Vermont's Automatic License Plate Readers: 7.9 Million Plates Captured, Five Crimes Solved

from the the-finest-in-haystacking-technology dept

The sales pitch for automatic license plate readers is how great they are at helping cops solve crimes. From hunting down stolen cars to tracking pedophiles across jurisdictions, ALPRs supposedly make policing a breeze by gathering millions of time/date/location records every single day and making it all available to any law enforcement agency willing to buy the software and pay the licensing fees.

The systems come with civil liberties baggage — privacy issues that aren’t completely articulable, at least not in terms of what the courts have held to contain sufficient expectations of privacy. A single photo of a car on a public road isn’t a privacy violation. But what about dozens or hundreds of photos that more resemble a passive tracking system than a set of public snapshots? That’s a bit more of a gray area — one that hasn’t been fully explored by the courts at this point. Adjacent decisions notwithstanding, ALPRs are mildly intrusive and have troubling implications due to their capabilities, but at this point, they still operate within the confines of the Constitution.

So, if civil liberties are still intact, what’s the next point of attack? Maybe it’s the alleged efficiency. Are law enforcement agencies getting their money’s worth?

It’s a trick question. First and foremost, it’s the public’s money paying for these. In many cases, DHS grants have paid for ALPRs, with local agencies name-checking terrorism and extremism to increase the odds of obtaining funds. Even when paid for out-of-pocket, it’s still the public footing the bill.

The systems aren’t cheap. And from what VPR (NPR Vermont) has uncovered, they’re not really worth the expense. (via Digital Fourth)

Over the past five years, law enforcement agencies in Vermont have invested more than $1 million in technology that gathers millions of data points every year about the whereabouts of vehicles across the state.

Yet even with the millions of scans, the system has not led to many arrests or breakthroughs in major criminal investigations, and it hasn’t led to an increase in the number of tickets written for the offenses the technology is capable of detecting.

No one sells a city council (or the general public) on the wonders of ALPRs by highlighting how many unregistered vehicles might be ticketed or pointing out other mundane traffic enforcement benefits they might provide. Probably just as well, considering these systems have had no discernible effect in these areas.

It’s the “big ticket” crimes that sell ALPRs and push them past the complaints of those concerned about citizens’ privacy and civil liberties. Kidnapping, auto theft, child pornographers, terrorism, etc. These are the sort of thing that put lead in legislators’ collective pencils, stirring them to approve funding or sign off on grant requests, and so on. How do Vermont’s ALPRs stack up against capital-C “crime?”

In the 18 months leading up to Jan. 1, 2013, the 61 license plate readers operating in the state at the time did a lot of recording. A VPR study of public information from local, state and federal law enforcement showed that during that time period, police across the state logged 7.9 million license plates and stored them in a central, statewide database along with the time and location they were scanned.

Despite the financial investment in the systems, they were helpful in solving fewer than five crimes in 2013. The number of tickets written for driving with a suspended license and driving with an expired registration (two violations that ALPRs can detect) hasn’t gone up since the technology was introduced in mid-2009.

Millions of plates. Five (5) crimes solved. Number of tickets issued flat.

So, what do you do? As a legislator who approved funding for this, do you accept this as part of the learning curve or do you demand more from the technology? Do you tell the public, “We appreciate your input but feel that a literal handful of successful criminal investigations far outweighs any privacy issues or budgetary concerns”?

An interview with an officer who uses the ALPR system adds some nuance to the discussion, including the fact that law enforcement’s civil liberties precautions contribute to the perceived inefficiency of the system. But underneath it all, it’s viewed as just another “tool” for local law enforcement to use, albeit one that can’t seem to pull its own weight. No one wants to say the equipment is non-essential or possibly redundant, but the officer interviewed (Sergeant Cram) makes this damning statement.

Despite the $25,000 tool, Cram says the majority of the Winooski Police Department’s traffic stops are still done the old-fashioned way, with officers stopping drivers for infractions like rolling through a stop sign or failing to yield at a crosswalk.

Still, Cram says the federally-funded ALPR is a valuable tool, even though he doesn’t think the city would have put up $25,000 of its own money to buy one.

The city wouldn’t have ended up with one if the DHS wasn’t giving them away. That’s how extraneous this “tool” is. The lack of successful criminal investigations backs this up. The fact that traffic enforcement has remained stagnant even with the addition of several million plate scans per year is the final nail in the coffin.

No one — at least not in Vermont — needs this technology. But if someone else is willing to pay, they’ll take it. And they’ll use it. And years down the road, they’ll likely still have nothing to show for it but a massive database tracking the movement of millions of non-criminals.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Vermont's Automatic License Plate Readers: 7.9 Million Plates Captured, Five Crimes Solved”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Traffic violations can make your issuance rates go up. I’ve had to fight off 5 tickets this year because of bogus tickets being slapped on my car.

For example, I was parked in one place that was clearly marked as a no parking zone from the hours of 7am-9am yet I got ticketed even though I parked there at around 11am. It was even noted on the ticket that it was issued between the hours of 11am-12pm. Yet they expect me to play stupid and pay up?

I don’t think so!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

I haven’t needed to in quite some time so things may have changed, but up here in Canada we have what’s called the Crown Procescutor. When you’re going up for a ticket in court and have compelling evidence to fight your case you can bring it in front the the crown prosecutor (basically a meeting in an office) and they will likely compromise for you or throw your ticket out.

This practice was brought forth to keep court cases down to only the one that really needed to be heard before a judge and keeping mistakes or things that can be logically talked out from seeing court and clogging the system/time/money of everyone.

Anonymous Coward says:

How long until the license plate reader database is cross-referenced with the vehicles belonging to individuals who are considered to likely be carrying large amounts of cash in order to enable law enforcement to conduct a random stop and happen upon some assets to seize, you know, because of drug-trafficking terrorist child pornography!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

They don’t need that. There’s a little thing called Civil Forfeitures which basically allows cops to place anything you own under arrest…including your couch.

I know it sounds out-landish, but it’s affecting over 60 thousand people per year all of which who have not been convicted of a crime. In other words, a cop has the legal authority to rob you fucking blind without due process.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

That’s actually exactly what I was referring to. I’m suggesting that the police might at some point try to use the license plate database to specifically target those likely to be carrying large amounts of cash for the purposes of civil forfeiture, rather than having to stop random people and guess who might be likely to carry large amounts of cash.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Sharing is Caring

I love this quote from the app description:

“All LPR data acquired by the NVLS Mobile Companion may be shared with 10’s of thousands of already registered and active Law Enforcement NVLS users. The NVLS network of LPR based information sharing has proven to be impactful for thousands of LEAs and LEOs across the country.”

How about an app just for tracking law enforcement license plates?

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

‘But New London police interviewed only candidates who scored 20 to 27, on the theory that those who scored too high could get bored with police work and leave soon after undergoing costly training.

Wait, that’s the excuse they use, ‘they might get bored and leave’? Seriously? That would be ridiculously easy to deal with, just set a cost for the training, and then have each month/year of employment with the police count towards paying that back. If they stay employed long enough(5 years perhaps), then the officer breaks even, and can leave if they want without paying anything. If they leave before that for another job, then they have to pay off what’s left.

Voila, no risk of someone taking advantage of free training to pad their resume and leaving right afterwards.

Honestly, they might as well come out with the actual reason, that they don’t want to employ anyone smart enough that they might start asking questions, leave the laughable excuses at home.

Jablonski says:

It’s not the LPRs on their own that are bad, although that is bad enough. It’s that commercial services are aggregating the LPR data and selling that to cops. So while one jurisdiction may have some record of your presence, all they need to do is pay a nominal fee to be able to track you (albeit still in patchwork fashion) around all the jurisdictions.

GEMont (profile) says:

Welcome to Amerika - the Home of the Watched

“…a massive database tracking the movement of millions of non-criminals”

And that is the actual purpose of the devices, in a nut-shell.

Run together with all the other databases from other units across Amerika, it gives somebody a really nice computer generated panorama of where everyone goes, when and for how long, every day.

The blackmail possibilities alone would pay for the equipment in five years… had the AIP actually paid for it out of their own pocket, instead of making taxpayer’s foot the bill as usual.

AIP = Assholes In Power

And don’t get me wrong, this is indeed being done specifically for security purposes.

The security of the 1% that is.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...