Mississippi City Trying To Turn Residents' Doorbell Cameras Into Law Enforcement Surveillance Network

from the Jackson-city-council-just-saying-the-quiet-part-loud dept

The Ring doorbell/camera has become a fixture of American life, thanks in part to Ring’s partnership with law enforcement agencies. In exchange for steering people towards Ring’s snitch app, the company has been giving deeply discounted doorbell cameras to police, who then hand them out to homeowners with the implied assumption homeowners will return the favor by handing footage over to cops any time they ask.

There are millions of cameras out there and Ring-enabled portals for law enforcement officers to request footage. If warrants seem to be too much trouble, Ring lets police know they can always approach the company with a subpoena to access recordings stored in Ring’s cloud.

Some enterprising city legislators are narrowing the gap between cops and homeowners’ cameras. A trial program is underway in Mississippi that would give police direct access to cameras, as Edward Ongweso Jr. reports for Vice. (h/t FourthAmendment.com]

On Tuesday, Jackson, Mississippi’s city council signed off on a 45-day pilot program that would let police access Ring surveillance cameras in real time.

In partnership with technology companies PILEUM and Fūsus, the pilot program will run through the police department’s surveillance hub, the Real Time Crime Center, from which Jackson’s police department can stream Ring surveillance camera footage.

The goal, of course, is to fight crime. But the methods are concerning, to say the least. The expansion of law enforcement’s surveillance network in Jackson co-opts cameras owned by private citizens. The police feel this would be a boon for their “Real Time Crime Center,” allowing them to seamlessly access any footage instantly near scenes of reported crimes. According to the mayor, this is a net win for everyone, but it provides the most benefit to the local government, which won’t have to spend money to purchase more CCTV cameras.

None of this is mandatory. Businesses and private citizens have to sign a waiver to grant the police real-time access to their cameras. But this move towards more pervasive surveillance comes at a strange time for the city, which recently took steps to limit local law enforcement’s access to surveillance tech.

This may come as a surprise to those who remember that just a few months ago, Jackson was the first city in the South to ban police from using facial recognition technology.

That might explain why this surveillance hub isn’t much of a hub at this point. According to Vice’s report, there are only five private participants in this program. As for Ring, it’s distancing itself from this co-opting of its cameras, stating that this isn’t a Ring program and the company has had no participation in this program. And while that may be true in this case, the company hasn’t been shy about pushing cameras on citizens via law enforcement and encouraging law enforcement to lean on recipients for camera footage.

This may not be Ring’s doing, but that’s always been the implicit promise of its hundreds of partnerships with law enforcement agencies: an expanded surveillance network that costs cops almost nothing. It hasn’t always worked out the way Ring suggests it will, but this trial program makes it clear others will step up to create a network of their own if Ring can’t or won’t help out.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: amazon, fusus, pileum

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Mississippi City Trying To Turn Residents' Doorbell Cameras Into Law Enforcement Surveillance Network”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Upstream (profile) says:

The real goal

The goal, of course, is to fight crime.

That may be what they say. I think a more accurate description of the goal is to collect as much information as possible about as many people as possible, on the theory that all of this information might some day come in handy to help create the misleading impression that someone was involved in some criminal activity with which they actually had no connection at all. Just as a skilled prosecutor can take virtually anything anyone says and twist it to make the person appear guilty of some crime, so they can also take video and present it in a context which accomplishes the same end. The more video they have, the more raw material they have to work with.

Here is an interesting article on this idea in terms of "taking the 5th."

An Internet search for "why you shouldn’t talk to the police" will result in untold number of results, but few present the option outlined in the above linked article. The reasons we shouldn’t talk to the police are the same reasons we shouldn’t let the police (or other government agencies, or anyone else, for that matter) take video of everything we do and everywhere we go.

The surveillance state has gotten seriously out of hand. We need to do everything we can to rein it in and to not let it continue to grow.

Anonymous Coward says:

It’s just another reason why I’ll never have a RING doorbell. I have my home POE cameras recording 24/7 onto my NVR. I sure as hell will never give the police access to them. Even though I’m on an inside corner and so have a good wide view of quite a bit in not the best area.

My Doorbell is a cheap, basic wireless Doorbell I got when I first got my house about 6-8 years ago from Home Depot. I think I’ve changed the batteries on both ends once in all that time. It still works. I think I paid around $10 for it at the time.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...