That Time EFF Got A Copyright Takedown Demand Of Its Own Artwork

from the you-have-to-be-kidding dept

Earlier this week, EFF received an email claiming that our body-camera police officer illustration (shown in the banner above) violated the sender’s copyright in a graphic they used to illustrate a tweet (cropped screenshot shown below). The email demanded we remove the image or provide a link to their e-commerce website, which sells police body cameras. For those interested in Search Engine Optimization (SEO), a link from EFF can be very beneficial to their page ranking. The funny thing was, the police officer illustration is an original EFF work.

It’s not a problem for someone to use our works in their own?they are available to the public under a Creative Commons attribution license?but that certainly doesn’t give a claim against our original. And their graphic had no attribution. (The Action Camera skateboarder illustration on the left appears to be an Adobe stock image.)

For EFF, this was more amusing than threatening. We knew instantly that we needn’t worry about the implied threat, and if things went badly, we probably have more IP litigators per capita than any entity that’s not a boutique IP litigation firm. So, we wrote back explaining the situation, and expect that will be the end of this.

But for many entities, it can be quite scary. Even if they are secure in their rights, the potential for a costly or time-consuming conflict may lead to a rational choice that a link is a low-cost solution. They might wonder if this misunderstanding will escalate into a DMCA takedown, potentially interfering with the availability of the page until the improper notice is resolved. Even if they disregard such a weak threat, dealing with it has the serious potential to take time away from running their operation.

We have not named the email’s sender. There is no indication that they are in the business of copyright trolling, it likely was a simple mistake, and we had no desire to use our platform to mobilize a shame campaign. Moreover, we’re well aware of the Streisand effect and see no need to provide the very link they seek in our discussion of why they shouldn’t have demanded a link. Instead, we hope that this example serves to show how copyright demands can be misused. Below is our response:


I am the General Counsel of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and am writing in response to your email of September 10, in which you asserted that the illustration of a police officer in our Body Warn Camera page,, violated your company’s rights in the image used in your July 4 tweet, and demanded that we remove the illustration or provide a commercial link to your company on the website.

As an initial matter, please allow me to correct a fundamental mistake. The illustration on our page is an original image created by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, specifically our talented Art Director Hugh D’Andrade. Accordingly, you have no right to ask EFF, or anyone else, to remove our illustration, much less to provide your company with links or other benefits in exchange for its use. To the extent that you have sent similar demands to anyone else regarding our illustration, you will need to retract them immediately.

This is not to say that you can never use our illustration. In addition to your rights under fair use and fair dealing, EFF makes its content available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0 US) license, see Thus, you would have had permission to use our illustration in your tweet if you had simply complied with the attribution requirement. If you wish to continue to use the police officer illustration, please be sure to comply with these license terms.

Finally, while we understand your desire to get links to your company’s website (and the SEO value of a link from EFF), we are disappointed and surprised that you would use copyright threats to try to make that happen. Baseless copyright threats are an ongoing problem for the Internet (see examples in our Takedown Hall of Shame Rather than contributing to that problem, we suggest that you and your company endeavor to earn that attention through the quality of your offerings.

In order to better educate the public about the issues with copyright demands, please note that we are blogging about your email and this response, but will endeavor to keep your name and the name of your company out of it.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

best regards,


Kurt Opsahl,
Deputy Executive Director and General Counsel
Electronic Frontier Foundation
ph: +1 415.436.9333 x 106 \ fx: +1 415.436.9993 \ @kurtopsahl

Reprinted from the EFF’s Deeplinks blog.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: eff

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “That Time EFF Got A Copyright Takedown Demand Of Its Own Artwork”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
'Lightning' Rod Bolton says:

Even if "your" original, according to Techdirt IT'S NOT YOURS!

The funny thing was, the police officer illustration is an original EFF work.

Please read this:

By the above piece, "your" (the word here is possessive pronominal adjective for EFF) organization cannot have artwork which is "yours" (meaning "that or those belonging to you": "possession" in any sense of that word).

You are trying to claim a non-existent merely "government-granted monopoly" over an "infinite" good. No matter who or how many claim possession — even if false as you seem to mistakenly believe when doesn’t belong to YOU, either! — you still have "your" graphic and are none the poorer!

Because it’s not "your" graphic, you have NO right to object or defend, not even enough right to put out this bit of snark.

The whole "your" notion is a BIT trickier than you think. (I adapt that from the Monty Python Robin Hood sketch, because I’m not a thief and attribute when can.)

James Burkhardt (profile) says:

Re: Even if "your" original, according to Techdirt IT'S NOT YOUR

Questions on if the illustration is property do not impact questions of who owns the copyright in an image. The EFF notes that it exercises a light touch with its government granted rights, and as such is widely allowed to make use of the image the EFF has rights to, but for that party to claim ownership of the rights to the image would be false.

If you take the language of your linked article and untangle the existing conflation of the image and the government granted rights to the image that your linked article clearly notes is a problem with our current discussion, nothing the EFF says here conflicts with the TechDirt article.

That One Guy (profile) says:

And that is why you check your targets first...

I’m not sure which is funnier, that they legitimately believed they had a valid claim and thought they could strongarm the gorram EFF into giving them more traffic, or they knew their claim was bogus and thought by sending a threat letter they could get attention and traffic anyway.

Either way though it would seem their demands have rather nicely blown up in their faces, and all that’s left is to pick up any stray popcorn kernels from the entertainment they provided making public fools of themselves.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...