President Obama Says He's Against Fast Lanes On The Internet, But FCC Proposal Would Allow Them

from the time-to-call-mr.-wheeler dept

In some comments at the US Africa Leaders Summit in DC yesterday, President Obama claimed that he’s absolutely against fast lanes and slow lanes on the internet — which is pretty interesting given that his own FCC appears to be poised to allow exactly that:

Net neutrality in the United States — one of the issues around net neutrality is whether you are creating different rates or charges for different content providers.

That’s the big controversy here.

You have big, wealthy media companies who might be willing to pay more and also charge more for spectrum, more bandwidth on the Internet so they can stream movies faster.

I personally, the position of my administration, as well as a lot of the companies here, is that you don?t want to start getting a differentiation in how accessible the Internet is to different users.

You want to leave it open so the next Google and the next Facebook can succeed

Again, the current proposal from the FCC would actually allow just that. Of course, prepared remarks like these are carefully scoured by White House staff, so this isn’t an offhand remark. As with Harry Reid’s recent statements, it’s entirely possible that this statement is a public nod towards Title II reclassification — something that Wheeler has previously suggested there wasn’t enough political support for. But if powerful Senators and the President are standing behind blocking fast and slow lanes, it certainly seems like the “there isn’t political support” argument is quickly disappearing.

This certainly doesn’t make it a done deal by any stretch of the imagination, but there is reason to believe that Wheeler has been using this comment period to see if there really would be political support for recassification. It’s increasingly looking like there is — and it’s going to be up to Wheeler to see if he’s willing to be a true leader and make the right call for how to protect an open and free internet, rather than the “easy” call.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “President Obama Says He's Against Fast Lanes On The Internet, But FCC Proposal Would Allow Them”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
25 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

You have big, wealthy media companies who might be willing to pay more and also charge more for spectrum, more bandwidth on the Internet so they can stream movies faster.

Willing , that’s laughable more like they were extorted ” an or else ”

He needs to fire Wheeler and get someone in there that will actually take the position that it’s the American people they’re working for we still need a push to take the lobby out of politics , that is the main issue and topic or else loopholes will be created no matter what the rules .

jackn says:

Re: Re:

“He needs to fire Wheeler and get someone in there that will actually take the position that it’s the American people they’re working for …”

Sorry, it has been sold. Wheeler and obama are doing exactly what they were paid to do. and that is, give the appearance of ‘hope,’ but of course, the end state is known all along, and progress is towards the desires of big media.

Anonymous Howard (profile) says:

Re: Re:

It’s a wonder they do not get dizzy from all that spinning.

Lanes should not exist period.

An electricity company do not decide if you should use your purchased electricity to watch TV, vacuum clean (“normal lane”) or use induction welders (“fast lane”) as long as you pay for the electricity. The same applies to ISP: as long as you pay for x bandwidth, they do not get a say in what you’re use that for.

Anonymous Coward says:

all Obama is trying to do here is pass the buck. when things go shit-shaped and the FCC under Wheeler, introduces different broadband speeds so that those who can pay more will get a faster/better service, allowing them to charge more, he can say he was against it. if he was that bothered, he wouldn’t have put Wheeler in charge of the FCC to begin with. this was done intentionally, knowing what was going to happen and give Wheeler all the blame. if Obama was truly interested in preventing different speed connections, he should prevent it, not just say ‘i’m Mr Sqeaky Clean. i didn’t want it, it was all his doing’! that is not a good way to get confidence from the people!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Be aware how he is framing his comment:
The essence is to protect small businesses from getting a higher entry-to-market costs. He doesn’t specifically mention users.

The gist seems to be to allow throttling a.la. “network optimization”. I am certainly interested in his take on the model used by Netflix in this context. If both user throttling and a cooperative network optimization like what Netflix does is allowed, I would say the hole for having a combination thereof is wide open. The last step would be to sell packages with or without throttling based on the bitrates and other technical numbers to distinguish “the right services” and we have a complete circumvention.

Anonymous Coward says:

'this was done intentionally, knowing what was going to happen and give Wheeler all the blamev'

Oh, I don’t know that this would be all that bad. Personally, I would be pleased to see a former-lobbyist-now-regulator tossed under the nearest available bus. Certainly might help prevent more government posts for such a person in the future, and as a bonus might puncture the current lobbyists’ balloon that leaves them believing in their own invulnerability.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: 'this was done intentionally, knowing what was going to happen and give Wheeler all the blamev'

Get tossed under the public bus only to escaping into a manhole and pop up in the lobby’s ceo chair, Wheeler doesn’t care , this whole thing is smoke and mirrors. he’ll come out with millions in money acquired from his buddys and we’ll be standing like a deer in the headlights of that same bus .

Rocco Maglio (profile) says:

Obama does not do difficult decisions

Obama does not do difficult decisions. He answers yes and no. He takes action, but is not responsible for the action since he was forced to do it, because of some other circumstances. He doesn’t take action, but that is because it was someone else’s fault. He is not into solutions since there is responsibility associated with that. He prefers to play the blame game. He would not be a great person to work with.

Rekrul says:

As with Harry Reid’s recent statements, it’s entirely possible that this statement is a public nod towards Title II reclassification — something that Wheeler has previously suggested there wasn’t enough political support for.

Or Obama is just telling people what they want to hear, like he’s been doing since first campaigning to become president…

GEMont (profile) says:

...nothing up my other sleeve....

…. and then again, Mister Obama might have, you know, just sort of, you know, lied once again, in order to make everyone think he was on their side and not giving the go- ahead to his corporate buddies to start charging for fast lanes on the web and all that…. as usual.

I mean, its not like he hasn’t done the same sort of thing in the past…. repeatedly.

Personally, if it comes out of his mouth, I’d give it about a 10% chance to be even partially true. I mean hell, he was hired by Wall Street because he can sell shit as shinola better than anyone else they interviewed for the job.

But if its about something that Corporate America holds near and dear to its heart, I’d assume its 100% pure bovine fecal matter, delivered as usual, on a silver palate.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
08:56 AT&T, Comcast Dramatically Cut Network Spending Despite Net Neutrality Repeal (16)
06:18 Ajit Pai Hits CES... To Make Up Some Shit About Net Neutrality (24)
More arrow