Catching On To The Combination Of RSS And BitTorrent

from the seeing-the-power dept

Well, that didn't take long. Wired News is already reporting about Andrew Grumet quick and dirty demo of a combination of RSS and BitTorrent - something we were just discussing last week. It will be interesting to see how the major media players respond (if at all). What this does, is offer them an easy way to offer up online content to users (whether you're a big, small or almost non-existent media player). It has two major benefits: (1) it follows much more of a "push" model of content delivery, where a user receives any new content when it's released and (2) whoever publishes the content does not get hit with insane bandwidth use. Of course, if history is any indication, the major media companies will completely ignore the benefits, and jump to the conclusion that this is just another "tool for piracy" - which would be an unfortunate view of the technology (which actually isn't all that useful for illegally sharing files). Of course, the other interesting thing to watch is how many other companies start to copy this idea with BitTorrent-like distribution systems. There's no reason this specifically needs to be done with BitTorrent - and having some other options (perhaps ones that are easier to set up and understand) could help drive adoption even more.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Doug from the Hood, 15 Mar 2004 @ 11:12am

    No Subject Given

    Why wouldn't this help illegal file sharing??? I am confused. Please visit www.suprnova.org. It seems to me that Torrent is HELPINg illegal file sharing.

    Or maybe I am not getting enough sleep :)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 15 Mar 2004 @ 11:34am

      Re: No Subject Given

      The problem with using bittorrent for illegal sharing is that it's painfully easy to locate who's responsible...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Brian Clark, 15 Mar 2004 @ 12:30pm

        Swarming a little different

        I think Mike hit it on the head there: the difference between swarming and other P2P methods is in how the download gets originated. From a media producer's standpoint, I'm still the source of the torrent file (and publishing a torrent file is a way to help speed up the download and not bear as much of the cost.) If I take down the torrent file, then it's essentially out of BT (unless someone else publishes the torrent file, in which case they are easy to track down.)

        That swarming aspect is part of what makes the RSS feed addition possible where in other P2P it would be far more frustrating -- since the torrent file is always up (supposedly) you can point to it with a feed as an authority, rather than just having to point to one of the peers that may or may not be up, or point to some "central index" of where to get that peer.

        Keep at it, Mike: clearly more education still needs to be done about why BT is a wee bit different than other kinds of P2P.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    TAD, 15 Mar 2004 @ 12:02pm

    No Subject Given

    But, with BitTorrents, you're only sharing a PART of a file with others, and usually not with hundreds or thousands of others, just the 5 or 6 people who are connected to you.

    I can't possibly see the difference in doing this and in sharing my VHS copy of the Sopranos with a buddy or two - and that's legal, isn't it? It'll be difficult for the empty suits to point at one person and say - this PIRATE is sharing 500000 files online! They can say, hey, Joe Blow shared a part of the Sopranos episode with 7 people.

    Isn't that a little different?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 15 Mar 2004 @ 12:42pm

    No Subject Given

    What if we used the combined power of RSS, BitTorrent, PHP, CGI, and XML! Just Imagine!

    I'll go patent that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.