Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputy Allegedly Removed ‘Unauthorized” Sheriff’s Gang Tattoo With A Bullet
from the shootings-will-continue-until-morale-improves dept
The Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department is home to several gangs. Even though the current sheriff, Alex Villanueva, thinks this is up for debate (via a threatened lawsuit against the LA City Council), enough evidence (anecdotal and otherwise) points to deputies forming cliques that turn the Thin Blue Line from defensive to offensive.
Like any gang, the LASD’s gangs subject participants to hazing and an unwritten code of silence. Loyalty to the gang is supposed to surpass loyalty to the sheriff’s department or the public these deputies are supposed to serve. As any gang member can attest to, there is strength in numbers and the LASD’s gangs have managed to survive both a federal investigation and public scrutiny.
And, like any gang, a failure to play by these rules is met with punishment. At best, breaking the rules will result in ostracism. In most cases, though, rulebreakers are subjected to violence. Apparently, LASD deputies who are members of LASD gangs aren’t immune from this immutable fact of gang membership.
And like many gangs, the retaliation is generally known for its brutality, rather than its creativity. Yakuza members lose a finger when they’ve fucked up. LASD gang members lose whatever’s handy when the shit goes down, as Cerise Castle reports for KnockLA.
Deputies with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department attempted to shoot a deputy gang tattoo off of a man during a camping trip in Kern County in 2015. Department sources say the deputies shot the tattoo off because an unauthorized change had been made to the design. All deputy gang tattoo changes must be cleared with deputy gang leadership, several sources told Knock LA.
If you’re a fan of inter-agency ultraviolence, KnockLA has posted a photo of the resulting wound. (Content warning: jfc) If you’re a fan of torture porn, this might be your kink. If not, suffice to say tattoo recipients would probably prefer lasers or harsh acids to alter “unauthorized” tattoos.
Here’s what the much vaunted “training and experience” gets you when you combine camping trips (and, presumably, alcohol) with nonconformance to unwritten rules. The bullet to the ankle apparently followed less violent but presumably equally painful methods of altering the tattoo that had offended this deputy’s fellow gang members. ALLEGEDLY.
The shooting occurred when a group of deputies held down the tattooed man while another fired off several rounds of his off-duty weapon and attempted to burn the design off the man’s ankle with the hot barrel of the gun. When the deputy was unable to burn the tattoo off, he fired the gun directly at the other man’s tattoo, according to a source familiar with the incident. The injured deputy was transported from Dove Springs to the Antelope Valley Hospital in Lancaster in a private vehicle, according to lieutenant Bill Smallwood.
Lest we be sued by Sheriff Alex Villanueva for reporting on the gang members his department houses, we’ll be using the term “alleged” quite often. Allegedly, the deputy whose ankle was nearly removed by a bullet was allowed to access medical retirement, despite the fact the off-duty deputy had his ankle burnt and shot by other off-duty deputies during this ultra-bizarre, unofficial team-building exercise.
The trigger man, however, is ALLEGEDLY well-liked by the current sheriff — the one who insists there are no cliques/gangs operating under his allegedly inattentive nose at the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department.
A source familiar with the incident identified Wyatt Waldron of the Lancaster Sheriff’s Station as the deputy who pulled the trigger. Waldron was promoted to sergeant in 2021 under Sheriff Alex Villanueva.
A true man of the (certain) people, allegedly.
Two years after shooting a fellow deputy in the leg, Waldron was given the “Lifesaving Award” by LASD.
The shooting happened in 2015. At that point, it was reported as an “accidental discharge.” The LA Times article is headlined “L.A. County deputy accidentally shoots co-worker during camping trip.” The investigation of this incident was handed over to the Kern County Sheriff’s Department, another agency that seemingly has no problem with deputies handing out extrajudicial violence whenever they see fit.
Investigative irregularities are the name of the game, according to this KnockLA report. According to the LASD Inspector General, evidence was mishandled. The gun used to shoot the deputy was transported back to LA in a compartment of a trailer owned by another deputy. This deputy then turned the gun over to a third deputy who finally turned it over to investigators. The deputy who transported the gun then claimed he “couldn’t remember” who handed him the gun or even putting it in his trailer. The deputy who shot Waldron was initially interviewed by the Kern County Sheriff’s Department shortly after the shooting but months later, his statements to the LASD’s Internal Affairs Bureau were inconsistent with his earlier statements. And, despite admitting he had misled Kern County investigators, the LASD’s Internal Affairs Bureau decided not to pursue its investigation into the deputy.
In the end, it’s all deference. Rather than rock the gang-infested boat, the LASD, along with its oversight, decided it would be better to pretend this didn’t happen. And the LASD decided to reward the alleged tattoo shooter with a promotion and a “lifesaving” award that made him appear to be part of the solution to LA’s crime problems, rather than just another criminal destroying what’s left of the Department’s goodwill and trustworthiness.
Filed Under: alex villanueva, gang tattoo, lasd, police gangs
Comments on “Los Angeles Sheriff’s Deputy Allegedly Removed ‘Unauthorized” Sheriff’s Gang Tattoo With A Bullet”
Thank you for the work that you do. Really. This website is amazing. It’s important. It’s stuff you don’t see just anywhere, and it brings much needed transparency and shines a light on human rights abuses.
Re:
(>_<) =3
Well, thank God these guys are out there to protect us from, well, assholes like themselves.
Sorry ken
but it sounds like there may be some RICO around…
Re:
People hyperbolically claim police departments are gangs, but this is getting ridiculous.
Re: Re:
There is no hyperbole about it, they are in fact and by definition, gangs.
These are the people you surrender your autonomy to when you support gun control.
Re: Re: Re:
Tell us you don’t understand gun control without saying you don’t understand gun control.
Some added cold water: there are no number or types of firearms you could possibly own that would allow you to maintain your autonomy from the police.
Re: Re: Re:2
History has proven you wrong on many occasions.
Re: Re: Re:3
[Citation required]
Re: Re: Re:
First sentence good. Second sentence so, so bad.
Re: Re:
“People hyperbolically claim police departments are gangs, but this is getting ridiculous.”
Unfortunately police departments are highly conducive to forming gangs. Small groups of people roaming around high-risk areas of town wearing uniforms and sharing hazing rituals?
And if you’re a cop not in the gang you’ll be aware it’s your actual life on the life if you rat them out – or just fail to conform. So the rot spreads. There’s a reason 3 officers just stood by when Chauvin parked his knee on George Floyd’s throat.
There is no hyperbole around claiming the US police has become a gang. The only contextual difference to be found today is how violent and lawless the gang in question is. Some entire departments today operate like protection rackets, other fund themselves by using ‘civil forfeiture’ highwayman-style, others again deal drugs, and some have taken to white supremacy with a vengeance, using the badge for some legitimized lynching on the side.
I’d like to see “Davec” come in and run his usual *”Oh, the cops are all being maligned! My relatives used to be cops but now they’re hated despite their good intentions! Boo Hoo!” spiel.
But he won’t. He’ll just show up a few posts down the line and run that spiel while pretending shit like in the OP is just the rare aberration it has painfully become obvious that it isn’t.
Re: Re: Re:
There’s a reason 3 officers just stood by when Chauvin parked his knee on George Floyd’s neck and back.
FTFY. The official cause of death was positional asphyxiation, not strangulation.
Re: Re: Re:
How can this possibly be fixed? Root out the leadership root and branch and then hold them personally accountable for unlawful activities of their subordinates?
A national LEO permanent-record database so corrupt gang members can’t job hop to escape consequences of their misdeeds?
Mandatory training and zero-tolerance penalties for murder/racketeering?
To Protect and Serve…allegedly.
But hey on the upside, you don’t have to learn any specific colors to know who the gang members are in that area.
davec’s kind of cops.
Re:
Oh, no. “davec” just pretends cops like these either don’t exist or are statistically insignificant.
While the rest of the world already knows that a single bad cop in a precinct ruins every good deed done by the rest of the precinct the US cop apologist keeps pointing to the compost heap while claiming there’s just a few bad apples…
Re: Re:
Let’s see what they find.
Independent investigation of LASD ‘deputy gangs’ launched – Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-03-24/civilian-oversight-commisson-deputy-gangs-investigation
Re:
No. Davec’s kind of cops are the ones like his son that don’t see all the malfeasance going on around them. You know, the kind that would have let the unnamed man bleed out rather than seek medical treatment for him because doing so risks outside observation.
Re: Re:
They have been investigating this since the 70’s and so far, found nothing, yet you believe that every cop (not just deputies) knows about it and is in on it.
Since none of my kids have tattoos, I doubt they are members or know what the “gang” is up to.
Re: Re: Re:
They have been investigating this since the 70’s and so far, found nothing…
Because internal “investigations” never do and external investigations are hampered by the intentional withholding of data. So how does this prove your point? Oh, that’s right. It proves mine.
Re: Re: Re:2
Contrast davec’s deliberate false narrative with what’s been going on in the real world:
https://www.techdirt.com/2021/09/30/survey-confirms-los-angeles-sheriffs-department-is-still-home-to-dangerous-gangs-has-no-solid-plan-to-eliminate-them/
https://www.techdirt.com/2019/10/24/federal-lawsuit-targets-vicious-gang-composed-los-angeles-county-sheriffs-deputies/
https://www.techdirt.com/2022/02/22/la-sheriff-threatens-to-subject-city-council-to-defamation-law-if-they-wont-stop-calling-his-deputies-gang-members/
Re: Re: Re:3
If you think techdirt is the “real world” or unbiased, you need to climb out of your basement and take a walk in the sun. One of the reasons I post here is to provide a little daylight and fight against an echo chamber that makes no attempt to verify the facts or seek the truth.
Re: Re: Re:4
That’s right, davec. Ignore all the other reports linked to in those articles. As for your children not being in a gang because they don’t have specific tattoos, that says nothing about their propensity for violence. Didn’t you recently threaten an autistic commenter with a firearm on this site? The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree, as they say.
Re: Re: Re:5
If you are referring to this
This is exactly the dishonesty I have been referring to. You know I didn’t post that and it shows what little regard you have for the truth.
Re: Re: Re:6
No, I don’t know. The fact is that you have posted before while not logged in. It’s not hard to find examples of this. You have used the term “Stephen Stoned” as an insult. You have made it clear you have very little decorum for anyone that doesn’t kiss the footprint of cops the way you do. You have mentioned in several comments that you think millennials and people who don’t confirm to heteronormativity are the cause of everything that’s wrong with the world.
I have very little reason to believe that you did not post the linked comment. It’d be trivial for you to log out and post what’s truly on your mind, incite responses, then log back in to whine about the inevitable backlash.
Re: Re: Re:6
I’ll note that you haven’t actually responded to the external links in those Techdirt articles…
Re: Re: Re:4
Techdirt isn’t unbiased, but do you really think that all these reports are coming out of nowhere? Rhetorical question, I know. Your view of how cops behave doesn’t extend beyond the veneer of your son’s colleagues telling him that everything is above board and nothing to worry about.
What sort of verification were you expecting here? To take your word for it? To make favorable assumptions? In your words, your entire point of being here is to troll a website that even you acknowledged was insignificant in terms of viewership and commenter numbers. What did you think was going to happen if your entire point is to bait commentary?
Re: Re: Re:4
Why do you think you gan gaslight about something trivially disproven by seeing your post histpry where you have never once done what you pretend you are?
Re: Re: Re:5
Something something his son, something something veteran, something something ungrateful woke activists who can’t decide what gender they are today.
davec puts a lot of effort into saying he’s racist without saying he’s racist.
It’s all part of the same package: They identified the gun through ballistics evidence, and traced it back to the deputy who fired it through a bite mark on the shell casing.
All part of modern science!
Milwaukee has a great cordless grinder that would work great with a wire wheel brush. This is actually a known method for such things.
Re:
But, but, but, the only hand held tool cops know how to use is a gun.
The whole thing was an accident. I thought I’d packed the laser tattoo removal guns. Honest.
inquiring minds want to know
What, no picture of the approved tattoo nor description of the unauthorized change?