apply to intellectual property. When you say “All I said was the website couldn’t be sued for it.”, you are lying, because explicitly, the website could be sued for it.
Tooms was 100% in the right on that one.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:5
Because copyright infringement is always a federal criminal case? You and Tooms1275 are 100% in the wrong on this one, but what else can be expected from trolling bullies?
Re: Re: Re:6
What’s this got to do with whether or not a site can be sued or not? But it’s an interesting point you bring up, because by all appearances, one thing that plaintiffs in copyright infringement cases absolutely want to avoid is having their case treated as a criminal case. Because the moment it gets dragged to the criminal courts they’ll have to contend with the fact that their IP address evidence isn’t worth the toilet paper it’s written on.
Re: Re: Re:5
I have a question: if Section 230 doesn’t apply to cases of copyright infringement because they’re always federal, then why did the Texas Supreme Court preside over one last year? Doesn’t this prove that Section 230 therefore does apply to at least some copyright cases?
Re: Re: Re:6
Considering that the link you gave also mentioned that the petition was denied as of March 21st 2022… no.
Re: Re: Re:7
Considering that the petition was considered in civil court before ultimately being denied the answer is actually yes, but I wouldn’t expect a hanger on like you to get that.
Re: Re: Re:8
Courts consider matters all the time to decide whether a particular law is relevant or not, so just because it got to court does not mean that a particular law applies to a case.
Re: Re: Re:9
Said somebody without full understanding of the law.
Re: Re: Re:10
Said the poster who claimed that Techdirt set the foundation for Prenda Law.
Re: Re: Re:4
Thank you for providing yet more evidence proving absolutely correct my observation of your blindly copypasting things you lack the ability to comprehend the context of.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:5
Every accusation a confession.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:5
Said the projecting hanger on.
Re: Re: Re:5
Said the specialist in blindly copypasting.
Re: Re: Re:5
Said the lying hanger on.
Re: Re: Re:6
Champ, maybe wait for longer than four minutes between every repeated jab at projection or reading comprehension or hypocrisy. You’re going to strain what limited faculties you have otherwise.
Re: Re: Re:7
Projected the lying hanger on.
Re: Re: Re:8
You can whine about it all you want, but the timestamps don’t lie.
Re: Re: Re:9
Timestamps prove nothing more than both comments being posted around the same time, nothing else. Not that I’d expect a lying hanger on like you to understand a concept as complicated as evidentiary value.
Re: Re: Re:10
Add to the substantial similarity of the comments, and you’ve got a pattern. I just find it funny as hell that all this happened because you had a shitfit when Bayside Advisory was referred to as “copyright’s law best and brightest” and you started simping harder than a Belle Delphine fanboy.
Re: Re: Re:4
Damn that must have stung to bring up that beating you took in that thread.
Oh well no one cares but you.
Re: Re: Re:5
If you’re looking for a place to stay, you can live rent-free in AC’s head by doing nothing more than debunking one of their evidence-free lies. I’ve been staying there since at least the time I comprehe sovely debunked his lie that Texas’s Republicans didn’t officially declare that when they say “Conservative viewpoints” they mean “Holocaust denial, vaccine disinformation, and terrorism.” Stephen’s been resident for even longer, and looks like James is our newest neighbor.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
If you’re looking for a place to stay, you can live rent-free in AC’s head by doing nothing more than debunking one of their evidence-free lies.
Projected the lying hanger on.
I’ve been staying there since at least the time I comprehe sovely debunked his lie that Texas’s Republicans didn’t officially declare that when they say “Conservative viewpoints” they mean “Holocaust denial, vaccine disinformation, and terrorism.”
Links.
Stephen’s been resident for even longer, and looks like James is our newest neighbor.
And yet more lies for which there is no evidence, thus my earlier accusation of projection.
Re: Re: Re:7
Why yes, all your lies about projection have thus far been made without a scrap of evidence.
Re: Re: Re:8
Projected the troll.
Re: Re: Re:7
Since I’ve never once made an observation that wasn’t based on the evidence: Here, you can have my comment containing all the original primary sources I provided to the previous bad-faith demand for them, that the AC troll who has only ever deliberately lied about me conspicuously ignored:
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/02/11/penguin-random-house-demands-removal-maus-digital-library-because-book-is-popular-again/#comment-1815405
Re: Re: Re:8
So a comment posted on this site over three months before I began visiting it is “conspicuous ignorance” of that comment? And then you have the cheek to accuse me of illiteracy?
Re: Re: Re:9
If you only started visiting that recently, why bend over backwards this much just to defend other anonymous nobodies on the Internet?
Re: Re: Re:7
All you prove with that claim is that you’re not above gaslighting about the contents of the very thread you’re trolling.
Just because you have an attention span shorter than planck time, doesn’t mean everybody else who’s capable of reading will have forgotten your trolling of James for debunking your lies just a handful of posts above.
Re: Re: Re:8
All you prove with that claim is that you’re not above gaslighting about the contents of the very thread I’m trolling.
Thank you for the admission. (Just had to fix one word to make it fully accurate.)
Re: Re: Re:9
Thanks for yet another example proving, as always, that I’m 100% correct.
Re: Re: Re:8
All you prove with that claim is that you’re not above gaslighting about the contents of the very thread you’re trolling.
Said the real troll, accusing others of illiteracy before proving his own.
Re: Re: Re:6
And yet more assertions for which there is no evidence, thus my earlier accusation of projection.
Re: Re: Re:5
Damn that must have stung to bring up that beating you took in that thread.
Said the lying, evidenceless hanger on.
Re: Re: Re:6
Shit, broski, you make John Smith look rational.
Re: always interesting to see the replies
In a long life Iv learned many things, including abit of philosophy.
The logic of the mind is very simple, and simple answers are easier to accept then any others.
The smartest persons, tend to be Quiet and Listen. Make no opinion until you understand All sides.
Always give doubt to your veracity and knowledge, but as soon as you open your mouth, all is gone.
When I was Young, I heard all these strange bad comments about others Like rag head, and BLANK, AND BLANK and water melon and Chicken.
I went and looked up these strange comments and Found either reasons WHY others did things different, or the comments were lies, Or that I LIKED CHICKEN AND WATERMELON ALSO.
Teachers tried to teach us to read between the lines, and I only learned 1 thing about it, you MUST know Everything about a situation BEFORE you can read between the lines. Thats isnt easy.
I was raised without Bias, I try to find and define WHAT the meaning of a Crass connotation is. What a person means. then I TRY to find out HOW they got that idea/concept, meaning.
90% of the time, it was someone else’s Comment. from TV, Newspapers, from Another that didnt know better.
Facebook does not want to deal with greedy big corporations who want to break the Web by charging for the honor of sending customers to outside websites , once you pay one cartel you. Ll have to deal with them in many country’s, unfortunately there’s no genius like Steve Jobs around to deal with greedy publishers like he dragged the music industry into the digital age by launchi
The iTunes , the ipod etc
Of course it can afford to drop all news from fb Australia when it has meta Instagram and billions in advertising deals around the world
Re:
If Steve Jobs was such a genius, why didn’t he know that a vegan diet doesn’t treat pancreatic cancer anywhere near as effectively as chemotherapy?
Re: Re:
Id agree giving Jobs the credit on music breakthroughs is a stretch. That said, I’d agree he was a marketing genius. And from there I can also answer your question. He was a genius at marketing. Not medical science. Nor was he immune to the marketing of other charismatic figures.
Re: Re: Re:
Walter Isaacson, biographer of many well-known geniuses, explains that although high intelligence may be a prerequisite, the most common trait that actually defines a genius may be the extraordinary ability to apply creativity and imaginative thinking to almost any situation.
Source.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
You mean like pushing meshpage.org to every situation?
Re: Re: Re:3
That’s the polar opposite.
Re: Re: Re:2
I’d point out that ignoring mainstream science and instead pursuing quack theories of naturopathy would qualify as both ‘creative’ and ‘imaginative’. It was a willingness to find creative and imaginative solutions to his cancer that to his susceptibility to the quackery that pervades some forms of veganism.
I’d also like some evidence that Issacson’s perspective on genius informs the definition used by the AC, or myself.
Merriam-Webster: Genius Defninition 5. A single strongly marked capacity or aptitude.
That seems to entirely fit my use case of “Marketing Genius”.
Re: Re: Re:3
Read again:
…the most common trait that actually defines a genius may be the extraordinary ability to apply creativity and imaginative thinking to almost any situation.
In other words, just short of gifted.
Re: Re: Re:4
Read again:
I posed that such thinking is a double edged sword. Medical Researchers thinking creatively and imaginatively can come up with new ideas that can be refined into revolutionary treatments. Patients with very deadly, low-survival-odds forms of cancer with limited time thinking creatively and imaginatively can delude themselves into believing any matter of quackery. I than made my more cogent point that Issacson’s definition is not the sole defninition, as Merriam Websters definition 5a shows. (Issacson’s definition might fit within the 5c definition, but does not appear to be the most common use)
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:5
So you’re a troll that believes your view is correct over and above a reputable source saying otherwise. Good to know.
Re: Re: Re:6
… Projects the AC troll who believes his baseless delusions about Section 230 are more correct than the actual text of the law itself.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:7
*Projects the regular troll who believes his baseless delusions about others’ identities are more correct than objective reality itself.
Re: Re: Re:8 Sorry that should be mr ms or they I’m rubber
Oh look it’s Mr “I’m rubber your glue” back to get made fun fir being terminally unimaginative and cry about it, again.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:9
At least I can spell correctly. It’s better to be falsely accused of being “terminally unimaginative and crying about it” than to not even know how to right-click red-flagged words on my PC.
Re: Re: Re:10
Not surprising that AC, the biggest hypocrite in any thread where Phil is absent, would lie about being attacked for a typo, and then attack others for their actual typos. (not to mention hallucinate up nonexistent features of the innocent victim’s system.)
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:11
And the real troll comes back with more false accusations of what he thinks I said, unable to provide any evidence as usual.
Re: Re: Re:12
And that individual can be seen only in your bathroom mirror.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:13
Projectedthe hallucinating troll.
Re: Re: Re:13
Projectedthe regular troll.
Re: Re: Re:10 Not everyone needs a desktop PC to make fun of you
When all you can do is go after a single typo, you know you’ve lost.
Re: Re: Re:11
Your “single” typo, highlighted:
Oh look it’s Mr “I’m rubber your glue” back to get made fun fir being terminally unimaginative and cry about it, again.
Not only that, but you missed out three commas as well as having an unnecessary one. So not only can’t you spell or punctuate correctly, you can’t count either.
Re: Re: Re:6
…to almost any situation
Which logically means that in some instances their imagination and creativity leads them down the wrong path – which is exactly what James elucidated to. You are of course free to point out where Isaacson said that no “gifted individual” have ever goofed up in their thinking.
One would think anyone possessing a modicum of reasoning skills would have realized the above which leads me to believe it is something you lack.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:7
One would think anyone possessing a modicum of reasoning skills would have realized the above which leads me to believe it is something you lack.
The light of your projection is blinding.
Re: Re: Re:8
You are one sad simpleton of a troll, you only manage to repeat the same stupid one liners. Perhaps when you grow up you’ll gain some wisdom and wit but everything so far points to that you’ll still be a stupid little sack of shit.
You should try rolling your face all over the keyboard, it would most certainly be an improvement over your current low IQ comments.
Now, let us see if you manage to scrape together some kind of response that aren’t entirely stupid…
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:9
Why are you talking about yourself like that? Self-flagellation is so medieval.
Re: Re: Re:10
Said copyright law’s best and brightest.
Re: Re: Re:11
When others talk to themselves, we say they’re insane. You, on the other hand, are just pathetic.
Re: Re: Re:12
Being a simp for Bayside Advisory is really scraping the bottom of the barrel for you, isn’t it?
Re: Re: Re:13
I’m going to fuck you up the ass with an SMG, Rocky.
Re: Re: Re:14
Copyright maximalists like you eventually out yourselves like the sociopathic, scumsucking, bottom-feeding filth you always have been.
Re: Re: Re:9
You should try rolling your face all over the keyboard, it would most certainly be an improvement over your current low IQ comments.
Why are you talking about yourself like that? Self-flagellation is so medieval.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Write Accounting Assignment with the help of experts
Assignment Help Lite is the perfect accounting assignment help provider in Canada for someone who has no time. You can get the best certified and professional accounting assignment helper with assignments help lite.