White Deputies Search Bus Full Of Black College Students Just Because, Lie About It Later

from the unbroken-streak-of-subjugation-continues-into-2022 dept

Will racism ever be over in the United States? Nah. We’re just too damn good at it.

Sheriff’s deputies in Georgia stopped a bus carrying a mostly Black women’s lacrosse team under the apparent assumption there was marijuana on board, and the players and their coaches were humiliated and angered by the experience.

The Delaware State University team was stopped April 20 in Liberty County on their way home from playing a game at Stetson University in Florida, and bus driver Tim Jones said he was initially told the stop was for a lane violation — but a video taken by one of the players shows a search for drugs, reported USA Today.

It was a pretextual stop, because of course it was. How many traffic stops are truly for their intended purpose? Not many. And this pretext somehow gave the deputies permission to board the bus and search everyone, despite the stated violation being something only the driver should have had to deal with.

Once aboard, the deputies got straight to the real point of the stop — something that’s definitely not going to help them survive the inevitable lawsuit(s). Law of the land — at least since the Supreme Court’s Rodriguez decision — is that a stop can only last as long as its takes to attend to the purpose of the stop. In this case, it was supposedly a lane violation. But these deputies immediately made the stop about something else. And that’s unconstitutional.

“If there is anything in y’all’s luggage, we’re probably gonna find it, okay?” an officer says in the video recorded by player Saniya Craft. “I’m not looking for a little bit of marijuana, but I’m pretty sure you guys’ chaperones are probably going to be disappointed in you if we find any.”

“If there is something in there that’s questionable,” the deputy adds on the video, “please tell me now, because if we find it — guess what? We’re not going to be able to help you.”

Here’s that recording:

This decision to turn a routine traffic stop into an all-hands search for drugs the deputies had no reasonable suspicion to believe they’d find on the bus definitely violates the tenets of the Rodriguez decision. According to a student’s account, this was only the beginning. Luggage contents were tossed, aided and abetted by other deputies who arrived at the scene of the crime, which was [rereads opening paragraphs] an alleged “lane violation.”

The officers instructed Mr. Jones to open the bus trunk, as they proceeded to go through the ladies personal belongings. Everyone was confused as to why they were looking through the luggage, when there was no probable cause. The team members were in shock, as they witnessed the officers rambling through their bags. They brought the K-9 dog out to sniff their luggage. The cops began tossing underwear and other feminine products, in an attempt to locate narcotics.

Every time the students turned their heads, more officers appeared at the scene. The cops kept doubling, as they went from two to six officers. They checked bags for 20 minutes, then explained it was necessary, in case of child trafficking or drugs. 

The sheriff’s office capped off this mass of rights violations by lying about it. Here’s what Liberty County (GA) Sheriff William Bowman said about the purported “lane violation” stop when the media began asking questions:

Bowman addressed the issue on Tuesday afternoon, and said that “no personal items on the bus or persons were searched.”

Wait what?

This is a screenshot taken from footage captured by one of the deputies’ own body cameras. That looks like a luggage search to me. Here’s the full recording:

Sheriff William Bowman, who is black, offered no explanation for his statement, which was clearly contradicted by body cam video obtained by the Wilmington News Journal. He had no excuse for saying what he did because his statement to the press made it clear he had reviewed the footage before he decided to lie about it (or simply parrot his deputies’ lies about what had occurred).

He said after speaking with deputies and reviewing video and other aspects of the incident, he does “not believe any racial profiling took place.”

That statement is every bit as stupid as his claim no luggage was searched. It sure looks like racial profiling and Sheriff Bowman’s follow-up doesn’t alter this appearance.

“Before entering the motorcoach, the deputies were not aware that this school was historically Black or aware of the race or the occupants due to the height of the vehicle and tint of the windows,” Bowman said.

Sure, but once they were inside, the deputies could see the racial makeup of the students on the bus, and that appears to have motivated their decision to escalate this from a routine traffic stop to 30+ minutes of continuous rights violations. And they could have made this decision to perform a stop because they knew the driver was black. The windows surrounding the bus driver are clearly untinted.

To pretend this isn’t exactly what it looks like is desperation. The sheriff has already been caught in one lie. He shouldn’t make this worse by pretending this was a good stop that contained no misconduct and does not contain a racial angle.

And, in the end, nothing happened but a bunch of apparent racism. The driver was not cited. No illegal contraband was found. A bunch of students from a historically black college were treated like suspected criminals for no other reason than the deputies could. All the sheriff’s department gets out this abuse of power is the opportunity to be named in a bunch of civil rights lawsuits.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “White Deputies Search Bus Full Of Black College Students Just Because, Lie About It Later”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
47 Comments
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

'The racial component was a coincidence, the harassment intentional'

‘It wasn’t a racially-motivated excuse to harass a bunch of black students, it was a baseless fishing expedition to harass a bunch of people and it was just a coincidence that they were all black’ does not make for the excuse the lying sheriff might think it does.

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: 9,000 pounds of 18 gage steel

Quakers have a 300+ year history, for some reason we persist where almost all “leftest” movements in the last 400 years have perished:(
After the January insurrection, I bought 350 3’x3′ shelves at a SpaceX auction and stacked them in the front of the Meetinghouse. The cedar shiplap is so dry from water-based paint that a member accidently stuck a broom handle through an exterior wall.

Paul B says:

Re: Re:

I wish it worked that way, This is forever an arms race to have an outgroup to blame for your problems that is to weak to stand up for itself.

If, for example, all dark skinned people left, then Jews, or Immigrants, or any number of other groups would be blamed and set up as the new outgroup. This will never end because its so easy to do.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Yes, anytime you stop black people it MUST be racism. They can’t just be bad cops, right? What, is the black sheriff a white supremacist, too? People who see racism in everything are usually (gasp!) racist.

The emotional writing on this site is inversely proportional to the quality of reporting. Facts and statistics would represent you better, rather than the drivel you put out regularly these days.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
PaulT (profile) says:

Re:

“Yes, anytime you stop black people it MUST be racism”

In the absence of any other logical reason to do so? Yes.

“People who see racism in everything are usually (gasp!) racist.”

No, that’s just the excuse that bigots use to justify their defensive actions when they’re not lying about things like CRT and where and how it’s taught (hint: not junior high, no matter how many R pols have claimed it).

“Facts and statistics would represent you better”

OK, so here’s your chance. What’s the fact that would make this a logical move? What is this piece of information you apparently have that turns this from “cops thought they’d get an easy weed conviction from a bus full of black kids” to something not racially motivated?

Why are you refusing to share this evidence that changes the entire scope of the story?

JMT (profile) says:

Re:

Yes, anytime you stop black people it MUST be racism.

There is plenty of statistical evidence that pretextual traffic stops are disproportionally inflicted on non-whites. We’re well beyond arguing if this is really a thing. Do you genuinely think this would’ve played out this badly if the cops boarded the bus and found a bunch of preppy white boys?

They can’t just be bad cops, right?

Oh, they can absolutely be bad cops too.

What, is the black sheriff a white supremacist, too?

Sherriff’s aren’t likely to publicly call out their deputies but I doubt he missed the racism either.

The emotional writing on this site is inversely proportional to the quality of reporting.

Claiming an argued point you disagree with is simply the writer being “emotional” is the absolute weakest response.

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: LAPD: "Why do you live here?"

It’s easy to see i have pink cheeks: I almost always approach/ witness a Police v local incident, others just don’t.
Interestingly, a white Cop will sometimes question me on why i am taking “Their side?”.
Also, i suspect my obvious lack of color has kept me alive (but not out of jail) for the last few decades

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

davec says:

One bullet from death, one mistake from prison.

All it takes is disgusting woke activists to flap their tongues and everything becomes a matter of race. My son is pulling out of your cesspools and when he’s finally out of the fire I will take immense pleasure in watching you feed on each other like the sissy snowflakes you are.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

One bullet from death, one mistake from prison.

Just like everyone else, you entitled fucking prick.

My son is pulling out of your cesspools and when he’s finally out of the fire I will take immense pleasure in watching you feed on each other like the sissy snowflakes you are.

Great! Tell him not to smack his ass on the way out!

Call me Al says:

As I recall one of the athletes had a wrapped gift in their bag that they’d been given by family in Georgia. An officer asked her what was in it and when she said she didn’t know he went ahead and opened it.

It is so clear that they started with a view of what they would find and desperately wanted to find. It is pathetic.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Cattress (profile) says:

Re:

That jackass officer thought not knowing what was in a gift wrapped package was suspicious… I applaud those young ladies for managing to prevent the phrase “dumb motherfucker” from escaping their mouths, I don’t think I would possess the same strength.
Frankly I think those officers just wanted to touch and sniff the panties of young women women that knuckle-draggers like them could never get the time of day from.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Peter says:

Even the reason for the stop was wrong

Even the traffic violation which they used for the pretext was incorrect. The law, OCGA 40-6-52 is to prevent trucks using the left hand lane. There is a specific exemption to the law for buses in (a)…”except buses an motorcoaches”.

The pretext stop was incorrect, which makes the manufactured Probable Cause illegal and the subsequent search illegal.

This is going to be a slam dunk lawsuit.

CSMcDonald (profile) says:

Re:

I had just come to comment with that after I looked it up (only one news article has bothered to mention this that I’ve seen so far)
O.C.G.A. 40-6-52)
 A “truck” is defined as any vehicle equipped with more than six wheels except buses and motorcoaches.
 On roads, streets, or highways with three or more lanes allowing for movement in the same direction, it shall be unlawful for any truck to operate in any lanes other than the two most right-hand lanes, except when the truck is preparing for a left turn.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
ke9tv (profile) says:

Re:

This is going to be a slam dunk lawsuit.

Slam dunk for qualified immunity. I’m sure there hasn’t been a case before where exactly six deputies stopped a bus carrying female college students for driving in the wrong lane on a Wednesday in Liberty County and searched their luggage, so how were the cops to know that was against the law?

OGquaker says:

Re: Then performed illegal search............

Total B.S. all around.
About 1989 our SCOTUS changed the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution to allow Janet Reno (once AG in Florida?) & the Drug Czar (previously Bush The Elder) to eliminate ANY pretext necessary to search each and every passenger on any inter-state “Public Transportation” as long as any citizen felt free to refuse their personal search. The State of California than removed the word AGRECULTURE from all California border check points, and armed “Officers” started walking aboard all the Greyhounds (Trailways was subsumed). No more privy than in any other public space.

P.S. ‘Privy” was a pit, your toilet in 1787, so the founders, and the Constructionist left privacy out of the verbiage.
P.P.S. by 2010, all Greyhounds had steel restraint rings at each hip and a single anchor at the shoe bar on all window seats.
P.P.P.S. “Drug” laws are enforced under “Health And Safety”, the Ten Amendments are irrelevent, as in War.

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: Bus Sweeps

In 1967, as a child i was on Greyhound one night heading North. When the bus stopped in the Bakersfield terminal, armed Officers removed every passenger that appeared to be “Mestizo” or “Spanish”. We continued on to San Francisco. Such is being born with a gun in your face.

I submit a rando search find supporting my conspiracy, see https://wwws.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/fulltime/nadler/nadler_noneedtoshout.pdf

Naughty Autie says:

Re: Re:

P.S. ‘Privy” was a pit, your toilet in 1787, so the founders, and the Constructionist left privacy out of the verbiage.

ORLY? Because it seems to me that the Fourth Amendment would apply here as well as the Fourteenth. You’re online, so you have zero excuse for your clear lack of research.

Naughty Autie says:

Re: Re: Re:2 According to the go-to...

The Fourth Amendment was adopted in response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, a type of general search warrant issued by the British government and a major source of tension in pre-Revolutionary America. The Fourth Amendment was introduced in Congress in 1789 by James Madison, along with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, in response to Anti-Federalist objections to the new Constitution. Congress submitted the amendment to the states on September 28, 1789. By December 15, 1791, the necessary three-fourths of the states had ratified it. On March 1, 1792, Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson announced that it was officially part of the Constitution.

Source: Wikipedia Article about the Fourth Amendment.

Peter says:

Even the pretext stop was incorrect.

Even the stated reason for the pretext stop (bus traveling in left lane) is bullshit.

The law used says, “O.C.G.A. 40-6-52 (2010) Trucks using multilane highways (a) As used in this Code section, the term “truck” means any vehicle equipped with more than six wheels, except buses and motorcoaches.”

So in conclusion: The pretext stop was incorrect. They manufactured probable cause with the dog. Then performed illegal searches. And then lied about it.

This should be a slam dunk lawsuit.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
PaulT (profile) says:

Re:

“Even the stated reason for the pretext stop (bus traveling in left lane) is bullshit.”

Even if it wasn’t – a bus driver not taking the correct lane results in all the passengers being searched for drugs? If it’s not racial, someone somewhere is missing a major part of the reasoning here.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

“he does “not believe any racial profiling took place.””

He also believe the Earth is flat, the sun revolves around us, and they we’re as stupid as he is.

“in case of child trafficking or drugs.”

There is this thing… its called evidence.
Did you have any or were your good ole boys just playing the colored folk lottery that they would find something they could turn into a federal case and oops they managed to violate the rights of all of these people based on nothing more than skin color.

This was a racist stop.
These are racist cops.
If it had been your daughter on the bus, would you still be sitting in the cabin claiming it was all on the up and up and flat out lying about what happened thats on the fucking video?

Of course one does wonder if there were any other buses from the event traveling in the same area that weren’t stopped, then we could ask why 1 bus was more likely to have drugs or trafficked kids hidden in luggage.

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: No need for a ruse

…they didn’t have anything sitting in the evidence locker that they could “find”?
All were comfortable with the stop, Just preforming their responsibilities, Cleaning up their community, Putting travelers in their place, Teaching youngsters social etiquette, Making sure officials are respected, Lying is part of our job description,
Must i continue?
Payton Gendron deserves complete absolution like Kyle Rittenhouse, George Zimmerman & Nobel Peace Prize winner Henry Kissinger. /s

Cattress (profile) says:

Re:

They didn’t even issue a citation to the driver for the supposed lane infraction they pulled him over for. And they never explained why the dog supposedly signalled the presence of drugs yet didn’t find any. Hmmm, I wonder if that dog was a lying racist?!
If they were so worried about child trafficking or sex trafficking, why didn’t they ask some of the young ladies if they were on the bus and participating on a voluntary basis? Nope, instead they tried to prompt a confession and implied that entirely legal things like food scales(which are commonly used by athletes that are on strict diets) were illegal.
I would like to know how many of these bus searches, particularly of those obviously filled with college athletes, have turned up anything, or anything more than a personal amount of pot that couldn’t possibly justify pulling 6 plus officers to help investigate. Have they found little white children cowering in sports equipment and duffle bags? Or busted a field hockey fentanyl ring?
And this bullshit in a town called Liberty.

Witness says:

Delaware State also Discriminates

A friend of mine applied to Delaware State in order to complete her Bachelor’s degree. While filling out an admissions form she noticed that the dates of birth input stopped at 1975. She was not able to complete that firm. Also, no admissions counselor has contacted her, although she has been waiting to here of an admission decision since January of this year.When she contacted counselor KK for information, she has never contacted her back with any guidance, nor a decision.Why??? My friend is a model honor student(4.0 gpa), and she works for a Delaware school district. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Hey, Delaware State looks like age discrimination to me.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Witness says:

Delaware State Also Discriminates!!

A friend of mine applied to Delaware State in order to complete her Bachelor’s degree. While filling out an admissions form she noticed that the dates of birth input stopped at 1975. She was not able to complete that form. Also, no admissions counselor has contacted her, although she has been waiting to hear of an admission decision since January of this year.When she contacted counselor KK for information, she has never contacted her back with any guidance, nor a decision for admission into their education program.Why??? My friend is a model honor student(4.0 gpa), and she is a member of an honor society and works for a Delaware school district. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Hey, Delaware State looks like age discrimination to me.

Witness says:

Delaware State Also Discriminates!!

A friend of mine applied to Delaware State in order to complete her Bachelor’s degree. While filling out an admissions form she noticed that the dates of birth input stopped at 1975. She was not able to complete that form. Also, no admissions counselor has contacted her, although she has been waiting to hear of an admission decision since January of this year.When she contacted a counselor for information, she has never contacted her back with any guidance, nor a decision for admission into their education program.Why??? My friend is a model honor student(4.0 gpa), and she is a member of an honor society and works for a Delaware school district. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Hey, Delaware State looks like age discrimination to me.

John85851 (profile) says:

I doubt much will change

Unfortunately, I don’t think much will change:

First, the officers will probably get away with qualified immunity, which means no jail time or any punishment. Though this assumes a prosecutor even moves forward with a criminal case, which may be unlikely.

Second, sure the parents and kids can sue, and they might win or get a settlement out of court. But guess what? That money comes from the government, which comes from the local taxpayers. Not one of the police officers will have to pay out a cent as a result of a lawsuit.

So again, why should cops change their behavior when they feel they’re doing the right thing and they won’t be held accountable for doing the wrong thing?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...