John Oliver: Stop Calling It Net Neutrality; It's 'Preventing Cable Company F**kery'

from the a-bit-more-on-target dept

In last night’s John Oliver show (technically “Last Week Tonight”), his “top story” was all about net neutrality. This is both surprising (because the issue has received little mainstream attention) and awesome, because it needs much more mainstream attention.

Not surprisingly, it’s both insightful and hilariously funny. He mocks how the FCC has made the issue sound incredibly boring. He mocks telco industry lawyers claiming it’s “not about fast lanes and slow lanes” but “fast lanes and hyperspeed lines.” Oliver summarized that quote simply as “bullshit.” He shows this graphic of Netflix’s speed on Comcast before and after it agreed to pay up, and directly compares it to a mafia shakedown. He highlights how the broadband companies (though he unfortunately lumps telco companies in as “cable companies”) have basically bought off Washington DC, amusingly comparing an FCC run by a former lobbyist regulating the cable industry to an Australian couple hiring a dingo to babysit.

And, finally, he has an amusing call to action for “internet commenters” who he suggests have been training their whole lives for this moment, when the FCC has asked people for comments on its proposal. It’s just too bad he pointed them directly at the confusing FCC.gov site, rather than the EFF’s much better interface at DearFCC.org.

Either way, it’s great to see Oliver take on this issue in an amusing way — and hopefully it will spur more people to speak up on the issue.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: at&t, comcast, time warner cable, verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “John Oliver: Stop Calling It Net Neutrality; It's 'Preventing Cable Company F**kery'”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
37 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Looks like they may be getting swamped. This is the link now.

Hibernate operation: Cannot open connection; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [???]; SQL state [null]; error code [0]; weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceLimitException: No resources currently available in pool ecfs to allocate to applications, please increase the size of the pool and retry..; nested exception is weblogic.jdbc.extensions.PoolLimitSQLException: weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceLimitException: No resources currently available in pool ecfs to allocate to applications, please increase the size of the pool and retry

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Looks like they may be getting swamped. This is the link now.

I’d say that was very much on purpose. A design feature, not a failure.

During the hot topic time, all those people don’t get heard. As soon as the heat of passion dies down and the lines go back to normal, they can surface and report far, far, fewer people had an issue with this change the FCC wants. See?? No problem at all.

And here is the government office in charge of broadcast, public utilities, and communications, unable to serve the needs of it’s own customers. How friggin’ convenient.

Anonymous Coward says:

since when has a former employee of any industry become the head of an industry/company and NOT leaned heavily in the favorable direction of his former employees? apart from showing exactly what was wanted by the industries concerned, and those wants coming to fruition, it shows as well exactly who is pulling Obama’s chains, and why Wheeler got the job!! with the number of mails, complaints, suggestions and fears of what was going to happen if he went the way he wanted, Wheeler then ignored everything and everyone, preferring to still go down the road he had every intention of traveling all along! looking at things from the other side, which seems to have died a death since it happened, is the ruling that came down to remove net neutrality in the first place. it certainly makes me extremely suspicious that this whole debacle was an elaborate set up from the beginning!!

R.H. (profile) says:

Re: Conflict of Interest

The problem there is called ‘regulatory capture’. The majority of the people interested and qualified for the regulatory jobs are people who either worked in the industry before or people who the industry would, even without the government job on their resum?, be interested in hiring. After an agency has existed for a few years, many of its members will be former members of the regulated industry.

It’s a problem but, unless the government tries to prohibit individuals from taking certain jobs after their government service is complete (which would be of questionable legality), I don’t know how to fix the issue.

David says:

Cannot open connection

Conveniently, the FCC site is lovely down. No can comment, Tarzan. It’s not like the FCC is going to pay attention anyway. There’s a history of this sort of thing. It’s Thank You For Your Comments (those of you who got through), now we’ll get on with what we were planning to do all along.

Maybe there’s some hope. Maybe if there’s enough flood, they can’t ignore it. But they don’t have an incentive to increase the capacity of their system. They know this direction doesn’t serve the customers, the people, the startups, etc. Exactly the point.

GMacGuffin (profile) says:

Cox Cable Apparently Clueless

/* begin bitching
*/

I was surprised last week to get an email from my broadband provider Cox telling me that for an extra $5/month I can get even faster broadband! Yay.

I’m already paying an extra $10/month for “Premium” access but I checked it out anyway. The new offer is really about $10-12 more per month (liars), and offers download speeds of ‘up to’ 50Mbps (I had routers in 1999 that could handle more than that).

I was too put out to determine whether they are slowing down my Premium speeds, or just offering a third tier of even higher not-very-fast speeds for a higher, misrepresented sum.

Other broadband options available?: None to speak of.

In light of current issues – tackiness threshhold has been surpassed.

/* end bitch
*/

Asok says:

The call to use fcc.gov/comments is worse than useless. It makes people think they are doing something useful. But the FCC can Tom Wheeler can just easily ignore them.

Use the old fashioned telephone. Talk to the FCC. Tie up their phone lines. Much more useful than making comments on their website.

Use the script here: http://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/25pltx/online_petition_to_remove_tom_wheeler_as_chairman/chjimuq

Mike Masnick (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The call to use fcc.gov/comments is worse than useless. It makes people think they are doing something useful. But the FCC can Tom Wheeler can just easily ignore them.

I disagree. The comment period matters tremendously. There’s a political game being played here. There is a very decent chance that Wheeler is actually interested in reclassification, but knows it’s politically untenable. If the FCC is ABSOLUTELY FLOODED with pro-reclassification comments, he can turn around and make the political argument that the public absolutely wants it.

i.e., the comment period is an opportunity to give him political cover to make the politically untenable… tenable.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I agree. It’s like SOPA. All the politicians took all the lobbying money and thought everything was just going to sail right through like business as usual, until the public showed up and told them to hold the phone. Then they couldn’t drop support for it fast enough. Same thing. Lot’s of commentary, loud and often, can make a difference.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

What Lars said. There is no substantial backlash against any of those things. There was substantial backlash against the war, but it was counterbalanced by the unprecedented propaganda campaign that fired up the extreme, violent nationalists in the US. Even there, though, you can see their fear by looking at the amount of time, effort, and lying that went into countering the opinion.

JohnG (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

but classifying broadband to a public utility won’t fix the underlying issue – regional monopolies which largely prevent competition.

If Comcast had a serious competitor or two in areas you’d see that if they started shaking down Netflix or throttling them, their competitor could use such actions in their own marketing to steal customers. There you go – problem solved without additional government

Ingrid Phillips says:

Re: Solution to Internet's High Cost

Hi ~ I was looking for a tweet from a tech person who put a name (can’t find it) to using ? (something) instead of paying high prices for cable. Don’t want to go to DSL & haven’t had luck w/DirectTV. Remember those horrible days of dialup. I have a VOIP w/ooma (not premium) so don’t pay for any long distance calling.
Thanks for your insights,
ingy59

skeptacular (profile) says:

Fuckery

Hello, I am a professional fucker. With merely some earthy malfeasance and a fucker’s wheel, I create fakery with my own two hands. Useful around the house, yet praised as fine art too, fuckery is really coming into its own in the 21st Century, and I’m here to teach you how you can make fine fuckery too. For pleasure, commerce, or to make your own statement, learn fuckery and you can call yourself a fucker too!

Jerry Hall (profile) says:

Net Neutrality FCC comment section broken/down/Useless?

Um, why is each link on the FCC page broken – when one is trying to comment on the Net Neutrality measure?

Well, that’s if you got past not including the www will take you to a broken link as well (i.e. fcc.gov/comments doesn’t work).

Try these links:

http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/begin?procName=14-28&filedFrom=X
http://www.fcc.gov/comments
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/execute?proceeding=14-28

Strange?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
More arrow