DailyDirt: Diamonds, With Lucy, In The Sky

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Carbon comes in several allotropes: graphene, diamond, nanotubes, buckyballs, nanofoam etc. Some forms are easier to manufacture than others, but someday we might have diamond-based semiconductors or diamond-based quantum computers. If you like shiny minerals, here are just a few interesting links on diamonds.

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Diamonds, With Lucy, In The Sky”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

The experimental quantum-grade diamond is 99.99 percent pure carbon 12 (DIAMOND), the most common isotope of the element. But the crystal also contains a small amount of the heavier isotope carbon 13 (NOT DIAMOND) as well as implanted nitrogen ions (NOT DIAMOND) that form defects in the diamond lattice known as nitrogen vacancy centers. Both impurities have certain quantum benefits.

So the qubits are not ‘stored in a diamond’ they are stored in Carbon 13 and nitrogen ions..

Consider a transistor in a plastic case, do you write that the transistor works because it is in a plastic case ?

“my computer works because the box it is housed in is metal !!”

Dont even bother to consider that “time” and qubits have a significantly different relationship to each other compared to ‘normal’ matter.

If something came be in two states (0 and 1) at any one time (superposition), then time itself ceases to be a significant factor. You simply cannot equate electronic computer concepts (like DRAM) to how a quantum computer could possibly operate.

You also might be able to store the state of a qubit over time, but you still need super cold equipment to read or write or ‘program’ information

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

That not to say that I dont think the work this group is doing is amazing, cutting edge, and possibly world changing work.

it’s all a part of the development of what hopefully will be increadable computing power, and work like that will or could make that possible sooner rather than later.

It’s just that TD’s take on it was flawed as usual..

Lawrence D'Oliveiro says:

Re: ?carbon 13 (NOT DIAMOND)?

Isotopes of carbon are still carbon, and still just as diamond-y. They occupy exactly the same positions in the tetrahedral diamond lattice as carbon 12. Chemically they are virtually identical.

Let?s put it this way: if living things can?t tell the difference between carbon 12, carbon 13 and carbon 14, why should a piece of rock?

Rekrul says:

Re: Re: No. Not true. Also, silly.

The main reason that rings are harder to take off than to put on is that the skin bunches up when you try to pull it off.

When you slide a ring on, the skin of your finger can’t move very much since it only goes from your fingertip down to the base. However when you try to pull the ring off, the skin can move quite a bit more, and ends up getting bunched up at the knuckle.

The solution for a stuck ring, in addition to using some kind of lubrication is to hold the skin taunt at the base of the finger while attempting to pull the ring off.

Rose M. Welch (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: No. Not true. Also, silly.

The solution for a stuck ring, in addition to using some kind of lubrication is to hold the skin taunt at the base of the finger while attempting to pull the ring off.

And on that note, please don’t use your spit if you’re going to hand the ring to someone else. That’s just disgusting. Also, you can draw the skin taunt by slightly bending your finger.

Rose M. Welch (profile) says:

Re: Re: No. Not true. Also, silly.

And if it gets stuck on your finger, it’ll be really hard to cut off without taking your finger with it….

Not slip off or take off. Cut off. Specifically.

I used to manage a fine jewelry store, and we had to remove stuck rings on a regular basis. Most took a special little saw tool. Others, such as tungsten bands and this ring, require a C-clamp. Easy and relatively painless.

Been there, done that.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...