Harvard Faculty Agrees To Free Up Its Research

from the about-time dept

While MIT has received plenty of attention over the years for its effort to free up all course materials a potentially equally as interesting move happened at Harvard yesterday, where Arts & Sciences faculty agreed to free up their research. For many years, there’s been a push by some to change the process for publishing research. Typically, academic research would appear in journals that were incredibly expensive, potentially limiting the access to that research, even if the research was publicly funded. However, what this group of Harvard faculty have now done is agree that any research they publish will also be available for free online. As mentioned recently, in an age where everyone is so focused on intellectual property, it suddenly makes things like teaching and learning appear to be mighty similar to what others call theft or infringement. It’s nice to see some universities starting to push back on that.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: harvard

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Harvard Faculty Agrees To Free Up Its Research”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
10 Comments
dorpus says:

Increases spam

Will professors not get bombarded with email from amateur second-guessers taking cheapshots at their research? As it is, physics professors are bombarded with spam from crackpots claiming to have discovered the “theory of anti-gravity” or whatever. If medical research or social science research is opened to the masses, we can expect the same phenomena to follow suit.

Josh says:

Re: Increases spam

I don’t think that this would happen. Besides, professors probably already get emails, phone calls, etc. from crackpots and their research. One of my professors had to stop going to a local cafe because of some guy there trying to talk about his “theories”. I don’t think making any professor research more readily available will change that any.

One the whole, I think this is great. Getting a hold of quality research or course material (for whatever purposes) can be expensive, and needlessly difficult sometimes. Opening things up (like ocw.mit.edu has begun to do) should help people get information they’re looking for. After all, most academic research won’t really help or hurt the “average” person any (it’s usually pretty specific, narrow and technical, which makes it hard sometimes to get any practical usage out of it), so making it available for those who really do have an interest in the topics would be highly beneficial, speaking as a current grad student.

dorpus says:

Re: Re: Increases spam

If the papers become more available, then propaganda groups will quote the papers out of context to “prove” their agenda. The media will jump all over the “findings”, bringing unwanted attention and false accusations against the professors. And as often happens, even if the professors explain themselves clearly, the media will splice up the footage to put words in the professor’s mouth.

Sven says:

Re: Re: Re: Increases spam

Look anyone who publishes research could potentially spliced by the media, who do you makes the anouncements that the research has been completed. Almost all of the research is available for free to ANYBODY from a City/University/College library, as long as they have a subscription to the Pulishing journal. HMMMM….how much does it cost to join a library, oh yeah ITS FREE. Its been free for years…even DUMB people with crackpot claims have figured this out. How do you think they have been accessing that information. What this recent activity does is make one step easier to access that research.

Iron Chef says:

Good Start for the non e-Enabled...

I think this is a step in the right direction, because this will accelerate information dissemenation and the peer review process.

However, it’s not where the real cost savings are. I think that would be in the textbook arena- where once a book is published, and proceeds through the required approvals at the educational facility, the content and research within the textbook could be up to 5 years old.

However, this accelerated enhancement of productivity helps the school and professors to adapt and understand the power of mass collaboration and hopefully, as a customer, pursuade the textbook publishers to consider this new model

Jesse says:

I find it interesting that if someone does research they can’t sell it to more than one journal. This is accepted in the scientific community, but why is this right? Some people argue that you shouldn’t get credit for your research more than once, but isn’t that what the journals do when they sell copies to more than one individual? Do lots of work to make one journal, copy it and sell it…interesting how it’s business in one context and plagiarism in the other.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...