Top Publishers Aim To Own The Entire Academic Research Publishing Stack; Here's How To Stop That Happening

from the protocols-not-platforms dept

Techdirt’s coverage of open access — the idea that the fruits of publicly-funded scholarship should be freely available to all — shows that the results so far have been mixed. On the one hand, many journals have moved to an open access model. On the other, the overall subscription costs for academic institutions have not gone down, and neither have the excessive profit margins of academic publishers. Despite that success in fending off this attempt to re-invent the way academic work is disseminated, publishers want more. In particular, they want more money and more power. In an important new paper, a group of researchers warn that companies now aim to own the entire academic publishing stack:

Over the last decade, the four leading publishing houses have all acquired or developed a range of services aiming to develop vertical integration over the entire scientific process from literature search to data acquisition, analysis, writing, publishing and outreach. User profiles inform the corporations in real time on who is currently working on which problems and where. This information allows them to offer bespoke packaged workflow solutions to institutions. For any institution buying such a workflow package, the risk of vendor lock-in is very real: without any standards, it becomes technically and financially nearly impossible to substitute a chosen service provider with another one. In the best case, this non-substitutability will lead to a practically irreversible fragmentation of research objects and processes as long as a plurality of service providers would be maintained. In the worst case, it will lead to complete dependence of a single, dominant commercial provider.

Commenting on this paper, a post on the MeaseyLab blog calls this “academic capture“:

For those of us who have lived through state capture, we felt powerless and could only watch as institutions were plundered. Right now, we are willing participants in the capture of our own academic freedom.

Academic capture: when the institutions’ policies are significantly influenced by publishing companies for their profit.

Fortunately, there is a way to counter this growing threat, as the authors of the paper explain: adopt open standards.

To prevent commercial monopolization, to ensure cybersecurity, user/patient privacy, and future development, these standards need to be open, under the governance of the scholarly community. Open standards enable switching from one provider to another, allowing public institutions to develop tender or bidding processes, in which service providers can compete with each other with their services for the scientific workflow.

Techdirt readers will recognize this as exactly the idea that lies at the heart of Mike’s influential essay “Protocols, Not Platforms: A Technological Approach to Free Speech“. Activist and writer Cory Doctorow has also been pushing for the same thing — what he calls “adversarial interoperability“. It seems like an idea whose time has come, not just for academic publishing, but every aspect of today’s digital world.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter, Diaspora, or Mastodon.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Top Publishers Aim To Own The Entire Academic Research Publishing Stack; Here's How To Stop That Happening”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Can't get into prior piece! But here 'tis.

Mel Bourne Loch-Doone

If the politicians stay bought, GOOGLE and Facebook will RULE.

As effective Royalty. Just this week, Youtube has Ruled that any "anti-vaccine" info is to be censored. — It’s never concern for The Public that prohibits speech, it’s always authoritarian.

Nothing in dense blather above mentions the needed change of status for the mega-corps as "common carriers", at the very least, to establish that they’re not to enforce own political agenda.

Comment Held for Moderation…

Thanks for your comment.
It will be reviewed by our staff before it is posted.

Isn’t that "ironic" given the title of this piece?

Dozens of attempts to get in, as usual! While pretending to be an authority on internet forums, in fact Maz has to lock out all dissent.

Techdirt is now just pretending to be for "free speech", a few shreds of dirty gauze all that remains.

TD used to be open, but now Maz’s true agenda for corporate control of all speech on teh internets are clear, which ran off all reasonable persons.

The lock-out and the few fanboys remaining show how popular are your views. You insignificant academic clowns can natter among only your "safe" fellow travelers, but don’t dare let ordinary people have even a say. You’re simply WEAK proto-tyrants.

You’re also not valued technocrats as believe: to Them you’re among the most useless of eaters.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Not Very New or Innovative

Schools have been doing the same thing for years with football conferences. You play mainly games in your own conference. Games against non-conference schools do not count so much.

Here, you would have a very small number of “important” publishers. Each school picks one publisher silo. Their research is then tailored to their publisher’s needs. Their papers cite mainly other papers published by their own publisher, papers published outside of their silo are less important and given less weight.

Properly implemented, it would help prop up the otherwise somewhat obsolete academic publishing companies.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...