CBC Plans To BitTorrent Its Own TV Program

from the about-time... dept

Four years ago, we were among a group of folks talking about how the combination of BitTorrent and RSS could create a really fantastic online TiVo type solution. Rather than having to wait for your TV to broadcast a show, broadcasters could put the shows online, via BitTorrent, and you could subscribe with RSS, getting every TV show you wanted. Of course, since that time, online hosted video has become more popular, with the likes of YouTube getting much of the attention. However, it looks like the idea of using BitTorrent to distribute TV programs in an authorized manner hasn’t disappeared. Joe writes in to alert us that CBC Television up in Canada is planning to distribute copies of their program Canada?s Next Great Prime Minister via BitTorrent right after it airs. And, yes, they’ll be doing it DRM-free. As the folks behind the show have said: “The show will [be] completely free (and legal) for you to download, share & burn to your heart’s desire.” Nice to see some are starting to get it. Rather than locking stuff down, you want to share it as widely as possible.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: cbc

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “CBC Plans To BitTorrent Its Own TV Program”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
9 Comments
Mikester says:

Nice but...

While I am excited to see a network paradigm shifting, you need to realize that the CBC is Canada’s public broadcaster. That is, their shows, including this one, are paid for by Canadian tax payers. So really, they are probably in the best position to experiment with this concept with less to lose than a private broadcaster.

What is especially interesting however, is how / if this will start having any affect on Rogers or other Canadian ISPs that throttle or interfere in some way with bittorrent transfers. I doubt it will any time soon, but hopefully as the CBC releases more content to bittorrent, the less argument the ISPs have for interfering due to piracy concerns. Less face it, if Canadians can’t get access to the content their tax dollars are paying for, the CRTC (Canadian FCC) should be stepping in and forcing Rogers et al to stop what they are doing to torrent transfers.

dwandy says:

RFC for torrent protocol ?

TV shows are paid for via advertisement $$$. Local affiliate stations sell local ad content.
(1) Torrent is the same file everywhere, which would exclude local ad content, meaning that only the Biggies (Coke et.al) would be able to support the content.
(2) There exists already geo/IP databases. While they may not be perfect, they’re pretty close.
The idea would be to generate a torrent that had n% common data, and 100-n% data by geolocation. The original seed would have all the data, and downstream you would have the option of downloading based on your geolocation, or also all the data so you could help to seed.(The complete file would always be based on your location, so you could play the file, the other segments would be stored as distinct files)
The torrent client could also be instructed to generate a file for a different region.

While this could be used as described above, geo-location doesn’t have to be the only delimiter: I Am Legend has been released with two endings: All but the last 3-6minutes are identical. Why download two complete copies for 3-6minutes of different video? The initial seed (from the studio!!) would include an “alternate ending” delimiter. Once downloaded, the user would have the option of watching the original, or the torrent client could generate a file with the alternate ending.
What this really is, is the idea that there may be a reason for some (substantial) part of a file to be identical for everyone, but that some (or all) clients would get different or additional data at random points. Ideally, the inserted parts would not even need to be the same length as the original.

mozetti says:

Re: Re:

Simple answer: BT is a protocol, emule is a client. With BT you can use any client that uses the BT protocol, of which there are many. And the edonkey protocol, which emule uses, isn’t maintained and is fairly out of date.

BT is a mature protocol that is well-developed and mature. It requires no central server so there is little, if any additional cost involved in distributing files via BT.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...