DailyDirt: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Money can’t buy happiness, but if you have enough of it, you can get all kinds of publicity (whether or not you want it). Here are just a few folks that have been named on the various “these people are rich” lists.

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Butcherer79 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

I only asked the question, and it’s a registered charity so yes, I guess I do mean the “Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation”

Charity – Definition (from WordIQ.com)

Charity is a term in Christian theology (one of the three virtues), meaning loving kindness towards others; it is held to be the ultimate perfection of the human spirit, because it is said to both glorify and reflect the nature of God. In its most extreme form charity can be self-sacrificial. Charity is one conventional English translation of the Greek term agape.

Charity is the short form for charitable trust, a charitable foundation, or a corporation set up entirely for charitable purposes. These are set up for specific causes, such as curing diseases; providing goods or services for people or areas that lack them; nature conservation; and many others. In some countries (including the UK, Canada, Australia, and the United States) a charitable organization needs, by law, to register with the government. This is to reduce the possibilities of fraud and increase the opportunities for charities to receive tax breaks; it also indirectly allows the government to influence the scope and agenda of charities (e.g. RSPCA Told to Put Human Needs Before Animal Pain (http://www.webtribe.net/~animadversion/RSPCA%20put%20human%20needs.htm)).

Charity can also refer to the act of giving money, goods or time to such a charitable trust or other worthy cause.

In Greek Mythology, the Charites (note: not Charities, the proper plural of Charity) were the goddesses of charm, beauty, nature, human creativity and fertility; also better known as the Graces. See Charites.

Charity is also used as a forename.

I have no idea about whether or not the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is “for political causes disguised as charity” – I’m presuming not but then I’m sure I’ll be proven wrong by some know it all AC…
All this for what I thought was just a chuckle comment and a chance to tell the karma joke (VERY difficult to link in to most conversations), which, I might add, has been completely ignored – I will probably lose sleep now worrying about it all…..

FarSide (profile) says:

On the Buffett thing...

I’ve always kinda wondered about this, so the article was enlightening. However, to me the important caveat is the final paragraph of the analysis:

So when it comes to Buffett’s statement, there are two categories: the rich and the really rich. And the evidence tends to point to the conclusion that the really rich pay less in taxes as a percentage of income then their merely well-to-do counterparts — if their income comes primarily from investments. Overall, we rate Buffett’s statement True.

Which means he’s still paying a higher percentage than me.

80sRelic (profile) says:

PolitiFact is Anything BUT Non-Partisan!

“Politifact?s fact is nothing more than their left-wing hypothesis disconnected from and ignoring every data point that doesn?t help them make their case.”

– RedState: “PolitiFact Proves Yet Again It Is a Left Wing Attack Machine With Nonpartisan Veneer”: http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/08/26/politifact-proves-yet-again-it-is-a-left-wing-attack-machine-with-nonpartisan-veneer/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter


AgendaWise: “Politifact runs cover for Obama”: http://www.agendawise.com/2011/08/politifact-runs-cover-for-obama/?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...