Ridiculous: SEC Boss Refused To Move Forward On Required Crowdfunding Rules To Protect Her 'Legacy'

from the her-legacy-is-a-joke dept

Earlier this year, the JOBS Act passed Congress with widespread bipartisan support, and was signed into law by the President. There were a few different pieces involved, but one that got plenty of attention was the opening up of crowdfunding for equity (i.e., owning actual shares in a company). In the US, you can’t do a crowdfunding campaign that results in giving ownership in the company. Until the JOBS Act passed, that was considered a form of a public offering, which is a highly regulated area, in which you have to file all sorts of documents with the SEC, get an underwriter, go on a road show, all that fun stuff. But for smaller businesses looking to raise some money, this doesn’t make much sense. The JOBS Act opened up a small sliver of space in which smaller companies could raise a little bit of money in exchange for equity. The SEC actively opposed the whole thing from the beginning, but once the bill was law, it was also tasked with setting up the rules for how it would work to limit possible fraud.

Back in August, we noted that the SEC’s rules were due out any day, but had been pushed back at least a week as various state regulators argued that the whole thing was just going to be used for massive scamming. Since then the whole process has been fought over and changed numerous times. Newly released emails suggest that it wasn’t because the SEC was struggling with setting the best rules possible… but because SEC boss Mary Schapiro was worried about her legacy. She’s leaving the position in two weeks and apparently didn’t want to put in place strict rules for fear that it would tarnish her reputation as being “pro-investor.”

“I don’t want to be tagged with an anti-investor legacy,” Schapiro wrote in an e-mail to [Corporation Finance Director Meredith] Cross with the subject line “Please don’t forward.”

“In light of all that’s been accomplished, that wouldn’t be fair, but it is what will be said …”

Whether or not you think the rules are good or bad, we should have SEC commissioners who focus on doing what’s right… now how things are going to look on their resume when they go hunting for a job in the industry after leaving public service.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Ridiculous: SEC Boss Refused To Move Forward On Required Crowdfunding Rules To Protect Her 'Legacy'”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
out_of_the_blue says:

"just going to be used for massive scamming."

You skipped right over her real reason: “anti-investor” in DC’s bizarro-world usage means “pro-scammer”. That’s sure to be important to people who’d hire her.

More seriously, if the SEC were doing its job, half of Wall Street and Chicago Mercs would be in jail, and the rest awaiting trial.

BTW: more lousily written than usual, your point, if any, is obscured.

Is anyone here really certain that Mike “Streisand Effect” Masnick…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Doesn’t get a little thrill every time I post this link?

Anonymous Coward says:

Well … maybe she doesn’t want to rush these rules by too quickly only to have the next person pick up the tab. Perhaps it’s possible they want the next person to set the rules that s/he will have to work with for the rest of his term and to take his time to ensure rules that make sense and to perhaps adjust them during his or her term. Two weeks really isn’t a lot of time to set sensible rules and allow for public input, is it?

Anonymous Coward says:

this is the type of person that is in loads of high power positions. their interest is with them self, first, second, last, not with the position they hold or the effects their decisions have on everyone else. when she leaves, companies will be falling over each other to get her. hopefully, whoever gets her will learn before it’s too late to correct!

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Who needs Wikileaks?
Just grep all the mails with subject line of do not forward and we’ll have a treasure trove of many bad acts and stupid behavior.

Your “Legacy” is more important that actually doing your job, I’d like back all of your pay for the time you failed to carry out your job and end any benefit package you have from it.
Stupid needs to hurt, and taking away the money seems to be a really good tool to make them hurt.

Imagine how fast we’d avoid the fiscal cliff if we cut off Congress’s benefits and pay until they actually did their job.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...