Yes, he did, just not successfully, or at least not competently. Whereas Biden did, and it’s going to hurt him when it comes to appealing to younger voters. The youth don’t approve of his polices in the Israel-Palestine war, so how do you think they’ll react to when they learn that Biden successfully passed a potential ban towards TikTok, which is used by that generation overwhelmingly?
I do hope Biden still try to eke out a win in spite of this blunder. I just do not understand why he’s making this election more difficult for himself.
Just. Don’t. Focus. On. Section. 2. 30…
…and actually focus on the crimes committed on the web and give harsher penalties for them. It’s not that hard. This is like in order to stop theft in a store is to close that store. Just make the penalties for the crime just harsher.
Uhhh, the protests weren’t exactly aimed towards Hollywood. It was more so on the legislators that tried rushing through SOPA. But once the Blackout happened, that gave legislators extreme cold feet and its momentum was all but sapped. If something like SOPA can be stopped before, it can be stopped again.
The only silver lining is that there hasn’t been anything specifically SOPA-related released… yet. It’ll be a while until we heard more of this “plan.” Until then, keep an eye open.
The thing about YouTube is that it’s not the website that’s committing it, it’s its users that do. And even most of the time, copyright strikes are usually false as a result of YouTube’s copyright detection algorithms having a tendency to not recognize the nuisances of fair use and/or expression.
The issue with SOPA wasn’t that it ensured that copyright issues on platforms have to be blocked, it insured that entire websites have to be blocked. That’s like saying YouTube should be blocked because of its copyright infringements. It was a case of copyright maximalism then and it’s a case of copyright maximalism now. And it’s extremely disappointing that Hollywood has learned nothing.
What’s particularly baffling and ironic about Hillary’s statements is that her Bill Clinton’s administration was the one that created Section 230 in the first place. So, she is actively trying to undermine not just the greatest innovative transformation of the internet, but her own husband’s legacy.
To quote South Park, “GET OUT OF YOUR OWN WAY!”
Does… does he not know that some of those users of 25,000 engagements (whatever that means) are protesters, activists, journalists, people of minorities, politicians, LGBTQ people, and many, many other communities? Does he even know that doxxing is a thing? Doesn’t he know that that is extremely dangerous? Mr. Padilla is spearheading a bill that would coerce online companies to essentially spy on these individuals against their consent. That is messed up.
Likewise, I also want Biden to win. But I do not understand why he’s making this election way harder than it should be.
Yes, he did, just not successfully, or at least not competently. Whereas Biden did, and it’s going to hurt him when it comes to appealing to younger voters. The youth don’t approve of his polices in the Israel-Palestine war, so how do you think they’ll react to when they learn that Biden successfully passed a potential ban towards TikTok, which is used by that generation overwhelmingly? I do hope Biden still try to eke out a win in spite of this blunder. I just do not understand why he’s making this election more difficult for himself.
P.S. I’m still going to vote for Biden, it won’t be because I like him, it’s in spite of Trump.
You know for someone who is trying to be a more appealing alternative to Trump, Biden is doing a great job making Trump a more appealing option.
Here’s an idea for congressmen…
Just. Don’t. Focus. On. Section. 2. 30… …and actually focus on the crimes committed on the web and give harsher penalties for them. It’s not that hard. This is like in order to stop theft in a store is to close that store. Just make the penalties for the crime just harsher.
Uhhh, the protests weren’t exactly aimed towards Hollywood. It was more so on the legislators that tried rushing through SOPA. But once the Blackout happened, that gave legislators extreme cold feet and its momentum was all but sapped. If something like SOPA can be stopped before, it can be stopped again. The only silver lining is that there hasn’t been anything specifically SOPA-related released… yet. It’ll be a while until we heard more of this “plan.” Until then, keep an eye open.
The thing about YouTube is that it’s not the website that’s committing it, it’s its users that do. And even most of the time, copyright strikes are usually false as a result of YouTube’s copyright detection algorithms having a tendency to not recognize the nuisances of fair use and/or expression.
He bravely ran away…
The issue with SOPA wasn’t that it ensured that copyright issues on platforms have to be blocked, it insured that entire websites have to be blocked. That’s like saying YouTube should be blocked because of its copyright infringements. It was a case of copyright maximalism then and it’s a case of copyright maximalism now. And it’s extremely disappointing that Hollywood has learned nothing.
It’s been 12 years and Hollywood has learned nothing. Best to keep an eye open.
There’s a difference between disagreeing with your spouse and undercutting your spouse’s greatest accomplishment because… FOMO?
Once, again… ITS UNDER THE SAUCE.
What’s particularly baffling and ironic about Hillary’s statements is that her Bill Clinton’s administration was the one that created Section 230 in the first place. So, she is actively trying to undermine not just the greatest innovative transformation of the internet, but her own husband’s legacy. To quote South Park, “GET OUT OF YOUR OWN WAY!”
Doesn’t really matter if it’s left or right-wing, a bad idea is still a bad idea.
Mr. Padilla, I have a question…
Does… does he not know that some of those users of 25,000 engagements (whatever that means) are protesters, activists, journalists, people of minorities, politicians, LGBTQ people, and many, many other communities? Does he even know that doxxing is a thing? Doesn’t he know that that is extremely dangerous? Mr. Padilla is spearheading a bill that would coerce online companies to essentially spy on these individuals against their consent. That is messed up.
I dunno, sounds like you’re doing that, McCarthyist.
Judge: “Now 68 days of pole camera surveillance is A-okay. But 69 days… oooh! Now that is pushing it!”
On the second thought, let’s not go to Las Vegas. Tis a silly place.
So a Dunt.
Durbin to rename his committee board to the “Committee of Echo Chambers.”
Mate, we just answered you. Quit asking this question or we’ll label you as spam.