Elon Musk's Pointless, Subsidized Tunnels Head To Flood-Prone Florida

from the Tony-Stark-you-ain't dept

If you hadn’t noticed by now — and if you’re part of his rabid fanbase you haven’t — there’s often a bit of a chasm between what Elon Musk promises and what usually gets delivered. For every notable innovation his companies deliver, there always seem to be a handful of other side products that promise the moon and deliver something more akin to a Styrofoam ball slathered in grey paint.

One of the best recent examples has been Musk’s promises in terms of revolutionizing mass transit. Via his Boring company, Musk has routinely hoovered up taxpayer subsidies in exchange for projects he claims will revolutionize public transportation, but wind up doing nothing of the sort. In Las Vegas, for example, Musk’s company managed to nab the $52 million contract to deliver an innovative new public transit option. Instead he delivered what was little more than some Teslas driving slowly through a narrow neon-lighted fire death trap tunnel.

Because portraying Musk as a real life super-genius Tony Stark is fun and drives ad eyeballs, the press tends to lend more credulity to these proceedings than is usually warranted, something made abundantly clear in the wake of the Las Vegas “hyperloop” launch. An inefficiently slow, one-way neon tunnel filled with non-automated Tesla taxis was somehow reported by major media outlets as if we’d cured cancer:

This being America, where we’re not keen on this whole “learning from experience thing,” Musk’s Boring company is now bidding on a similar contract in Fort Lauderdale, Florida — a region facing looming flooding and infrastructure catastrophes in the face of accelerating climate change:

“Like all of South Florida, Fort Lauderdale faces an extreme threat from sea level rise. The ocean there has risen by up to eight inches (20.3 centimeters) since 1950. Most Fort Lauderdale residents live less than five feet (1.5 meters) above sea level, including a majority in areas deemed Special Flood Hazard Areas by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Things could get much worse, though. A conservative estimate forecasts up to two feet (0.6 meters) of sea level rise could hit Fort Lauderdale by mid-century, which would vastly increase the risk of flooding.”

Please note how mainstream outlets busy discussing this latest bid simply can’t be bothered to note the underwhelming, wasteful nature of the Las Vegas project, or the stupidity in digging a bunch of new tunnels in a coastal area about to be pummeled by repeated flooding. What Florida, like much of the US, needs is infrastructure programs that can withstand the test of extreme climate. And mass transit options that genuinely deliver inexpensive and efficient transportation alternatives with an eye on reducing overall traffic. What Florida, like Vegas, is probably getting is… not that:

“Part of proactive climate action is ensuring that every single new infrastructure project accounts for climate risk, and hazard risk more generally,? said [Samantha Montano, an assistant professor in emergency management at Massachusetts Maritime Academy]. ?Building this kind of underground infrastructure in a community that is already facing persistent flooding seems like a poor use of resources.”

But we’re going to do it anyway. And when it delivers a tiny fraction of the innovation that Musk originally promised, then stops working entirely due to intense coastal flooding from climate change, we’re going to… pretend that never happened and simply roll right on to the next expensive, bad idea.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: boring company

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Elon Musk's Pointless, Subsidized Tunnels Head To Flood-Prone Florida”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Soil dynamics is your enemy

Elton Camp may be a US poet, but he’s still trying to sell a viewpoint. That is, "your building on a beach causes my insurance rates to climb".

But the portion of a state that takes damage from hurricanes? All of it. And for those on the beach? Well, they’re paying for Hurricane and Flood insurance on top of their home premiums, now aren’t they?

Your point about soil liquefaction applies more to earthquake zones than beaches. "Building on sand" still stands as a good point, though. Google "Millenium Tower".

Bobvious says:

Re: Re: Soil dynamics is your enemy

"soil liquefaction applies more to earthquake zones than beaches."

Generally speaking, but here the building substrate is susceptible to any source of vibration or change in moisture levels. That nearby building work might have affected both. Eventually a forensic analysis of the Florida collapse will occur and we’ll have a better idea.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Re: Re: Soil dynamics is your enemy

"your building on a beach causes my insurance rates to climb"

In fairness, it does not cause the insurance rates to rise as much as they should. Two problems prevent this natural market operation.

First, subsidized flood insurance. Almost everyone who buys needs a mortgage loan, and the bank requires flood insurance when you are in a low area such as a beach. Flood insurance would be fabulously expensive in such areas, except for the federal subsidy which makes it much cheaper than would be actuarily sound.

Second, state supported “catastrophe” reinsurance, meaning that the risk of great damage is shifted to the taxpayers rather than the near-ocean property owners who present the greatest risk of suffering casualty. Here, some but not all of the state support is loaded onto regular insurance policies in safer areas.

Together, these operate as a sort of Reverse Robin Hood. The more impecunious taxpayers provide the support so that the better-off may own waterfront properties. Be assured that oceanfront property owners are generous at campaign contribution time.

In a sane market, it would be essentially impossible to obtain affordable insurance within a mile of the ocean. Underwriters would flee from such opportunities.

Lostinlodos (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Soil dynamics is your enemy

“ Reverse Robin Hood.”
One minor note: being a member of a large family that has some in Florida. And other Pacific and gulf states.
Beach front property isn’t as expensive or elite as the general public believes.

Outside of hot spots prices tend to be fairly low. Being on the state or local maintained beach will always cost: 75k+ for a half acre.

But there’s lots of less costly options.
You can get 2-4 acres at under 50k in northern south Florida for under $50k! If you don’t mind your ocean front being swamp.
Even less slightly off the ocean.
Not everyone has a beachfront McMansion.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Boba Fat (profile) says:

A tunnel in what? Water?

Ft. Lauderdale is only 9 feet above (today’s) sea level, and the ground is mostly limestone, coral, and mud. Building a tunnel would be more like holding a giant pool noodle under the sea.

On the plus side, it should be easy to dig.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: A tunnel in what? Water?

Yes, putting a tunnel under Ft Lauderdale is beyond sill. Why, it’s almost as stupid as putting a train tunnel under the English Channel. Both are totally impractical.

Oh wait…

Sorry, but the fact is Today tunnels are often put under rivers through soft rock and mud. That’s not to say that this particular tunnel system makes any sense. The whole city will probably be underwater before the investment is recouped. Of course, this being Florida, it’s not politically correct to mention that…

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: A tunnel in what? Water?

My friend’s father had contracts to build lots of tunnels, all his sons worked in the caissons under NY rivers. Jerry’s brother died, but the Greenwood tunnels kept getting delivered; the world is full of such losers. Better to stay home on your computer and hide your failures.

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: Elon's just a big a hole, draining our lives

The Los Angeles Regional Connector light-rail tunnel, in shallow alluvial soil and 3.8 million man-hours since 2014. That hole might be opened in 2022. Musk’s $52,000,000 Gov-mont Sub-sy-die would buy 172 feet of the NEW Los Angeles Regional Connector….. an average man’s long baseball throw. To quote Ronald Reagan: It’s a walk

OldMugwump (profile) says:

Let him build it with his own money

If Mr. Musk wants to build Florida tunnels with his own, or investor’s money – by all means, cheer him on. Maybe he can deliver another miracle (don’t discount a guy who can land two 50 meter tall rockets simultaneously when NASA has never landed even one). I can’t embed phtoos here but https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/2019/06/25/side-boosters-have-landed/

Taxpayer money, no.

Yes, Musk has a habit of picking up large sums of money the government leaves on the ground. But he’s just picking them up – it’s our elected officials who drop it there.

Bloof (profile) says:

Re: Let him build it with his own money

And people like Musk didn’t in any way lobby to get tax breaks and subsidies, he didn’t spend a single penny on politicians to get payouts from the government, nope! He just walked along and found free money and special treatment waiting for him for being the one honest person in business.

XcOM987 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Let him build it with his own money

If Mr. Musk wants to build Florida tunnels with his own, or investor’s money – by all means, cheer him on. Maybe he can deliver another miracle (don’t discount a guy who can land two 50 meter tall rockets simultaneously when NASA has never landed even one).

You mean like the DC-X in 1996 which was developed in conjunction with the US Governement and then passed on to NASA who continued development and completed a test flight and landing in 1996:
Image of first landing in 1996
[Video of first landing[(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wv9n9Casp1o)

The idea isn’t anything new, like 99% of what Musk comes out with.

Lostinlodos (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Let him build it with his own money

Though he was inaccurate he does have a point. Two actually.
First, the government never did come up with a reliable method for what he’s now doing rocket wise.

Second, if it’s not tax payer money…? Have at it. If it works, kool, if not,
Kool!

Personally, I’d be far quicker to support off ground, deep-dug-support, high speed elevated electro-magnetic monorail down 3 state corridors.

Seems like a far more effective project.

OGquaker says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Capital (ism) at it's Apogee

DC-X was bought by Boeing, re-named (as Boeing does with everything Boeing takes from others with mostly tax-$$) and tossed into the ashcan. To much $$profit for stockholders (and CEO’s with stock "buy-backs") dumping every $200million 1950’s US military designed booster into the ocean: "Delta"=Douglas. The CEO of Coca-Cola mentioned on PBS that 70% of all American’s "hydration" (liquid drink) is out of a SINGLE USE CONTAINER, a 320 million-tons-a-year Great Pacific Garbage Patch, all manufactured from mined petroleum…. Capital (ism) at it’s Apogee.

P.S. Single-stage into Earth orbit (DC-X) is useless, see Bezo’s Salvage-1 rocket. Stop the BS.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: let them stew in their juices

July 1st, 2021
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/7/1/2033990/-The-Republican-fight-against-high-speed-rail-in-Florida-exposes-their-grift
The public transportation system above was once a TRUMP project, and just this last year it permanently blocked the SpaceX’s rocket-building site in Cocoa, Florida.
"The real reason for progressives’ passion for trains is their goal of diminishing Americans’ individualism in order to make them more amenable to collectivism." -George Will.
Who are we carrying water for?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...