Hide Techdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

Russia Wants To Ban Children From Using WiFi

from the with-liability-on-the-wifi-owner dept

Ah, Russia. Officials in the Federal Mass Media Inspection Service (?!?) are considering a plan to ban children from using WiFi — and would enforce the ban by holding the hotspot owners liable if anyone under 18 got on their networks. Seriously.

The Communications and Press Ministry has proposed banning children from using Wi-Fi networks in public, potentially making cafes, restaurants and other locations providing the service responsible for enforcing the law.

Why? For the children, of course! They claim it’s related to Russia’s new internet censorship law, which they’re afraid will be circumvented by kids at the local coffee shop or restaurant. Not surprisingly, various places that offer WiFi are not happy about this, pointing out that they have no way of making sure that teens don’t get on their WiFi. That doesn’t seem likely to stop moralizing bureaucrats (with a healthy appreciation for the ability to censor) from moving forward with this plan.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Russia Wants To Ban Children From Using WiFi”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Ninja (profile) says:

But that’s fairly easy. Make it mandatory by law for people to register users with their real IDs (for proper identification) in a Governmental site that will communicate to the open wi-fi out there if the user is below 18.

Yeah, it can be insanely abused and the Russian Govt is known for abusing their power against their citizens but hey, it’s for the children! If you don’t support it you certainly are a pedophile.

Michael (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The US government already had this idea. They are just waiting for a forward-thinking country like Russia to show how it can be implemented. That way we can point at it and say:

“Hey look! Those Russians are protecting their children better than we are! We need to implement a STRONGER law. Perhaps we can have the shop owners police their Wifi networks AND pay the MPAA a tax for…well…something…”

Michael (profile) says:

Movie idea!

I’ve got it!

I’m writing a script in which Russians parachute into a small mid-western US town and take over all of the Wi-Fi hotspots.
A small group of high school kids that were hanging out in a coffee shop with their iPads will escape the initial drop and run into the hills.
Once there, they will attack the Russians and steal routers and cell phones and build a number of hotspots that the Russians will keep trying to find and destroy.

I will call it ‘Magenta Morning’.

Jeremy says:

I'm very confused how this is supposed to protect them

Is access to open wifi supposed to prevent their ability to see whatever site they want? Clearly the people considering these laws know nothing about what it’s like to grow up with the internet. As a kid, you can get away with anything on the internet, period. There is ultimately no supervision possible because there are simply too many ways around any blockage.

Anonymous Coward says:

“ointing out that they have no way of making sure that teens don’t get on their WiFi”

Sure the do. Issue hour long passes with a user / pass configuration, and only give them out at the cash based on people who present ID. If that person then gives it to a child, it should be their problem.

It’s not hard to do. It’s the same process that generally keeps kids out of 18+ movies and adult bookstores.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Scenario: the oldest of the group (which should be 18) goes in and asks for access. Then gives access to the kids, which are far, far away (I’m thinking mall-wide Internet access).

Kids get internet. Will never get caught. Oldest guy probably will never get caught either.

It’s not that hard to do. It’s the same process that generally gets kids under 18 some booze (in my country, the legal age for drinking alcohol is 18).

Anonymous Coward says:

think about what democratic countries started this censoring, who started it, why it started and how it has gotten totally out of hand, then think how ridiculous those same democratic countries look when condemning the communist etc countries that censor. the reasons may have been different to begin with and be different now but the results are the same, prevent the public from doing things that certain old farts who wont enter the present day dont wont done! the sickest thing is that the main reason used is to ‘protect the children’. what absolute bollocks! this is only used because it is a headline grabber! the ‘children’ know more about getting round blocks and accessing censored sites than anyone else!!

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Stupid law, but stupid response

Not surprisingly, various places that offer WiFi are not happy about this, pointing out that they have no way of making sure that teens don’t get on their WiFi.

The law is stupid, but this response is equally so. Excepting for hackers, they certainly can make sure that teens don’t get on their WiFi, in exactly the same way that for-pay hotspots ensure that only those who are paying get on their WiFi.

Wally (profile) says:


If they were doing this to censor the Russian Porn Industry, the idea would be valid. Russia is one of the biggest producers of bot net advertising. They are also home to one of the best Internet security firms (Kerpesky anyone???) on the planet as a result.

The blockage of WiFi access to those under 18 may have been a bigger issue if the porn industry wasn’t so pervasive in web advertising in Russia. They don’t just use banner add’s, they use viruses and Malware to “advertise”/hustle people into buying their product.

Holding people responsible for having minors attached to their WiFi network is ludicrous. However, from what I gathered from a friend over in Russia, it only applies to businesses such as caf?’s and other public WiFi spots.

It should be noted that just because the language of the law is non-specific, that doesn’t mean the authorities are stupid enough there are stupid enough to try to enforce the issue without research.

Mike Manaick I do give you credit for pointing the issue out. It is a problem. I just see this as a simple fact that as US citizens, we are used to being treated poorly when such broad languages are applied to law. I see this as Russia letting its regions govern themselves on it.

Ninja (profile) says:

Re: Porn

It should be noted that just because the language of the law is non-specific, that doesn’t mean the authorities are stupid enough there are stupid enough to try to enforce the issue without research.

LOL! Good joke! Obviously there’s no example of Governments (or even people) abusing laws that are badly written with vague and broad definitions. Right. The Government promises this law will never be abused, please carry on with your ordinary lives.

Please, you can’t be that naive, can you?

Anonymous Coward says:

There is one small problem and that is WIFI SECURITY IS FUCKING WORTHLESS.. There is just simply too much information being transmitted back and fourth for their relatively low security. It makes it very easy to build a key in a short period of time.

Considering open as the internet is “the way it is meant to be” the information required to do so is easily acquired by even the most novice of users.

The smarter the world gets with technology does not necessarily mean that task well be harder because it will become common knowledge. These half baked laws to censor people will never work in the end.

hrosanna says:

Well, let’s see how well that ends up. People in various countries across the world have tried and failed miserably to do similar things to people all through history, and every one of them have crashed and burned with people laughing and dancing on their graves.
How in the world can they support it anyway??? Teens dont even have to sit inside of a cafe etc. to connect to WiFi, just nearby. It’s a ridiculous idea and i can’t wait to see it fail.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...