Your Slingbox Will Be A Useless Brick In A Few Years

from the you-don't-own-what-you-buy dept

Remember the Slingbox? It was a piece of hardware by Dish subsidiary Sling Media that let users beam TV content from your home cable box to anywhere else. Sling was public enemy number one among entrenched cable and broadcast industry gatekeepers, because its products (*gasp*) not only made life easier on consumers, but at one point integrated ad-skipping technology. Back in 2013 the broadcast and cable industry was so pissed at Sling, it managed to get a best-of-show CES award retracted by CNET and CBS simply because the industry didn’t like the disruptive nature of the company’s technologies. Ah, memories.

This week, Sling Media announced that all Slingboxes will effectively become useless paperweights in a few years. In a company announcement, it says the technology will no longer work at all as of November 9, 2022:

“Slingbox servers will be permanently taken offline 24 months after the discontinued announcement date (November 9, 2020), at which point ALL Slingbox devices and services will become inoperable.

Until then, most Slingbox models will continue to work normally, but the number of supported devices for viewing will steadily decrease as versions of the SlingPlayer apps become outdated and/or lose compatibility.

The shift isn’t particularly surprising given that the streaming era has effectively made such technology irrelevant. Users can now obtain streams of numerous apps on any platform they like. And software like Plex similarly let users stream content from their home PC anywhere they have a reliable internet connection. Streaming from your home cable box isn’t as popular because people are not only cutting the cord at a record pace, they’re shifting to streaming platforms that are inherently more flexible. Evolution made Sling irrelevant. The company kind of explains this all to users, but not really:

Q: Why is Slingbox being discontinued?

A: We?ve had to make room for new innovative products so that we can continue to serve our customers in the best way possible.

Q: Will Slingbox be releasing any new products?

A: No.

At the same time, it’s yet another example of how in the modern era, you simply don’t really own the things you buy. Firmware updates can often eliminate functionality promised to you at launch, as we saw with the Sony PlayStation 3. And with everything now relying on internet-connectivity, companies can often give up on supporting devices entirely, often leaving users with very expensive paperweights as we saw after Google acquired Revolv, then bricked users’ $300 smart home hub. Now it’s the Slingbox’s turn to head to that great gadget graveyard in the sky.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: sling media

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Your Slingbox Will Be A Useless Brick In A Few Years”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

It’s not really that you don’t own it, but rather you’re relying on services run by another party. The question is whether or not those services are actually required to accomplish the function of the device, or have been placed there to prevent you from using your purchased device in ways the company doesn’t like.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re:

"It’s not really that you don’t own it, but rather you’re relying on services run by another party"

Yeah, in this case it’s not so problematic as the reason for the device is to access a specific service. This isn’t like a typical IoT device that does things that should be possible without the service connection but gets bricked when that service dies.

Think more like an alarm device that doesn’t work when it can’t communicate with the security company when they go out of business and less like a Nest that can’t control your heating because some random server got shut down.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Many IoT devices perform a function that doesn’t seem to require a centralized server. However, if you want to be able to control your device using your smart phone then the vast majority of users will require that centralized service. Most people don’t know enough about networking to follow simple instructions on how to expose your device to the internet, maybe support dynamic DNS and then how to connect a mobile app to your home device. The centralized service solves all these problems but creates new cost which must be borne by the users.

Those of us who know how to do the above can thank all of those who don’t for this pointless, costly and ultimately self-defeating subscription requirement.

PaulT (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

"However, if you want to be able to control your device using your smart phone then the vast majority of users will require that centralized service"

That’s a design flaw, not an issue with the device. There’s nothing to stop such a device from accessing your phone via your router and performing functions without ever leaving your home network. Lack of end user knowledge is not an excuse for external services being forced.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

" you’re relying on services run by another party."

afaik, Many sling customers purchased said device when it was a standalone device. Subsequently, a firmware update forced usage of cloud services which killed the standalone option.

How is this "not owning it"? You have no say in what or how it does anything and yet you paid money for it to do something that it no longer does … although it could.

Miles (profile) says:

DIY Streaming

I’ve learned how to stream over the internet without Sling or Plex.

I use MythTv to record over-the-air TV (I live in the City of Seattle and pickup 78(!) TV channels.) I then move the stuff I’m interested in to my Ubuntu server where they are made available by my Apache web server. I also purchase DVDs and rip ’em. Inside the house I use Kodi to organize and play everything, and it’s all stored where the web server can find them.

I’m pretty sure they won’t discontinue Apache in the near future.

Rekrul says:

2030 – "We regret to inform you that as of July 1st, your v1 smart toilet will no longer function when we take the servers offline. We suggest that you purchase one of our new and improved v3 models and repurpose your old model as a planter. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Also, we are dropping all support for our smart faucets as of December 1st, so if you still require water after that date, we suggest you make other arrangements such as buying bottled water."

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: ridiculous

Sling TV works great on any device you would be logging back in to your box with so it’s time to at least move into 2017.

Because update for update’s sake right?

People need to get off of these damn treadmills. They keep buying the same shit once every 6 months – 3 years, and get nothing for it except the "better security" available at the time of purchase.

Don’t even get me started on all of the OSS idiots that update to the latest bleeding edge build of a library the second it’s available and then bitch and whine that their user’s distros don’t have it yet. (Quick! xkcd 927 a new package manager! That will fix the problem.) They are insufferable. One project, I won’t name names but it had something to do with an intelligent aquatic species, demanded everyone update to the latest version of a GUI toolkit library because it allowed them to remove a whopping 5 lines of already written code from their source, that broke the build on any system without the latest version of said library. Eventually they just started building the library in-tree just to shut people up.

Then people bitch about all the e-waste….. how about not throwing away perfectly good hardware just because a company wants to make another quick buck? Or better yet, buy hardware you can actually maintain yourself, and never spend the money again.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...