New Top NBC Exec Didn't Get The Memo On YouTube's Usefulness

from the how-quickly-things-change dept

What a difference one executive makes. Over the last year or so, we’ve noted that Disney has become much more reasonable when it comes to new business models and embracing the internet under Robert Iger (though, he pissed off most of the rest of Hollywood in doing so). Unfortunately, it looks like NBC might be moving in the opposite direction. While the company had just been discussing how useful online videos were and appeared to be embracing the promotional benefits of YouTube, the new top executive at NBC Universal, Jeff Zucker, apparently didn’t get the memo, and attacked YouTube in the press his very first day on the job. Of course, Zucker isn’t really “new,” having been at NBC in leading executive roles for many, many years — it’s just that he’s moved up a notch. So, it’s a bit strange that the rest of the company he runs seems to have been pulling in the opposite direction…

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “New Top NBC Exec Didn't Get The Memo On YouTube's Usefulness”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Nobody Special says:

not surprised

I suspect he did get the memo. And perhaps he disagrees with it. It is not unusual for someone in the top levels to disagree with the direction a company heads.

It could also be some sort of two pronged approach. The head talks about the evils, while the tail benefits from those evils. In the meantime nothing is done and they head can claim to be friends with those who believe the evils should be stopped. Why do you think that large corporations give to both sides of a political race? Either way the race goes, they win.

sysadmn (profile) says:

No wonder

Um, read the article. The first part says he claims YouTube should do a better job of blocking copyrighted material, and the second says YouTube is believed to be in talks to pay for copyrighted material. Connect the dots. He’s not necessarily saying giving content away is bad, but it sure looks like he wants better control over it, or is posturing for a better monetary deal. He can’t extract more money from YouTube for content if YouTube drags their heels in preventing fans from uploading it for free.

Anonymous Coward says:

Jiminy freakin’ cricket man…

Business Opportunity: People want to watch your shows online…not REEE!!! REEE!!! REEE!!! SECURITY BREACH @ YOUTUBE.COM!!!

isn’t it obvious what the solution is???

YouTube: Give the networks there own page on the site and link all their protected material through there. The Networks can get advertising kickbacks for hits on there page. Hell, they don’t even need to put ads in the video if they can have six different ads running next to it simultaneously. Let the networks sell episodes directly from the site, or from their own external site. Either way, you guys can work out the details.

Networks: Just like any other business, loses happen. Every retail store deals with shoplifting everyday. You are no exception, piracy is going to happen no matter what you do. It is very easy to find almost any recent episode of almost any show on the internet. Give the people what they want, and make some money on the side.
Remember, you’re in the entertainment industry. Learn a lesson from the mistakes of the **AAs. Entertainment needs to be fun, it shouldn’t feel like you’re doing your taxes when you’re just trying to take your mind off the hustle and bustle of everyday life.

So, just my $0.02, I know it’s simplistic, but sometimes that’s the best solution…

SailorAlphaCentauri says:

Re: Re:

YouTube is already doing this, of sorts. I was on it last week and there are a number of CBS clips on the site (with a CBS banner on the page it appeared on and everything), so YouTube isn’t the party unwilling to bend in this case. Jeff Zucker apparently wants people to not care about NBC’s programs because he’d rather put down YouTube than make use of it to showcase his network’s shows.

I remember when the Lazy Sunday sketch (or whatever the hell it was called) got popular. I went to look for it on YouTube but NBC had had it taken down. I went to NBC’s site (where they proudly crowed that you could see their clips legitimately instead of illegally) and spent far more time digging through their pages to find the clip than it took to watch it. And by the time I found it, I couldn’t give a damn how funny it was supposed to be because I spent too much time looking for it. If Zucker and NBC want to be obstinate, let them. They can lose potential viewers to their tired old shows and be the has-been network.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...