Another Day, Another Smackdown By A Judge Against The RIAA

from the yet-again... dept

In the early days of the RIAA lawsuits, it seemed like judges just took the RIAA’s word on things, but that’s long since changed as lawyers defending those accused have become more sophisticated — often realizing that the RIAA research tactics were questionable, the evidence they had was quite flimsy and the system was guaranteed to accuse all sorts of innocent people without much support. As this has happened, judges have become increasingly skeptical of these RIAA lawsuits and those who haven’t done anything wrong actually (finally) have a decent chance of pointing out that the RIAA’s evidence is wrong. And, in fact, judges are increasingly pushing the RIAA to pay the legal fees of the people they falsely accuse. In the latest such decision, a judge has smacked down the RIAA and ordered them to pay the legal fees in the case of Tanya Andersen. You may recall that the RIAA had accused Andersen of copyright infringement a few years ago — and then continued to pressure and intimidate her long after it became quite obvious that Andersen clearly was not guilty of what the RIAA was accusing her of doing. The RIAA eventually dropped the case, but Andersen wanted her legal fees paid (separately, she’s also suing the RIAA, claiming their investigation techniques are illegal).

The ruling from the judge on paying the legal fees is well worth reading, as it suggests yet another judge is sick and tired of the RIAA assuming that it can just throw up some flimsy evidence and then bully people into paying:

Copyright holders generally, and these plaintiffs specifically, should be deterred from prosecuting infringement claims as plaintiffs did in this case. Plaintiffs exerted a significant amount of control over the course of discovery, repeatedly and successfully seeking the court’s assistance through an unusually extended and contentious period of discovery disputes. Nonetheless, after ample opportunity to develop their claims, they dismissed them at the point they were required to produce evidence for the court’s consideration of the merits….. this case provides too little assurance that a prosecuting party won’t deem an infringement claim unsupportable until after the prevailing defendant has been forced to mount a considerable defense, and undergo all that entails, including the incurring of substantial attorney fees.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: riaa

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Another Day, Another Smackdown By A Judge Against The RIAA”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
24 Comments
Mike C. says:

Not the final decision

Unfortunately, this is only the first step. While it may appear a formality, there are still the opportunity for both sides to raise objections and it must be signed by the District judge.

That being said, this will carry a lot of weight in not only this case, but her class action suit and any other suit of this type where the defendant is clearly innocent.

Old Guy says:

Pay up

I’m no lawyer, so I don’t know if this would be legit but…

Could a court slap a lien on RIAA assets rendering them unable to use those assets to sue other innocent people until such time as they pay up those who they already owe? (sweet catch-22 there)
Are entities such as the RIAA subject anything similar to wage garnishment as are individuals?

Any atty’s out there that can answer?

Anonymous Coward says:

I’ve always thought judges in general were smarter than your average person. This viewpoint has been losing some ground as of late with the way patent claims and the RIAA suits have been going.

But it seems to me, the judges were merely cautious on subjects they are only loosely knowledgeable in (some tech patent claims take a bit of understanding, and the RIAA’s arguments were, weither you like it or not, sufficent enough to require some thought about). Hopefully this is a start to a new trend, and more of these stupid lawsuits get slapped down with harsher penalties to those bringing them to court.

Reed says:

Re: Re: R E S P E C T, what companies need to do

“Maybe then we could get some who understood how not to interfere with honest companies just trying to make an honest dollar.”

Suuure, I know literally tons of completely honest companies that just need to be left alone so they can make a profit. Unfortunately the RIAA and the MPAA aren’t one of these companies nor are most major US corporations.

If we seriously consider just “leaving” companies alone then companies are seriously going to have to start following some kind of real ethical guidelines. The chances of a major corporation being ethical over making a profit is not very realistic.

Until then we will have to keep harassing these companies until they respect our citizenship rights just as we respect their right to exist.

Today's Optimist says:

Hooray~

I’ll take what good we can get. The law moves slowly, folks. Really, really slowly. And it doesn’t help when you’ve got some of the largest, most powerful companies in the country lobbying to keep antiquated, biased laws or have the laws interpreted in their favor. The courts won’t vote on the side of the people (and against the powerful evil folk) until they think enough people are pissed off enough about the issue to take a certain stance.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...