Hide Techdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

UFC Claims Copyright On Video Of The Crowd At Its Events?

from the that-doesn't-seem-right dept

Rob points us to news about a fight that broke out in the audience at a UFC event in Toronto recently. Of course, we couldn’t care less about the fight itself, but what’s interesting is that the video of the fight in the audience has been taken down, due to a copyright claim from UFC:

At least for the time being, you can still see the video elsewhere, and I can’t see how UFC has any sort of reasonable copyright claim on it. Whoever took the video may have a copyright claim, but UFC? Perhaps it can make a weak argument that some of the audio in the background is UFC’s? But even then it seems like the claim is a huge stretch. Perhaps UFC thinks it automatically gets the copyright on anyone fighting on the premises? Once again, this seems like a case of copyright being used to censor content someone doesn’t want people to see/hear/read, rather than a legitimate use of copyright.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “UFC Claims Copyright On Video Of The Crowd At Its Events?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
19 Comments
G Thompson (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Which would even then due to case law regarding tickets, contracts, and articles of sale be voidable

And unless the person who had filmed the crowd was under an employee relationship (again highly unlikely) only THEY have ability to decide who can breach THEIR copyright.

Also if UFC try to state that it was THEIR crowd even that has no standing since it was full of humans, is absolutely not a static medium and can in no way be held as a copyrightable medium owned by a corporation.

Sean T Henry (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

It seems like UFC is making a bad mistake here. If they claim that they control the copyright over a fight that took place in the crowd and was filmed by someone in the crowd. Then it would be reasonable that they were endorsing an unsanctioned UFC fight at the event since they control everything going on in the arena.

This could possibly make it easier to open UFC to liability for any injuries caused at the event. The reason for this is because they treat the fight in the crowd just like they would if it was a sanctioned UFC fight but did not have signed wavers for the two crowd fighters.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I’m not sure what you’re referring to regarding voidable contracts.

The cameramen at the UFC event don’t necessarily have to be employees for UFC to have a claim. I’d be shocked if they didn’t have an agreement assigning whatever rights they may have to UFC.

As for a copyrightable medium, it’s not the humans that’s the medium; it’s the videotape (or hard drive, or whatever they’re recording on).

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Parent is correct. Occasionally other sporting leagues, including MLB, have attempted to enforce such claims. I’m not aware of any such claims being enforced by a court – usually it doesn’t go that far.

Of course, your license doesn’t actually have to be enforceable to provide a plausible basis for a DMCA takedown claim.

Not That Chris (profile) says:

Fight at UFC 91

The other interesting thing to note is that there appears to have been another fight at UFC 91 a few years ago that’s still readily available on YouTube. It seems to not be quite as nasty as the one at 129, but you can see the ring for a couple of seconds. But still, these videos have obviously been on YouTube for years now, so why the sudden change of heart on the most recent?

Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile) says:

Who you calling "we," Mike?

I’m very interested in the outcome of the “Fight Away from the Fight,” which will probably go down as one of the all-time great crowd fights.

Like “Zowitzki v. Nelson” during the Hagler-Hearns rematch, in which Nelson suckerpunched Zowitzki for “eyeballing” his girlfriend. Ralph “The Mouth” Zowitzki responded with something unprintable (mainly because it was unintelligible) before wrapping up Nelson in a very-ironic full nelson and pinning him to the very sticky floor.

At this point someone threw up, but various reports fail to say who. Possibly Nelson’s girlfriend, who was on her 5th and 7th Quaalude. Witnesses reported last seeing her “listing badly to starboard” before sinking entirely out of sight somewhere between the 3rd and 5th rows.

AWA says:

Perhaps It's a Contract Issue

I’m not sure if there are any terms applied by UFC on tickets to their events. But, if so, they could perhaps try to make a contract-based argument. Perhaps something like this: “as part of the terms of your buying a ticket and attending the event, you agree to forego recording anything happening in the venue and, should you decide to record anyway, you automatically assign the copyrights in all such recordings to UFC.” I’m just supposing here…

teka (profile) says:

everyone with the “maybe there was language on the back of the ticket..” defense that woulc allow UFC to claim ownership, back off that a little bit.

Just sticking some text on the back of something i hand you does not suddenly create a legal contract, else i could just as easily claim that “by reading, posting or otherwise attending a thread here on techdirt, hearafter known as “techdirt”, you are required to send 10% of your weekly earnings to me”

Venue owners and event creators just stick that stuff on there to cow you into following it. I have seen the same thing with security guards at galleries claiming “you have to delete that image from your camera or you will be arrested”

this is not to say that you could not be Ejected from an event for failing to listen to a guard/etc, but that is a different matter altogether

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...