DailyDirt: Who Cares About Moore's Law Anymore?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

The end of Moore’s law is basically here already, but it’s not such a surprise. It’s maybe more surprising that it’s lasted so long. What are we going to do now that our computers aren’t getting exponentially better? Try completely different ways of making computers, of course. Quantum computers are making some significant advances, even though they’re not ready to compete with regular silicon processors just yet. Here are just a few new quantum milestones that could lead to some re-thinking of encryption schemes and programming courses.

After you’ve finished checking out those links, take a look at our Daily Deals for cool gadgets and other awesome stuff.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Who Cares About Moore's Law Anymore?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
JoeCool (profile) says:

Re: Moore's Law

Most people don’t. They THINK is says SPEED will double every 18 months because that’s commonly what pundits spout on the news. The actual saying is that the DENSITY of circuits double every two years. While speed has plateaued lately, density is still improving nicely, so Moore’s law is still in no danger of ending.

Richard (profile) says:

Re: Re: Moore's Law

density is still improving nicely, so Moore’s law is still in no danger of ending.

But, without a similar increase in speed we have found it difficult to make use of the extra density – so practical performance has not improved to the same extent.

Also Vitanyi’s 1995 prediction for the inevitably 3kw laptop/heater by 2015 has not materialised and so we have definitely fallen short in some sense.

JoeCool (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Moore's Law

Actually, it’s been easy to make use of the extra density to improve performance. The extra density provides for more cores (multiprocessing has come a long way in the last decade, so we get more from more cores than we used to), larger caches (the BIGGEST improvement in performance you’ll find on any platform), and more pipes for CPUs and GPUs (especially big for GPUs).

Chronno S. Trigger (profile) says:

My dream...

That’s not a limitation of the hardware, it’s a limitation of software. Remember, they sent men to the moon with similar power to a calculator watch, but they did it without Start buttons or solitaire. Think about all the fancy your OS has and think about how much faster it would run without all that stuff that just looks pretty or you outright just don’t use.

Someone you know says:

My dream...

Um… I have just about the same setup only with an Samsung 950 pro m.4 HDD… 20 seconds from button press to desktop with no OS or BIOS tweaks. Adobe products launch in about 3-10 seconds. Smaller programs are up before my finger lifts from the click. How much faster do you want to get?

i7 5820k, ASUS x99, Radeon R9 390X, 256 Samsung 950 pro m.4

I know… we want a cerebral cortex interface so it knows what we want before we do. LOL.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...