Voltage Pictures Both Wins And Loses In Canadian Copyright Troll Attempt

from the remind-me-not-to-watch-your-films dept

You might remember how Voltage Pictures, creators of The Hurt Locker, was the first studio in the United States to really try to take a stab at copyright trolling, suing large numbers of purported P2P copyright violators en masse. Despite struggles with this approach the company has proven persistent, with Voltage boss Nicolas Chartier insisting that anybody that criticizes his company’s approach to business is a “moron and a thief.” The company recently scaled down their efforts slightly, earlier this month filing a lawsuit against 31 anonymous people for using BitTorrent to obtain their latest film, Dallas Buyers Club.

After spreading such love and joy in the States, the company turned its sights on Canada in late 2012, where they took specific aim at a small independent ISP by the name of TekSavvy. Over the weekend, a Canadian court ruled that TekSavvy would have to hand over the personal data of roughly 2,000 customers who obtained copies of Voltage films via BitTorrent. Those users can now look forward to “settlement-o-matic” letters from Voltage demanding anything from $100 to $5,000 under Canada’s federal Copyright Act.

While the court did feel bound by precedent to allow the release of user names, Judge Kevin Aalto at least recognized the hazards of copyright trolling, including numerous safeguards such as the requirement that Voltage have the precise wording of these letters signed off on by the court before they get sent to end users:

“In order to ensure there is no inappropriate language in any demand letter sent to the alleged infringers, the draft demand letter will be provided to the court for review,” Aalto wrote. “Any correspondence sent by Voltage to any subscriber shall clearly state in bold type that no court has yet made a determination that such subscriber has infringed or is liable in any way for payment of damages.”

The court also required that any subscriber must be able to request a full copy of the Judge’s order, which Voltage will have to pay for. TekSavvy’s legal bills must also be paid in full before any information is exchanged, and Voltage is prohibited from exposing any of the data to the media, or putting it to use for “other purposes.” All told, under Canadian law it may not make financial sense for Voltage to pursue this further. Canadian law professor Michael Geist does a nice job showing how being a copyright troll in Canada isn’t going to be worth the expense:

“Even if Voltage were successful in convincing a court to award ten times the marketplace value of a $15 movie – $150 – the economics do not make sense. Assuming Voltage manages to convince 75% of recipients to settle for the $150 demand, the campaign would generate $225,000 in revenue. Yet that must be offset by paying the TekSavvy costs before any names are released (which alone were estimated at $200,000 at the federal court hearing), covering their own costs (assume a matching $200,000 to collect the IP addresses, retain experts, and fund the litigation), and dealing with thousands of demand letter recipients (if each letter costs $30 in time and money that adds another $45,000).”

Between the restrictions prohibiting Voltage from using their usual scare tactics in the letters and the high costs of pursuing things further, it doesn’t look like Voltage is going to have much fun during their visit north of the border after all.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: teksavvy, voltage pictures

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Voltage Pictures Both Wins And Loses In Canadian Copyright Troll Attempt”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

ironically capping damages at 5k may be one of the only useful things the harper government has done (maybe there are a few more if you look hard enough)

I assume this means Voltage will seek the 5k max since $150 won’t cover it, they may try extra hard instead of giving up because they can’t quit now, they put too much into it already. I expect 1-2k will be the demand, if $500 is the break even point

Moron Detector says:

“anybody that criticizes his company’s approach to business is a “moron and a thief”.”

This statement is ample evidence that the moron is in fact Voltage boss Nicolas Chartier.

It is possible that certain criticisms might be indicative of moronic behavior, however there is nothing there at all that even comes close to being related to thievery.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Uh, why are they called trolls?

Yeah, the whole ‘victim’ thing, when talking about companies like this goes right out the window as soon as it becomes clear that they don’t care in the slightest about finding the actual downloaders, proving it in a court of law, and having a reasonable fine applied as punishment, but rather prefer to just get as many names as they can, and sending out letters to threaten people with massive fines and court fees unless they pay a ‘settlement’, completely ignoring the guilt or innocence of their targets.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Uh, why are they called trolls?

I agree, “troll” is an inaccurate term.

These people are attempting to intimidate innocent people into complying with their demands. This is undisputable.

There’s another word that both begins and ends with “T” that’s far more accurate, pretty sure, like their claims, there’s at least one “error” in there too…

mattshow (profile) says:

For those who don’t read the actual judgment, part of this is due to the intervention of CIPPIC (www.cippic.ca). They’re a Canadian legal clinic connected to the University of Ottawa law school who do some work similar to that done by the EFF in the US. They were granted intervenor status in this litigation and argued strongly and persuasively that the privacy rights of the TekSavvy subscribers had to be respected, and that the judge should be careful not to open the door to US style copyright trolling in Canada.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Nope — the Pirate Levy means that you can copy digital audio from someone else’s read-only digital media for your own use — copying your own digital media and sharing it with others is still illegal, as is copying someone else’s digital media if it’s not audio.

Although in reality, I think that digital video rights holders should go try and collect damages from the CRIA, as they’re the ones collecting the money on recordable digital media.

ike says:

Incorrect titles named in Techdirt article

a Canadian court ruled that TekSavvy would have to hand over the personal data of roughly 2,000 customers who obtained copies of Voltage films The Hurt Locker,” “Dallas Buyers Club,” and “Don Jon.”

That’s incorrect. None of those titles are covered by the case in question. See page 9 of http://www.teksavvy.com/Media/Default/Customer%20Notices/T-2058-12%20-%20Statement%20of%20Claim.pdf for the titles in question.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...