Attorney General Threatens To Prosecute Reporters For Doing Their Job

from the with-great-power-comes-great-ridiculousness dept

Following a trail blazed by Maryland councilman Kirby Delauter, a Virgin Islands Attorney General is making an ass of herself by threatening journalists for having the audacity to do their job. Delauter infamously publicly attacked a reporter for daring to publish his name in her paper, apparently unaware that this sort of thing happens to public officials roughly all the damn time. The ensuing internet maelstrom forced a retraction and apology from Delauter.

The Virgin Islands Daily News is still waiting for an apology from acting Attorney General Terri Griffiths for this wholly inappropriate response to acts of journalism. [via Jim Romenesko]

Acting Attorney General Terri Griffiths told executives of The Virgin Islands Daily News on Thursday morning that she will prosecute the newspaper on criminal charges because of its telephone calls to obtain comment and information from her.

“I’ll be filing criminal charges against you,” Griffiths said as she abruptly left a meeting at The Daily News’ offices on St. Thomas.

She also claimed a quote appearing in one of the paper’s stories was “fabricated.” This is the quote:

“I will not comment on the Parole Board hearings.”

This quote seems like something an attorney general would be very likely to say. In fact, the refusal to comment has long been a hallmark of law enforcement-press relations. Not commenting is the national pastime of law enforcers, who are often the first party to issue a solid “no comment” after controversial incidents. But Griffith claims this completely innocuous and completely boring quote was fabricated. The Daily News found otherwise.

The Daily News has reviewed Griffiths’ allegations that a quote attributed to her had been fabricated and stands by its published report, Robbins said.

“We take any report of inaccuracy very seriously, and we publish a clarification or correction if an error appears in print,” Robbins said. “In this case, we found that the reporter was accurate.”

But Griffiths is more upset that Daily News reporters are calling her on her cell phone to obtain additional “no comments” on various stories involving her office. This would almost be a legitimate complaint (provided you ignore the ensuing “I’ll put you in jail” threat that accompanied it), if it weren’t for the fact that Griffiths herself provided the cell phone number to the paper.

Griffiths spoke at length about her desire not to be called on the cell phone or after hours, and she termed the calls “telephone harassment.”

Daily News reporters have called Griffiths on her cell when unable to reach her on her office phone. The cell number they used is the one she provided to the newspaper.

The meeting broke down when Robbins asked Griffiths to answer specific questions about her grievances.

Griffiths objected to that and said she did not want to be “blindsided.”

“I don’t want to talk to your reporters ever. There will be no communication between me and The Daily News ever again,” she said.

She asked Robbins whether he would instruct reporters not to call her on the cell phone.

Robbins said, “No.”

Griffiths then left the meeting, announcing, “Then I am going to file criminal charges against you.”

Welcome to the life of a public figure, Ms. Griffiths. Reporters are going to call you when your input is needed or desired. It won’t always be during business hours, especially if your office can’t provide “I will not comment” (non)comments in your absence. Certainly, an excessive amount of calls after “business hours” (whatever that means to powerful law enforcement figures/journalists — I would imagine those timetables have significant differences) would be irritating, but it doesn’t rise to the level of harassment.

And Griffiths’ comment about resenting being “blindsided” strongly suggests she’d rather not deal with this part of the job at all. Any question can be deferred to a later time if the answer isn’t immediately apparent, but the pattern of calls Griffiths calls “harassment” suggests she’s not exactly forthcoming or timely in her responses.

Harassment may be a crime, but journalism isn’t. If Griffiths would rather not answer questions, she can place that burden on her staff. Or she can communicate only through official statements and press releases. Or she can give the newspaper guidance on what times are acceptable to call. But what she definitely can’t do — or at least shouldn’t — is abuse the power of her position to mute pesky guardians of public accountability.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Attorney General Threatens To Prosecute Reporters For Doing Their Job”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

When you are a public official and your position of the office you hold is the top official for that department, then you should bloody well assume that your are speaking on behalf of that office and it’s policies.

The mere fact that a reporter has questions pertaining to legal matters that may be of interest to the public and asks for comment is justified.

The fact that she provided her cell number and her office numbers to the media is her own problem, so don’t act like a child when the media calls to ask you something that you don’t want to answer.

The fact she is having a temper tantrum because she doesn’t want to answer some question because she fells she will get ambushed is all part and parcel of life in politics, no one gets an easy ride.

If she didn’t want to answer, why not tell them to contact the media spokesperson for her office (if they have one ) or have her office address it in a press release, but to threaten harassment charges cause she doesn’t want to answer on behalf of her office since she is the top dog their so to speak is a joke.

Obviously she isn’t very familiar with abuse of power that some politicians get in trouble for , which I think is where she is headed here. If she can not handle the heat then go get a job doing something else where your not in charge and your not the person who has to answer for your department.

Tjat Guy says:

Just Like Rob Ford

I lived in Toronto and followed the Rob Ford saga with the Toronto Star. He had a tiff with the publication since they reported a physics altercation between him and a high school football player he was a coach for. It never happened, even the football player kid said the Star was wrong. Ford asked for an apology and they didn’t give one. So he black balled them and only met and responded to all the other publications. The Star went out of their way to find SOMETHING of a smoking gun then the crack pipe issue showed up. There are a number of city councillors who quickly shut up and stayed in the shadows to avoid the spotlight because they have just as bad or worse habits they didn’t want a spotlight on. Ie, the new mayor for one. Ford mow has a fight for his life with cancer, so its immoral to beat on him now.

Anonymous Coward says:

Dear Ms Terri Griffiths, ESQ...

I write to you to let you know that there are quite a number of ways to block calls from people who annoy you. I refer you to this Wiki-how article…

Lastly, may I recommend asking your phone service provider to assign you a different number? I realize that letting all your friends and coworkers know you have a different number may be bothersome, but you seem excessively agitated about the calls you are receiving to your current number. You might even consider relegating your current phone to be a “work cell phone”, and simply not answer it after hours, or when you see the caller is not a co-worker.


Internet Bystander

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Plenty of women in administrative and executive positions are able to do their jobs even with PMS

Even if it means in extreme cases that they recognize and go manage it as if it were any other severe medical condition (migraines are managed similarly).

So I’d think Griffiths would be able to conduct herself appropriately, despite personal circumstances.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Plenty of women in administrative and executive positions are able to do their jobs even with PMS

I grant you that, and agree. However, I was married to a woman that turned into a fire breathing dragon two days prior to onset of menses and who thought she was being perfectly rational while being anything but. YMMV.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Plenty of women in administrative and executive positions are able to do their jobs even with PMS

Your wife’s unfortunate experience is not representative of the majority of women. Your extrapolation is no different than saying that all men are a hair-trigger away from violent rage because you had a friend with poor impulse control.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Huh, isn’t her job to do that whole truth, justice, American way thing?
If she feels unable to handle the stress of being in this position, perhaps she would be better suited to find other employment.

This behavior is unacceptable, and if she wants to remove any public oversight over what she is doing (and reporters covering news is public oversight) perhaps her office should be investigated.

In fact this should be the response to any appointed/elected offical who responds in this manner. They are accountable to the public they represent, and if they are unwilling to be accountable… where there is smoke there is fire.

I’m loathe to suggest more laws, because they will always add more loopholes, but it is time this stop being acceptable and those unfit to hold positions be removed.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...