Apparently BPL Isn't Quite Dead Yet

from the it-just-flinched! dept

For well over a decade, we’ve seen nothing useful come out of investments in broadband over powerlines. It’s been a money-sucking pit that has rarely worked particularly well, and never found many customers. The biggest and most hyped-up experiments failed pretty miserably, and just last month it seemed like we could officially declare BPL dead. Apparently, IBM did not get that memo, as it just invested nearly $10 million in a BPL offering for rural customers. We give them props for their optimism in a technology that has been nothing but trouble for years, but unless they’ve come up with something radically different than all those failed projects, we expect to be reading a story in another year or two about this project shutting down as well.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: ibm

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Apparently BPL Isn't Quite Dead Yet”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

“There’s also something to be said about repeatedly working on something that will fail”

(1) Trying with different approach/angle/perspective is much different than repeat attempt with similar approach; and (2) I don’t have an inside knowledge on what IBM plans to do – but saying that they WILL fail is a bit strong. Nothing is certain.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Very relevant point here. Just look at the digital photography field. Everyone went with the CCD sensor and Canon stuck with CMOS. Most everyone thought CCD was superior and CMOS was at the end of its technological rope. Well, I guess Nikon finally admitted defeat and is now building CMOS cameras.

Will BPL turn out the same way? Maybe not, but you never know until you try.

moe says:

BPL innovations?

In the article I read, the new startup has made some innovations over the previous technology. So when you say, “they’ve come up with something radically different than all those failed projects” — maybe they did just that.

I don’t ever envision BPL taking over Fiber/DSL/Cable, but it’s got to be viable for those areas that aren’t already serviced by broadband.

Siafu says:

I have been working with this technology for about 5 monthes now (albeit in a slightly different application), and can personally attest to the unreliability of such systems. In theory (from a technical standpoint, not necessarily an economical standpoint) it seems like a legitimate solution, but in practice if falls flat on it’s face. The biggest issues with this tech is dealing with noise on the powerline and the distance from endpoint to endpoint (more distance = less speed, unless you say to hell with connection reliability).

To #5: There is not a direct link between the computer and the main line through a modem like this (e.g. you aren’t just shoving two wires from your wall socket to your computer modem, though you can if you like!). Also, any credible piece of equipment has built in isolation.

Nothing beats a dedicated line.

Derek Kerton (profile) says:

All Over The Map

Here goes a comment where I’ll go all over the map.

I agree with Mike. BPL has, and probably always will, suck. It has been a boondoggle with FCC support for far too long.

I agree with comment #3 that says that, despite sucking, it’s good that some contrarians are pushing on. People said CDMA cellular wouldn’t work, the sound barrier couldn’t be crossed, and that man couldn’t fly. I think we’re better off that some would not listen to prevailing wisdom. Let them try, even though they will likely fail.

And regarding comment #5, you don’t seem to understand BPL. You don’t plug a modem into the mains (wall plug). The Internet signal carried by the high-voltage lines into neighborhoods can’t survive the step-down voltage converters. This is one of the weaknesses of BPL: every time the voltage steps down, the Internet signal must be taken out prior, and re-inserted after. In a neighborhood level, they take the signal out, and usually try to use Wi-Fi or some other last 200 yards solution (Wi-Fi has been popular). Of course, the net result is that BPL is a combination of “hops” across multiple dubious technologies. This doesn’t compare well to the simplicity of cable or DSL with a wire from your home straight to the CO.

another mike says:

bpl, futility, and other sisyphean efforts

on the other side of this is power over ethernet. where’s that one, huh?

we were going to do away with all the wall-warts and all our home and office networking gear, modems, routers, switches, print servers, etc., would power themselves off a POE injector instead of having to dedicate a power strip just to run the kit.

or wireless power. that was going to be how all your small appliances ran. a special platter mounted under a counter-top and just put the blender, can opener, toaster, even cell phones and other electronic devices, over the panel and it had power.

eh? says:

Bad publicity...

It seems like no one gives BPL a chance. I have used BPL and found it to be as good as cable, but the upload speeds weren’t capped so… better. The cable and dsl companies don’t really want affordable competition. They probably thought to themselves, “Hmm wow this looks bad for us, what should we do? Oh! I’ve got it! Let’s post trash and false reports about how bad BPL is – EVERYWHERE!”

Luke says:

Broadband over power line

I simply want to call attention to the real issues here. PLC/BPL, Smart Grid, triple-play, etc., etc., are all efforts to provide strong value added capabilities to the cost of service of electricity, high-speed internet, and wireless interconnectivity.

Edison struggled with everything from a better filament light bulb to Dynamos, direct current (DC) that were far from efficient, yet everybody saw the basic value proposition like with BPL.

Tesla came along and showed Edison a novel new approach to electricity generation and transmission. Alternating Current (AC), turned out to be the solution to many of the problems that Edison, et al., couldn’t comprehend. Remember, Nichola Tesla, did not have a formal education nor did he subscribe to the then current day opinions of his peers. Obviously, he (Tesla) was very helpful to the electric power industry and it’s emergence to the use of today.

The same old approach to data transmission, i.e., voltage modulation will eventually tire and new materials and electronic modulation approaches will take shape.

The most difficult thing really, is to have a non-biased debate where cable, telecoms, and electric-co’s special interest’s, are at least leveled on the playing field with the human family’s needs.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...